Scorebook
Join
Teams / Big 12 / Arizona State
Index · this season
67
at its 5-year level▼ Down 5 this season
Career67since 1936
Peak901996
Last 569seasons
#61 nationally · 3-2 (1-1 conf)
Résumé #45 · record ahead of its play
Schedule so far #52
Margin ±5 pts (tightens with games)
Why 67? →

Arizona State Sun Devils

Big 12 · Tempe, AZ · Mountain America Stadium · Head coach Kenny Dillingham
Rival
Arizona · also UCLA
Heated rivalry
45-43-1 all time (89 meetings since 1931)
Arizona State leads
Last: lost 23-7 (2025)
Wants it back
program traits are earned from history
No recognized national titles since 1936. Counted: AP poll champion, a coaches-poll champion, or the BCS / playoff title-game winner; a split year counts for both.0national titles
Heisman Trophy winners0Heisman
Seasons finishing in the AP top 10 since 19368AP top-10
Consensus All-Americans since 193611All-Americans
NFL draft picks since 1967157NFL picks
Winning percentage since 193661.0%win pct
History since 1936 · football since 1931. Every season →
Chemistry
Chem 51: typical51
Chem 51: typical
51Foundation
Chem 51: typical
51Gel
gel counts 40% so far
at its usual levelTrending down
early · #103 of 138
HC year4
Ret. starters14%
QB yrs w/ OC1
View chemistry →
Team chemistryearly · #103 of 138 FBS teams
Chem 51: typicalFoundation51+Chem 51: typicalGel51=Chem 51: typicalChem51Gel counts 40% so far (it grows as games are played, up to half)
Foundationwhat the program has built · moves over seasons
Foundation51Staff stability — Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnoverStaff stability62Roster continuity — Returning starters and the lineup's experienceRoster continuity45Unit cohesion — QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played togetherUnit cohesion42Administration — Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignmentAdministration56Investment — Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruitingInvestment74Fan base — How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matterFan base32
ContinuityClimate
Continuity · who has played and coached togetherlive

Who has played and coached together, and for how long, ranked against every FBS team at the same point of the season.

▸Staff stability
Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnover
62
Staff cohesion69
HC year 4 · OC year 3 · DC year 4
Assistant turnover54
50% of on-field staff new this season (FBS average about 45%)
▸Roster continuity
Returning starters and the lineup's experience
45
Returning core26
14% of last season's starters · FBS median 32%
Experience64
12 career starts per starter · FBS median 12
▸Unit cohesion
QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played together
42
QB & coordinator55
1st season together · same as 76% of FBS teams
QB & receivers47
2.8 games started together on average · FBS median 3.9
Line cohesion6
2.2 games per linemen pair · FBS median 5.2
Defensive cohesion49
3.8 games per defensive pair · FBS median 4.5
Climate · around the programlive

The administration, money and fans around the team: athletic director continuity, willingness to invest, and crowds.

▸Administration
Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignment
56
AD continuity56
Graham Rossini · year 3 (Wikipedia, CC BY-SA)
▸Investment
Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruiting
74
Football's share72
34% of department spending goes to football
Investment trend78
+59% over three years
Football investment75
$50.4M on football (2024-25 federal report)
Recruiting spend66
$1.77M men's recruiting
Department resources68
$149M athletic department revenue
▸Fan base
How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matter
32
Sellouts30
sellout crowds (95%+ of capacity) at 0 of 49 home games (last 8 seasons)
Sells out anyway34
sellout crowds at 0 of 31 games that didn't matter: cupcakes, or a team expected to lose or having a losing season

Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures, as reported by each school. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA). Attendance: reported crowds vs stadium capacity.

Gelhow it is working right now · moves week to week
Gel51Playing above its parts — Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by gamePlaying above its parts35Settled & sharp — A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normalSettled & sharp65Alignment — Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one pageAlignmentsoonResilience — Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversityResiliencesoonFan & media mood — Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins laterFan & media mood40Coach security — The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new ADCoach security49
InternalOn-field fitExternal
Internal · how the program talkscoming

How the team talks in press conferences and interviews, each program against its own normal, so a naturally terse coach isn't read as upset. Being built program by program, Big Ten first.

▸Alignment
Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one page
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.
▸Resilience
Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversity
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.

Readings are team-level; we don't publish psychological readings of individual players.

On-field fit · how it is playing togetherlive

How the team is playing together this season: beating or missing its preseason expectation, a settled lineup, clean execution.

▸Playing above its parts
Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by game
35
This season35
-6.5 points a game vs its preseason projection (4 games)
▸Settled & sharp
A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normal
65
This season65
83% of starters kept game to game
External · pressure from outsidelive

Pressure from outside the building: the hard-facts hot seat now; this season's fan and media mood as it is measured.

▸Fan & media mood
Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins later
40
This season40
outside the AP poll: projected #38 preseason -> #61 in our Index now · results 3-2 (+4, recent games count more)
▸Coach security
The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new AD
49
This season49
Kenny Dillingham, year 4 · 60% wins so far · -6.5 pts a game vs preseason expectation · last two seasons +20% vs the program's norm

Dashed gold ring = typical (62). 20-50 is the warning zone; under 10 is a collapse. Spokes with no data yet are dashed and left out until they fill in. Chem blends the two halves, then places the blend among this season's teams.

Trend · Foundationeach program year runs Feb 1 to the title game
'1670'1764'1834'1965'2056'2163'2251'2316'2452'2567'262016 wk 1 vs Northern Arizona: 70 · W2016 wk 2 vs Texas Tech: 80 · W2016 wk 3 vs UTSA: 68 · W2016 wk 4 vs California: 72 · W2016 wk 5 vs USC: 73 · L2016 wk 6 vs UCLA: 75 · W2016 wk 7 vs Colorado: 66 · L2016 wk 8 vs Washington State: 75 · L2016 wk 9 vs Oregon: 69 · L2016 wk 11 vs Utah: 62 · L2016 wk 12 vs Washington: 69 · L2016 wk 13 vs Arizona: 70 · L2017 wk 2 vs San Diego State: 66 · L2017 wk 3 vs Texas Tech: 65 · L2017 wk 4 vs Oregon: 65 · W2017 wk 5 vs Stanford: 65 · L2017 wk 7 vs Washington: 65 · W2017 wk 8 vs Utah: 65 · W2017 wk 9 vs USC: 65 · L2017 wk 10 vs Colorado: 67 · W2017 wk 11 vs UCLA: 66 · L2017 wk 12 vs Oregon State: 66 · W2017 wk 13 vs Arizona: 65 · W2017 wk 1 vs NC State: 64 · L2018 wk 2 vs Michigan State: 35 · W2018 wk 3 vs San Diego State: 33 · L2018 wk 4 vs Washington: 36 · L2018 wk 5 vs Oregon State: 36 · W2018 wk 6 vs Colorado: 37 · L2018 wk 8 vs Stanford: 36 · L2018 wk 9 vs USC: 37 · W2018 wk 10 vs Utah: 37 · W2018 wk 11 vs UCLA: 37 · W2018 wk 12 vs Oregon: 38 · L2018 wk 13 vs Arizona: 34 · W2018 wk 1 vs Fresno State: 34 · L2019 wk 2 vs Sacramento State: 65 · W2019 wk 3 vs Michigan State: 67 · W2019 wk 4 vs Colorado: 65 · L2019 wk 5 vs California: 67 · W2019 wk 7 vs Washington State: 65 · W2019 wk 8 vs Utah: 68 · L2019 wk 9 vs UCLA: 68 · L2019 wk 11 vs USC: 67 · L2019 wk 12 vs Oregon State: 64 · L2019 wk 13 vs Oregon: 65 · W2019 wk 14 vs Arizona: 66 · W2019 wk 1 vs Florida State: 65 · W2020 wk 14 vs UCLA: 55 · L2020 wk 15 vs Arizona: 56 · W2020 wk 16 vs Oregon State: 56 · W2021 wk 2 vs UNLV: 67 · W2021 wk 3 vs BYU: 73 · L2021 wk 4 vs Colorado: 69 · W2021 wk 5 vs UCLA: 66 · W2021 wk 6 vs Stanford: 66 · W2021 wk 7 vs Utah: 68 · L2021 wk 9 vs Washington State: 66 · L2021 wk 10 vs USC: 67 · W2021 wk 11 vs Washington: 68 · W2021 wk 12 vs Oregon State: 66 · L2021 wk 13 vs Arizona: 65 · W2021 wk 1 vs Wisconsin: 63 · L2022 wk 2 vs Oklahoma State: 40 · L2022 wk 3 vs Eastern Michigan: 52 · L2022 wk 4 vs Utah: 41 · L2022 wk 5 vs USC: 52 · L2022 wk 6 vs Washington: 51 · W2022 wk 8 vs Stanford: 53 · L2022 wk 9 vs Colorado: 42 · W2022 wk 10 vs UCLA: 43 · L2022 wk 11 vs Washington State: 45 · L2022 wk 12 vs Oregon State: 42 · L2022 wk 13 vs Arizona: 51 · L2023 wk 2 vs Oklahoma State: 13 · L2023 wk 3 vs Fresno State: 17 · L2023 wk 4 vs USC: 28 · L2023 wk 5 vs California: 27 · L2023 wk 6 vs Colorado: 29 · L2023 wk 8 vs Washington: 28 · L2023 wk 9 vs Washington State: 28 · W2023 wk 10 vs Utah: 16 · L2023 wk 11 vs UCLA: 30 · W2023 wk 12 vs Oregon: 15 · L2023 wk 13 vs Arizona: 16 · L2024 wk 2 vs Mississippi State: 50 · W2024 wk 3 vs Texas State: 50 · W2024 wk 4 vs Texas Tech: 56 · L2024 wk 6 vs Kansas: 56 · W2024 wk 7 vs Utah: 56 · W2024 wk 8 vs Cincinnati: 55 · L2024 wk 10 vs Oklahoma State: 53 · W2024 wk 11 vs UCF: 56 · W2024 wk 12 vs Kansas State: 57 · W2024 wk 13 vs BYU: 56 · W2024 wk 14 vs Arizona: 58 · W2024 wk 15 vs Iowa State: 55 · W2024 wk 1 vs Texas: 52 · L2025 wk 2 vs Mississippi State: 73 · L2025 wk 3 vs Texas State: 73 · W2025 wk 4 vs Baylor: 73 · W2025 wk 5 vs TCU: 73 · W2025 wk 7 vs Utah: 73 · L2025 wk 8 vs Texas Tech: 68 · W2025 wk 9 vs Houston: 72 · L2025 wk 10 vs Iowa State: 71 · W2025 wk 12 vs West Virginia: 66 · W2025 wk 13 vs Colorado: 69 · W2025 wk 14 vs Arizona: 69 · L2025 wk 1 vs Duke: 67 · L2026 wk 2 vs Texas A&M: 55 · L2026 wk 3 vs Kansas: 54 · W2026 wk 5 vs Baylor: 55 · L2026 wk 6 vs Hawai'i: 53 · W2026 wk 7 vs Texas Tech: 52 · next gametypical 62

Every game since 2016, one continuous line; thin rules separate seasons and the chip is where each season finished. Navy dot = win, red = loss. Big drops usually mean a new staff, a new quarterback or a rebuilt line.

Trend · Gelthis season, after each game
typical 62wk 2 vs Texas A&M · L · on-field 52 · fan mood 49512wk 3 vs Kansas · W · on-field 58 · fan mood 54573wk 5 vs Baylor · L · on-field 55 · fan mood 30465wk 6 vs Hawai'i · W · on-field 59 · fan mood 34506

How the team is working right now, rebuilt after each game from only the games so far: on-field fit (results vs preseason expectation, lineup settling, execution) and that week's fan & media mood. Coach security is part of today's Gel number but isn't rebuilt week by week yet. Navy frame = win, red = loss.

Continuity facts
Head coach
Year 4
at this school
Offensive coordinator
Year 3
at this school
Defensive coordinator
Year 4
at this school
HC & OC together
3 seasons
working together
QB with his OC
1 seasons
same play-caller
QB & receivers
2.8 games
started together, average
Offensive line pairs
2.2 games
started together, average
Returning starters
14%
from last season
Starter experience
12 starts
career average
Internal facts
Pressers read
soon
this season, coaches and players
Coach tone
soon
vs his own normal
"We" vs "I"
soon
share of team language
Owning mistakes
soon
vs pointing outward
Same story
soon
coaches and players agree
After losses
soon
how fast tone recovers
Leaders named
soon
players teammates point to
Newcomers
soon
transfers talked about as part of it
Openness
soon
forthcoming vs guarded
Measured from press conferences and interviews, program by program.
Climate facts
Athletic director
Graham Rossini
year 3
Football spending
$50.4M
2024-25 federal report
Spending trend
+59%
over three years
Department revenue
$149M
all sports
Recruiting spend
$1.77M
men's teams
Home crowds
—
of capacity
Staff turnover
50%
on-field staff new this season
Fan mood
soon
fans and local media
Coach & AD
soon
on the same page
Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Offense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Boley
Brown
Miller
Harris
Vines-Bright
Ia
Klemm
Stewart
Westbrooks
Alo-Tupuola
Lapuaho
QBCutter Boley44442144141
RBKyson Brown412442144141
WROmarion Miller44442144141
WRReed Harris44442144141
WRRaiden Vines-Bright22222122121
TEAJ Ia11111111111
OLJalen Klemm44442155241
OLMaki Stewart44442158241
OLChamp Westbrooks11111122211
OLTana Alo-Tupuola44442144141
OLSiosaia Lapuaho11111111111

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Defense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Pitre
Thompson
Lono-Wong
Fite
Hughes
Long
Rawls
Wilson
Warren
Stamps
Bimage
DLRoman Pitre32333332333
DLJalen Thompson23333333333
DLBlazen Lono-Wong33554443544
DLC.J. Fite3353654413745
LBMartell Hughes33455443444
LBOwen Long33444443444
DBLyrik Rawls33444443444
DBAdrian Wilson2331333313434
DBMontana Warren33574444744
DBAshton Stamps33444443444
DBRodney Bimage Jr.33454444445

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Chemistry is Scorebook's own rating of how well a program fits together, on the same all-time 0-99 scale as our other ratings (compared with every FBS team since 2016; 62 is typical, 20-50 signals something is wrong, and single digits are reserved for true collapses; each season is compared with its own era). This early version blends continuity (who has played and coached together, and for how long; it counts most) with the climate around the program; how the program talks joins as it is measured. Within continuity, quarterback-centered pairings count most because they held up when we tested them against results. How our ratings work →