Scorebook
Join
Teams / ACC / Virginia Tech
Index · this season
72
▲ Above its 5-year level +7
Career66since 1936
Peak911999
Last 565seasons
#42 nationally · 4-2 (1-2 conf)
Résumé #53 · better than its record
Schedule so far #85
Margin ±5 pts (tightens with games)
Why 72? →

Virginia Tech Hokies

ACC · Blacksburg, VA · Lane Stadium · Head coach James Franklin
Rival
Virginia · also Miami
Heated rivalry
62-34-5 all time (101 meetings since 1902)
Virginia Tech leads
Last: lost 27-7 (2025)
Wants it back
program traits are earned from history
No recognized national titles since 1936. Counted: AP poll champion, a coaches-poll champion, or the BCS / playoff title-game winner; a split year counts for both.0national titles
Heisman Trophy winners0Heisman
Seasons finishing in the AP top 10 since 19367AP top-10
Consensus All-Americans since 19367All-Americans
NFL draft picks since 1967122NFL picks
Winning percentage since 193656.4%win pct
History since 1936 · football since 1902. Every season →
Chemistry
Chem 65: new staff, still building65
Chem 63: typical
63Foundation
Chem 68: typical
68Gel
gel counts 45% so far
at its usual level
early · #32 of 138
HC year1
Ret. starters64%
QB yrs w/ OC1
View chemistry →
Team chemistryearly · #32 of 138 FBS teams
Chem 63: typicalFoundation63+Chem 68: typicalGel68=Chem 65: typicalChem65Gel counts 45% so far (it grows as games are played, up to half)
Foundationwhat the program has built · moves over seasons
Foundation63Staff stability — Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnoverStaff stability54Roster continuity — Returning starters and the lineup's experienceRoster continuity86Unit cohesion — QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played togetherUnit cohesion71Administration — Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignmentAdministration30Investment — Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruitingInvestment43Fan base — How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matterFan base78
ContinuityClimate
Continuity · who has played and coached togetherlive

Who has played and coached together, and for how long, ranked against every FBS team at the same point of the season.

▸Staff stability
Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnover
54
Staff cohesion65
HC year 1 · OC year 1 · DC year 1
Assistant turnover43
77% of on-field staff new this season (FBS average about 45%)
▸Roster continuity
Returning starters and the lineup's experience
86
Returning core99
64% of last season's starters · FBS median 32%
Experience72
13 career starts per starter · FBS median 12
▸Unit cohesion
QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played together
71
QB & coordinator55
1st season together · same as 76% of FBS teams
QB & receivers74
5.2 games started together on average · FBS median 3.9
Line cohesion75
7.3 games per linemen pair · FBS median 5.2
Defensive cohesion85
7.0 games per defensive pair · FBS median 4.5
Climate · around the programlive

The administration, money and fans around the team: athletic director continuity, willingness to invest, and crowds.

▸Administration
Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignment
30
AD continuity30
Brian White · year 1 (Wikipedia, CC BY-SA)
▸Investment
Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruiting
43
Football's share40
25% of department spending goes to football
Investment trend21
-0% over three years
Football investment66
$37.8M on football (2024-25 federal report)
Recruiting spend77
$2.70M men's recruiting
Department resources69
$152M athletic department revenue
▸Fan base
How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matter
78
Sellouts77
sellout crowds (95%+ of capacity) at 29 of 44 home games (last 8 seasons)
Sells out anyway79
sellout crowds at 25 of 37 games that didn't matter: cupcakes, or a team expected to lose or having a losing season

Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures, as reported by each school. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA). Attendance: reported crowds vs stadium capacity.

Gelhow it is working right now · moves week to week
Gel68Playing above its parts — Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by gamePlaying above its parts67Settled & sharp — A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normalSettled & sharp60Alignment — Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one pageAlignmentsoonResilience — Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversityResiliencesoonFan & media mood — Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins laterFan & media mood70Coach security — The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new ADCoach security79
InternalOn-field fitExternal
Internal · how the program talkscoming

How the team talks in press conferences and interviews, each program against its own normal, so a naturally terse coach isn't read as upset. Being built program by program, Big Ten first.

▸Alignment
Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one page
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.
▸Resilience
Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversity
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.

Readings are team-level; we don't publish psychological readings of individual players.

On-field fit · how it is playing togetherlive

How the team is playing together this season: beating or missing its preseason expectation, a settled lineup, clean execution.

▸Playing above its parts
Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by game
67
This season67
+1.4 points a game vs its preseason projection (5 games)
▸Settled & sharp
A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normal
60
This season60
87% of starters kept game to game
External · pressure from outsidelive

Pressure from outside the building: the hard-facts hot seat now; this season's fan and media mood as it is measured.

▸Fan & media mood
Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins later
70
This season70
outside the AP poll: projected #52 preseason -> #42 in our Index now · results 4-2 (+2, recent games count more)
▸Coach security
The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new AD
79
This season79
James Franklin, year 1 · 67% wins so far · +1.4 pts a game vs preseason expectation · new athletic director

Dashed gold ring = typical (62). 20-50 is the warning zone; under 10 is a collapse. Spokes with no data yet are dashed and left out until they fill in. Chem blends the two halves, then places the blend among this season's teams.

Trend · Foundationeach program year runs Feb 1 to the title game
'1662'1763'1857'1964'2062'2172'2248'2369'2467'2565'262016 wk 1 vs Liberty: 66 · W2016 wk 2 vs Tennessee: 74 · L2016 wk 3 vs Boston College: 65 · W2016 wk 4 vs East Carolina: 75 · W2016 wk 6 vs North Carolina: 76 · W2016 wk 7 vs Syracuse: 78 · L2016 wk 8 vs Miami: 78 · W2016 wk 9 vs Pittsburgh: 73 · W2016 wk 10 vs Duke: 75 · W2016 wk 11 vs Georgia Tech: 70 · L2016 wk 12 vs Notre Dame: 68 · W2016 wk 13 vs Virginia: 66 · W2016 wk 14 vs Clemson: 64 · L2016 wk 1 vs Arkansas: 62 · W2017 wk 2 vs Delaware: 66 · W2017 wk 3 vs East Carolina: 64 · W2017 wk 4 vs Old Dominion: 67 · W2017 wk 5 vs Clemson: 65 · L2017 wk 6 vs Boston College: 66 · W2017 wk 8 vs North Carolina: 68 · W2017 wk 9 vs Duke: 67 · W2017 wk 10 vs Miami: 66 · L2017 wk 11 vs Georgia Tech: 65 · L2017 wk 12 vs Pittsburgh: 64 · W2017 wk 13 vs Virginia: 65 · W2017 wk 1 vs Oklahoma State: 63 · L2018 wk 2 vs William & Mary: 61 · W2018 wk 4 vs Old Dominion: 59 · L2018 wk 5 vs Duke: 58 · W2018 wk 6 vs Notre Dame: 57 · L2018 wk 7 vs North Carolina: 57 · W2018 wk 9 vs Georgia Tech: 57 · L2018 wk 10 vs Boston College: 59 · L2018 wk 11 vs Pittsburgh: 61 · L2018 wk 12 vs Miami: 59 · L2018 wk 13 vs Virginia: 59 · W2018 wk 14 vs Marshall: 58 · W2018 wk 1 vs Cincinnati: 57 · L2019 wk 2 vs Old Dominion: 71 · W2019 wk 3 vs Furman: 68 · W2019 wk 5 vs Duke: 67 · L2019 wk 6 vs Miami: 68 · W2019 wk 7 vs Rhode Island: 68 · W2019 wk 8 vs North Carolina: 67 · W2019 wk 10 vs Notre Dame: 64 · L2019 wk 11 vs Wake Forest: 64 · W2019 wk 12 vs Georgia Tech: 67 · W2019 wk 13 vs Pittsburgh: 67 · W2019 wk 14 vs Virginia: 65 · L2019 wk 1 vs Kentucky: 64 · L2020 wk 5 vs Duke: 64 · W2020 wk 6 vs North Carolina: 67 · L2020 wk 7 vs Boston College: 66 · W2020 wk 8 vs Wake Forest: 65 · L2020 wk 9 vs Louisville: 67 · W2020 wk 10 vs Liberty: 65 · L2020 wk 11 vs Miami: 63 · L2020 wk 12 vs Pittsburgh: 63 · L2020 wk 14 vs Clemson: 65 · L2020 wk 15 vs Virginia: 62 · W2021 wk 2 vs Middle Tennessee: 72 · W2021 wk 3 vs West Virginia: 72 · L2021 wk 4 vs Richmond: 73 · W2021 wk 6 vs Notre Dame: 71 · L2021 wk 7 vs Pittsburgh: 72 · L2021 wk 8 vs Syracuse: 72 · L2021 wk 9 vs Georgia Tech: 72 · W2021 wk 10 vs Boston College: 71 · L2021 wk 11 vs Duke: 73 · W2021 wk 12 vs Miami: 70 · L2021 wk 13 vs Virginia: 68 · W2021 wk 1 vs Maryland: 72 · L2022 wk 2 vs Boston College: 41 · W2022 wk 3 vs Wofford: 47 · W2022 wk 4 vs West Virginia: 40 · L2022 wk 5 vs North Carolina: 49 · L2022 wk 6 vs Pittsburgh: 48 · L2022 wk 7 vs Miami: 48 · L2022 wk 9 vs NC State: 47 · L2022 wk 10 vs Georgia Tech: 48 · L2022 wk 11 vs Duke: 42 · L2022 wk 12 vs Liberty: 48 · W2023 wk 2 vs Purdue: 66 · L2023 wk 3 vs Rutgers: 66 · L2023 wk 4 vs Marshall: 61 · L2023 wk 5 vs Pittsburgh: 64 · W2023 wk 6 vs Florida State: 65 · L2023 wk 7 vs Wake Forest: 65 · W2023 wk 9 vs Syracuse: 66 · W2023 wk 10 vs Louisville: 68 · L2023 wk 11 vs Boston College: 68 · W2023 wk 12 vs NC State: 68 · L2023 wk 13 vs Virginia: 69 · W2023 wk 1 vs Tulane: 69 · W2024 wk 2 vs Marshall: 69 · W2024 wk 3 vs Old Dominion: 74 · W2024 wk 4 vs Rutgers: 73 · L2024 wk 5 vs Miami: 74 · L2024 wk 6 vs Stanford: 73 · W2024 wk 8 vs Boston College: 74 · W2024 wk 9 vs Georgia Tech: 74 · W2024 wk 10 vs Syracuse: 74 · L2024 wk 11 vs Clemson: 68 · L2024 wk 13 vs Duke: 74 · L2024 wk 14 vs Virginia: 69 · W2024 wk 1 vs Minnesota: 67 · L2025 wk 2 vs Vanderbilt: 64 · L2025 wk 3 vs Old Dominion: 63 · L2025 wk 4 vs Wofford: 63 · W2025 wk 5 vs NC State: 63 · W2025 wk 6 vs Wake Forest: 64 · L2025 wk 7 vs Georgia Tech: 64 · L2025 wk 9 vs California: 63 · W2025 wk 10 vs Louisville: 64 · L2025 wk 12 vs Florida State: 64 · L2025 wk 13 vs Miami: 64 · L2025 wk 14 vs Virginia: 65 · L2026 wk 2 vs Old Dominion: 60 · W2026 wk 3 vs Maryland: 61 · W2026 wk 4 vs Boston College: 62 · W2026 wk 5 vs Pittsburgh: 60 · L2026 wk 6 vs California: 61 · L2026 wk 7 vs Georgia Tech: 63 · next gametypical 62

Every game since 2016, one continuous line; thin rules separate seasons and the chip is where each season finished. Navy dot = win, red = loss. Big drops usually mean a new staff, a new quarterback or a rebuilt line.

Trend · Gelthis season, after each game
typical 62wk 2 vs Old Dominion · W · on-field 56 · fan mood 82662wk 3 vs Maryland · W · on-field 63 · fan mood 93743wk 4 vs Boston College · W · on-field 68 · fan mood 88754wk 5 vs Pittsburgh · L · on-field 55 · fan mood 75635wk 6 vs California · L · on-field 61 · fan mood 70656

How the team is working right now, rebuilt after each game from only the games so far: on-field fit (results vs preseason expectation, lineup settling, execution) and that week's fan & media mood. Coach security is part of today's Gel number but isn't rebuilt week by week yet. Navy frame = win, red = loss.

Continuity facts
Head coach
Year 1
new this season
Offensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
Defensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
HC & OC together
1 seasons
working together
QB with his OC
1 seasons
same play-caller
QB & receivers
5.3 games
started together, average
Offensive line pairs
7.3 games
started together, average
Returning starters
64%
from last season
Starter experience
13 starts
career average
Internal facts
Pressers read
soon
this season, coaches and players
Coach tone
soon
vs his own normal
"We" vs "I"
soon
share of team language
Owning mistakes
soon
vs pointing outward
Same story
soon
coaches and players agree
After losses
soon
how fast tone recovers
Leaders named
soon
players teammates point to
Newcomers
soon
transfers talked about as part of it
Openness
soon
forthcoming vs guarded
Measured from press conferences and interviews, program by program.
Climate facts
Athletic director
Brian White
year 1
Football spending
$37.8M
2024-25 federal report
Spending trend
+0%
over three years
Department revenue
$152M
all sports
Recruiting spend
$2.70M
men's teams
Home crowds
—
of capacity
Staff turnover
77%
on-field staff new this season
Fan mood
soon
fans and local media
Coach & AD
soon
on the same page
Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Offense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Grunkemeyer
Overton
Greene
Brown
Brown
Reynolds
Cunningham
Ghannam
Altuner
Lynch
Troutman
QBEthan Grunkemeyer62546646563
RBJeffrey Overton Jr.23222213332
WRAyden Greene521835581415142
WRDavion Brown42344424443
WRQue'Sean Brown62546646563
TELuke Reynolds62546646563
OLMontavious Cunningham41824486761
OLLayth Ghannam631446661815143
OLKyle Altuner531545571517153
OLAidan Lynch631446661415163
OLMichael Troutman III32233313333

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Defense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Fall
Stevens
Copeland
Harris
Wylie
Spencer
Chambers
Flowers
Williams
Reddish
White
DLElhadj Fall126126691012866
DLAycen Stevens66666566266
DLKemari Copeland12618661012181296
DLCortez Harris66666566266
LBKeon Wylie66666566266
LBKaleb Spencer95105511710765
LBNoah Chambers106126671212866
DBTyson Flowers12618661012181296
DBThomas Williams82122278121342
DBQuentin Reddish669666694106
DBJaquez White66666566266

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Chemistry is Scorebook's own rating of how well a program fits together, on the same all-time 0-99 scale as our other ratings (compared with every FBS team since 2016; 62 is typical, 20-50 signals something is wrong, and single digits are reserved for true collapses; each season is compared with its own era). This early version blends continuity (who has played and coached together, and for how long; it counts most) with the climate around the program; how the program talks joins as it is measured. Within continuity, quarterback-centered pairings count most because they held up when we tested them against results. How our ratings work →