The Top 25 Index
Updated Oct 14, 6:55 AM · 2026 season, week 7 next · how this is calculated
| Rk | Move | Team | Index | Playoff | Résumé | Chem | Sure? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | — | Notre Dame 6-0 · Independent | 96 | 98%proj. #1 seed | #6vs #29 schedule | 80 | |
| 2 | ▲1 | Georgia 6-0 · SEC | 94 | 90%proj. #2 seed | #1vs #31 schedule | 79 | |
| 3 | ▼1 | Alabama 5-1 · SEC | 93 | 75%proj. #4 seed | #5vs #2 schedule | 74 | |
| 4 | ▲1 | Miami 5-0 · ACC | 93 | 93%proj. #3 seed | #11vs #100 schedule | 71 | |
| 5 | ▼1 | Ohio State 5-1 · Big Ten | 92 | 68%proj. #6 seed | #17vs #34 schedule ▲ better than record | 65 | |
| 6 | — | Texas 4-1 · SEC | 87 | 61%proj. #9 seed | #7vs #1 schedule | 67 | |
| 7 | — | LSU 4-2 · SEC | 87 | 21%first four out | #31vs #25 schedule ▲ better than record | 60 | |
| 8 | — | Indiana 6-0 · Big Ten | 87 | 76%proj. #5 seed | #4vs #62 schedule | 72 | |
| 9 | — | Utah 5-0 · Big 12 | 85 | 58%proj. #10 seed | #14vs #73 schedule | 66 | |
| 10 | — | Oregon 3-2 · Big Ten | 82 | 20%long shot | #34vs #17 schedule ▲ better than record | 61 | |
| 11 | ▲1 | Texas Tech 5-0 · Big 12 | 80 | 62%proj. #8 seed | #8vs #69 schedule | 68 | |
| 12 | ▲4 | BYU 5-0 · Big 12 | 80 | 44%first four out | #10vs #71 schedule | 71 | |
| 13 | — | Nebraska 5-1 · Big Ten | 80 | 21%first four out | #27vs #78 schedule ▲ better than record | 72 | |
| 14 | ▲8 | Ole Miss 4-1 · SEC | 80 | 19%long shot | #11vs #13 schedule | 66 | |
| 15 | ▲3 | Missouri 5-1 · SEC | 79 | 17%long shot | #13vs #24 schedule | 66 | |
| 16 | ▲1 | UCLA 5-0 · Big Ten | 79 | 66%proj. #7 seed | #3vs #19 schedule ▼ record ahead of play | 63 | |
| 17 | ▼2 | Oklahoma 3-2 · SEC | 79 | 9%long shot | #20vs #5 schedule | 62 | |
| 18 | ▲3 | Houston 5-1 · Big 12 | 79 | 45%proj. #11 seed | #17vs #37 schedule | 74 | |
| 19 | ▼5 | Tennessee 5-1 · SEC | 78 | 16%long shot | #20vs #44 schedule | 67 | |
| 20 | ▼9 | Texas A&M 3-3 · SEC | 78 | <2% out of the hunt | #45vs #9 schedule ▲ better than record | 36 | |
| 21 | ▲5 | Iowa 5-1 · Big Ten | 78 | 20%long shot | #15vs #39 schedule | 62 | |
| 22 | ▲2 | USC 6-1 · Big Ten | 77 | 19%long shot | #17vs #22 schedule | 65 | |
| 23 | ▼4 | Florida 4-2 · SEC | 77 | 4%long shot | #24vs #16 schedule | 63 | |
| 24 | ▲9 | South Carolina 3-3 · SEC | 76 | <2% out of the hunt | #49vs #26 schedule ▲ better than record | 61 | |
| 25 | ▲5 | Wisconsin 4-1 · Big Ten | 76 | 11%long shot | #20vs #30 schedule | 61 |
How to read the Index · 10 secondshide guide
94
Index. The dot is how good the team is, 0–99. The gold bar is the margin of error. Wider means less certain.#3
Résumé. How impressive the win-loss record is for the schedule played, ranked among all FBS teams. Beating nobody doesn't rank high. Schedule ranks opponents faced so far (#1 = toughest, red = soft).▲ better than record▼ record ahead of play
Better than its record / record ahead of its play. Shown beside the Résumé only when it and the Index disagree. Hover the tab beside the rank for the one-line reason (e.g. close wins, losses only to top teams).Sure? How confident the model is in this rank. Three dots means very.
Index = the model's predicted margin vs. an average FBS team on a neutral field, on the 0–99 scale.All 138 teams →
Around the sport
Biggest movers · since last update
Conference strength · average Index margin
SEC+17.8
FBS Independents+15.3
Big Ten+12.7
Big 12+10.7
ACC+7.4
Pac-12-0.1
American Athletic-4.0
Mountain West-7.1
Sun Belt-7.3
Conference USA-10.0
Mid-American-11.9
Top head coaches · formall coaches →
Top players · 2026all players →