Scorebook
Join
Teams / Big 12 / West Virginia
Index · this season
63
▼ Below its 5-year level -4▼ Down 6 this season
Career67since 1936
Peak932007
Last 567seasons
#75 nationally · 3-3 (0-3 conf)
Résumé #72
Schedule so far #53
Margin ±5 pts (tightens with games)
Why 63? →

West Virginia Mountaineers

Big 12 · Morgantown, WV · Milan Puskar Stadium · Head coach Rich Rodriguez
Rival
Building rivalry
37-61-3 all time (101 meetings since 1906)
Pittsburgh leads
Last: won 31-24 (2025)
Holds it
program traits are earned from history
No recognized national titles since 1936. Counted: AP poll champion, a coaches-poll champion, or the BCS / playoff title-game winner; a split year counts for both.0national titles
Heisman Trophy winners0Heisman
Seasons finishing in the AP top 10 since 19366AP top-10
Consensus All-Americans since 193611All-Americans
NFL draft picks since 196791NFL picks
Winning percentage since 193657.9%win pct
History since 1936 · football since 1896. Every season →
Chemistry
Chem 56: typical56
Chem 66: typical
66Foundation
Chem 43: warning zone
43Gel
gel counts 45% so far
at its usual levelTrending up
early · #77 of 138
HC year9
Ret. starters18%
QB yrs w/ OC—
View chemistry →
Team chemistryearly · #77 of 138 FBS teams
Chem 66: typicalFoundation66+Chem 43: warning zoneGel43=Chem 56: typicalChem56Gel counts 45% so far (it grows as games are played, up to half)
Foundationwhat the program has built · moves over seasons
Foundation66Staff stability — Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnoverStaff stability78Roster continuity — Returning starters and the lineup's experienceRoster continuity57Unit cohesion — QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played togetherUnit cohesion62Administration — Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignmentAdministration61Investment — Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruitingInvestment68Fan base — How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matterFan base68
ContinuityClimate
Continuity · who has played and coached togetherlive

Who has played and coached together, and for how long, ranked against every FBS team at the same point of the season.

▸Staff stability
Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnover
78
Staff cohesion—
Assistant turnover78
18% of on-field staff new this season (FBS average about 45%)
▸Roster continuity
Returning starters and the lineup's experience
57
Returning core37
18% of last season's starters · FBS median 32%
Experience77
15 career starts per starter · FBS median 12
▸Unit cohesion
QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played together
62
QB & coordinator—
QB & receivers68
4.3 games started together on average · FBS median 3.9
Line cohesion67
5.6 games per linemen pair · FBS median 5.2
Defensive cohesion48
3.7 games per defensive pair · FBS median 4.5
Climate · around the programlive

The administration, money and fans around the team: athletic director continuity, willingness to invest, and crowds.

▸Administration
Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignment
61
AD continuity61
Wren Baker · year 4 (Wikipedia, CC BY-SA)
▸Investment
Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruiting
68
Football's share62
30% of department spending goes to football
Investment trend77
+58% over three years
Football investment64
$35.3M on football (2024-25 federal report)
Recruiting spend67
$1.77M men's recruiting
Department resources63
$117M athletic department revenue
▸Fan base
How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matter
68
Sellouts68
sellout crowds (95%+ of capacity) at 13 of 42 home games (last 8 seasons)
Sells out anyway68
sellout crowds at 10 of 34 games that didn't matter: cupcakes, or a team expected to lose or having a losing season

Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures, as reported by each school. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA). Attendance: reported crowds vs stadium capacity.

Gelhow it is working right now · moves week to week
Gel43Playing above its parts — Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by gamePlaying above its parts37Settled & sharp — A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normalSettled & sharp64Alignment — Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one pageAlignmentsoonResilience — Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversityResiliencesoonFan & media mood — Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins laterFan & media mood25Coach security — The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new ADCoach security32
InternalOn-field fitExternal
Internal · how the program talkscoming

How the team talks in press conferences and interviews, each program against its own normal, so a naturally terse coach isn't read as upset. Being built program by program, Big Ten first.

▸Alignment
Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one page
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.
▸Resilience
Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversity
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.

Readings are team-level; we don't publish psychological readings of individual players.

On-field fit · how it is playing togetherlive

How the team is playing together this season: beating or missing its preseason expectation, a settled lineup, clean execution.

▸Playing above its parts
Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by game
37
This season37
-5.3 points a game vs its preseason projection (5 games)
▸Settled & sharp
A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normal
64
This season64
85% of starters kept game to game
External · pressure from outsidelive

Pressure from outside the building: the hard-facts hot seat now; this season's fan and media mood as it is measured.

▸Fan & media mood
Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins later
25
This season25
outside the AP poll: projected #50 preseason -> #75 in our Index now · lost to rival Oklahoma State 41-24 (-5) · results 3-3 (-2, recent games count more)
▸Coach security
The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new AD
32
This season32
Rich Rodriguez, year 9 · 50% wins so far · -5.3 pts a game vs preseason expectation · last two seasons -24% vs the program's norm

Dashed gold ring = typical (62). 20-50 is the warning zone; under 10 is a collapse. Spokes with no data yet are dashed and left out until they fill in. Chem blends the two halves, then places the blend among this season's teams.

Trend · Foundationeach program year runs Feb 1 to the title game
'1671'1742'1866'1953'2063'2160'2260'2356'2468'2554'262016 wk 1 vs Missouri: 63 · W2016 wk 2 vs Youngstown State: 76 · W2016 wk 4 vs BYU: 67 · W2016 wk 5 vs Kansas State: 75 · W2016 wk 7 vs Texas Tech: 72 · W2016 wk 8 vs TCU: 71 · W2016 wk 9 vs Oklahoma State: 73 · L2016 wk 10 vs Kansas: 75 · W2016 wk 11 vs Texas: 75 · W2016 wk 12 vs Oklahoma: 73 · L2016 wk 13 vs Iowa State: 75 · W2016 wk 14 vs Baylor: 76 · W2016 wk 1 vs Miami: 71 · L2017 wk 2 vs East Carolina: 41 · W2017 wk 3 vs Delaware State: 44 · W2017 wk 4 vs Kansas: 52 · W2017 wk 6 vs TCU: 54 · L2017 wk 7 vs Texas Tech: 55 · W2017 wk 8 vs Baylor: 56 · W2017 wk 9 vs Oklahoma State: 56 · L2017 wk 10 vs Iowa State: 56 · W2017 wk 11 vs Kansas State: 56 · W2017 wk 12 vs Texas: 56 · L2017 wk 13 vs Oklahoma: 57 · L2017 wk 1 vs Utah: 42 · L2018 wk 2 vs Youngstown State: 68 · W2018 wk 4 vs Kansas State: 66 · W2018 wk 5 vs Texas Tech: 67 · W2018 wk 6 vs Kansas: 71 · W2018 wk 7 vs Iowa State: 66 · L2018 wk 9 vs Baylor: 68 · W2018 wk 10 vs Texas: 67 · W2018 wk 11 vs TCU: 67 · W2018 wk 12 vs Oklahoma State: 69 · L2018 wk 13 vs Oklahoma: 70 · L2018 wk 1 vs Syracuse: 66 · L2019 wk 2 vs Missouri: 56 · L2019 wk 3 vs NC State: 56 · W2019 wk 4 vs Kansas: 48 · W2019 wk 6 vs Texas: 52 · L2019 wk 7 vs Iowa State: 52 · L2019 wk 8 vs Oklahoma: 55 · L2019 wk 10 vs Baylor: 52 · L2019 wk 11 vs Texas Tech: 53 · L2019 wk 12 vs Kansas State: 55 · W2019 wk 13 vs Oklahoma State: 54 · L2019 wk 14 vs TCU: 53 · W2020 wk 4 vs Oklahoma State: 59 · L2020 wk 5 vs Baylor: 60 · W2020 wk 7 vs Kansas: 62 · W2020 wk 8 vs Texas Tech: 62 · L2020 wk 9 vs Kansas State: 63 · W2020 wk 10 vs Texas: 65 · L2020 wk 11 vs TCU: 64 · W2020 wk 14 vs Iowa State: 64 · L2020 wk 1 vs Army: 63 · W2021 wk 2 vs Long Island University: 61 · W2021 wk 3 vs Virginia Tech: 62 · W2021 wk 4 vs Oklahoma: 63 · L2021 wk 5 vs Texas Tech: 64 · L2021 wk 6 vs Baylor: 63 · L2021 wk 8 vs TCU: 62 · W2021 wk 9 vs Iowa State: 62 · W2021 wk 10 vs Oklahoma State: 62 · L2021 wk 11 vs Kansas State: 59 · L2021 wk 12 vs Texas: 61 · W2021 wk 13 vs Kansas: 62 · W2021 wk 1 vs Minnesota: 60 · L2022 wk 2 vs Kansas: 65 · L2022 wk 3 vs Towson: 66 · W2022 wk 4 vs Virginia Tech: 65 · W2022 wk 5 vs Texas: 67 · L2022 wk 7 vs Baylor: 68 · W2022 wk 8 vs Texas Tech: 67 · L2022 wk 9 vs TCU: 67 · L2022 wk 10 vs Iowa State: 62 · L2022 wk 11 vs Oklahoma: 63 · W2022 wk 12 vs Kansas State: 66 · L2022 wk 13 vs Oklahoma State: 60 · W2023 wk 2 vs Duquesne: 59 · W2023 wk 3 vs Pittsburgh: 58 · W2023 wk 4 vs Texas Tech: 59 · W2023 wk 5 vs TCU: 56 · W2023 wk 7 vs Houston: 58 · L2023 wk 8 vs Oklahoma State: 58 · L2023 wk 9 vs UCF: 59 · W2023 wk 10 vs BYU: 59 · W2023 wk 11 vs Oklahoma: 58 · L2023 wk 12 vs Cincinnati: 60 · W2023 wk 13 vs Baylor: 57 · W2023 wk 1 vs North Carolina: 56 · W2024 wk 2 vs UAlbany: 68 · W2024 wk 3 vs Pittsburgh: 69 · L2024 wk 4 vs Kansas: 69 · W2024 wk 6 vs Oklahoma State: 68 · W2024 wk 7 vs Iowa State: 69 · L2024 wk 8 vs Kansas State: 70 · L2024 wk 9 vs Arizona: 67 · W2024 wk 11 vs Cincinnati: 63 · W2024 wk 12 vs Baylor: 65 · L2024 wk 13 vs UCF: 69 · W2024 wk 14 vs Texas Tech: 67 · L2024 wk 1 vs Memphis: 68 · L2025 wk 2 vs Ohio: 52 · L2025 wk 3 vs Pittsburgh: 55 · W2025 wk 4 vs Kansas: 54 · L2025 wk 5 vs Utah: 55 · L2025 wk 6 vs BYU: 49 · L2025 wk 8 vs UCF: 47 · L2025 wk 9 vs TCU: 45 · L2025 wk 10 vs Houston: 43 · W2025 wk 11 vs Colorado: 51 · W2025 wk 12 vs Arizona State: 52 · L2025 wk 14 vs Texas Tech: 54 · L2026 wk 2 vs UT Martin: 61 · W2026 wk 3 vs Virginia: 63 · W2026 wk 4 vs Oklahoma State: 65 · L2026 wk 5 vs Iowa State: 65 · L2026 wk 6 vs Arizona: 64 · L2026 wk 7 vs Cincinnati: 66 · next gametypical 62

Every game since 2016, one continuous line; thin rules separate seasons and the chip is where each season finished. Navy dot = win, red = loss. Big drops usually mean a new staff, a new quarterback or a rebuilt line.

Trend · Gelthis season, after each game
typical 62wk 1 · on-field 52 · fan mood 43491wk 2 vs UT Martin · W · on-field 67 · fan mood 58642wk 3 vs Virginia · W · on-field 76 · fan mood 72743wk 4 vs Oklahoma State · L · on-field 75 · fan mood 45644wk 5 vs Iowa State · L · on-field 66 · fan mood 42575wk 6 vs Arizona · L · on-field 59 · fan mood 40526

How the team is working right now, rebuilt after each game from only the games so far: on-field fit (results vs preseason expectation, lineup settling, execution) and that week's fan & media mood. Coach security is part of today's Gel number but isn't rebuilt week by week yet. Navy frame = win, red = loss.

Continuity facts
Head coach
Year 9
at this school
Offensive coordinator
Year —
at this school
Defensive coordinator
Year 2
at this school
HC & OC together
— seasons
working together
QB with his OC
— seasons
same play-caller
QB & receivers
4.3 games
started together, average
Offensive line pairs
5.6 games
started together, average
Returning starters
18%
from last season
Starter experience
15 starts
career average
Internal facts
Pressers read
soon
this season, coaches and players
Coach tone
soon
vs his own normal
"We" vs "I"
soon
share of team language
Owning mistakes
soon
vs pointing outward
Same story
soon
coaches and players agree
After losses
soon
how fast tone recovers
Leaders named
soon
players teammates point to
Newcomers
soon
transfers talked about as part of it
Openness
soon
forthcoming vs guarded
Measured from press conferences and interviews, program by program.
Climate facts
Athletic director
Wren Baker
year 4
Football spending
$35.3M
2024-25 federal report
Spending trend
+58%
over three years
Department revenue
$117M
all sports
Recruiting spend
$1.77M
men's teams
Home crowds
—
of capacity
Staff turnover
18%
on-field staff new this season
Fan mood
soon
fans and local media
Coach & AD
soon
on the same page
Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Offense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Hawkins
Cook
Latimer
Bray
Epps
Strachan
King
Casady
Krahe
Brown
Grayson
QBMichael Hawkins Jr.66166166566
RBCam Cook66166166566
RBAmari Latimer11111111111
WRJaden Bray66196166766
WRDJ Epps66166166566
WRPrince Strachan11111111111
OLWes King66166166566
OLCarsten Casady66166166566
OLNick Krahe551751551755
OLKevin Brown66166166566
OLAmare Grayson66166166566

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Defense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
McIntyre
Holloman
Gabriel
Durham-Campbell
Cutter
Woods
Wilson
Diagne
Robinson
Latimer
Sieg
DLCorey McIntyre Jr.55545355152
DLHarper Holloman56646466162
DLNate Gabriel56646466162
DLZeke Durham-Campbell44444244142
LBBen Cutter566416466162
LBAshton Woods34424444141
DBKamari Wilson56646466162
DBChams Diagne56646466162
DBKeyshawn Robinson11111111111
DBGeimere Latimer II56646466162
DBMatt Sieg22222122122

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Chemistry is Scorebook's own rating of how well a program fits together, on the same all-time 0-99 scale as our other ratings (compared with every FBS team since 2016; 62 is typical, 20-50 signals something is wrong, and single digits are reserved for true collapses; each season is compared with its own era). This early version blends continuity (who has played and coached together, and for how long; it counts most) with the climate around the program; how the program talks joins as it is measured. Within continuity, quarterback-centered pairings count most because they held up when we tested them against results. How our ratings work →