Scorebook
Join
Teams / American Athletic / Temple
Index · this season
55
▲ Above its 5-year level +10
Career57since 1936
Peak831979
Last 545seasons
#103 nationally · 2-4 (1-1 conf)
Résumé #114 · better than its record
Schedule so far #86
Margin ±5 pts (tightens with games)
Why 55? →

Temple Owls

American Athletic · Philadelphia, PA · Lincoln Financial Field · Head coach K.C. Keeler
Rival
Building rivalry
9-11 all time (20 meetings since 1988)
Navy leads
Last: lost 32-31 (2025) · Navy has won 2 straight
Wants it back
program traits are earned from history
No recognized national titles since 1936. Counted: AP poll champion, a coaches-poll champion, or the BCS / playoff title-game winner; a split year counts for both.0national titles
Heisman Trophy winners0Heisman
Seasons finishing in the AP top 10 since 19360AP top-10
Consensus All-Americans since 19363All-Americans
NFL draft picks since 196741NFL picks
Winning percentage since 193640.4%win pct
History since 1936 · football since 1927. Every season →
Chemistry
Chem 59: typical59
Chem 55: typical
55Foundation
Chem 65: typical
65Gel
gel counts 45% so far
▲ Above its norm +10
early · #63 of 138
HC year2
Ret. starters46%
QB yrs w/ OC1
View chemistry →
Team chemistryearly · #63 of 138 FBS teams
Chem 55: typicalFoundation55+Chem 65: typicalGel65=Chem 59: typicalChem59Gel counts 45% so far (it grows as games are played, up to half)
Foundationwhat the program has built · moves over seasons
Foundation55Staff stability — Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnoverStaff stability54Roster continuity — Returning starters and the lineup's experienceRoster continuity66Unit cohesion — QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played togetherUnit cohesion62Administration — Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignmentAdministration65Investment — Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruitingInvestment49Fan base — How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matterFan base32
ContinuityClimate
Continuity · who has played and coached togetherlive

Who has played and coached together, and for how long, ranked against every FBS team at the same point of the season.

▸Staff stability
Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnover
54
Staff cohesion54
HC year 2 · OC year 2 · DC year 2
▸Roster continuity
Returning starters and the lineup's experience
66
Returning core74
45% of last season's starters · FBS median 32%
Experience59
11 career starts per starter · FBS median 12
▸Unit cohesion
QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played together
62
QB & coordinator55
1st season together · same as 76% of FBS teams
QB & receivers56
3.5 games started together on average · FBS median 3.9
Line cohesion74
6.9 games per linemen pair · FBS median 5.2
Defensive cohesion69
5.0 games per defensive pair · FBS median 4.5
Climate · around the programlive

The administration, money and fans around the team: athletic director continuity, willingness to invest, and crowds.

▸Administration
Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignment
65
AD continuity65
Arthur Johnson · year 5 (Wikipedia, CC BY-SA)
▸Investment
Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruiting
49
Football's share80
37% of department spending goes to football
Investment trend14
-9% over three years
Football investment61
$26.3M on football (2024-25 federal report)
Recruiting spend47
$0.62M men's recruiting
Department resources58
$71M athletic department revenue
▸Fan base
How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matter
32
Sellouts30
sellout crowds (95%+ of capacity) at 0 of 43 home games (last 8 seasons)
Sells out anyway34
sellout crowds at 0 of 38 games that didn't matter: cupcakes, or a team expected to lose or having a losing season

Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures, as reported by each school. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA). Attendance: reported crowds vs stadium capacity.

Gelhow it is working right now · moves week to week
Gel65Playing above its parts — Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by gamePlaying above its parts68Settled & sharp — A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normalSettled & sharp69Alignment — Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one pageAlignmentsoonResilience — Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversityResiliencesoonFan & media mood — Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins laterFan & media mood62Coach security — The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new ADCoach security59
InternalOn-field fitExternal
Internal · how the program talkscoming

How the team talks in press conferences and interviews, each program against its own normal, so a naturally terse coach isn't read as upset. Being built program by program, Big Ten first.

▸Alignment
Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one page
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.
▸Resilience
Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversity
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.

Readings are team-level; we don't publish psychological readings of individual players.

On-field fit · how it is playing togetherlive

How the team is playing together this season: beating or missing its preseason expectation, a settled lineup, clean execution.

▸Playing above its parts
Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by game
68
This season68
+2 points a game vs its preseason projection (5 games)
▸Settled & sharp
A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normal
69
This season69
83% of starters kept game to game
External · pressure from outsidelive

Pressure from outside the building: the hard-facts hot seat now; this season's fan and media mood as it is measured.

▸Fan & media mood
Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins later
62
This season62
outside the AP poll: projected #110 preseason -> #103 in our Index now · results 2-4 (-3, recent games count more)
▸Coach security
The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new AD
59
This season59
K.C. Keeler, year 2 · 33% wins so far · +2.0 pts a game vs preseason expectation · last two seasons -7% vs the program's norm

Dashed gold ring = typical (62). 20-50 is the warning zone; under 10 is a collapse. Spokes with no data yet are dashed and left out until they fill in. Chem blends the two halves, then places the blend among this season's teams.

Trend · Foundationeach program year runs Feb 1 to the title game
'1671'1728'1860'1967'2054'2150'2219'2357'2449'2534'262016 wk 1 vs Army: 69 · L2016 wk 2 vs Stony Brook: 79 · W2016 wk 3 vs Penn State: 64 · L2016 wk 4 vs Charlotte: 72 · W2016 wk 5 vs SMU: 69 · W2016 wk 6 vs Memphis: 71 · L2016 wk 7 vs UCF: 74 · W2016 wk 8 vs South Florida: 75 · W2016 wk 9 vs Cincinnati: 74 · W2016 wk 10 vs UConn: 75 · W2016 wk 12 vs Tulane: 75 · W2016 wk 13 vs East Carolina: 73 · W2016 wk 14 vs Navy: 72 · W2016 wk 1 vs Wake Forest: 71 · L2017 wk 2 vs Villanova: 18 · W2017 wk 3 vs Massachusetts: 21 · W2017 wk 4 vs South Florida: 19 · L2017 wk 5 vs Houston: 20 · L2017 wk 6 vs East Carolina: 30 · W2017 wk 7 vs UConn: 30 · L2017 wk 8 vs Army: 32 · L2017 wk 10 vs Navy: 30 · W2017 wk 11 vs Cincinnati: 14 · W2017 wk 12 vs UCF: 17 · L2017 wk 13 vs Tulsa: 30 · W2017 wk 1 vs Florida International: 28 · W2018 wk 2 vs Buffalo: 60 · L2018 wk 3 vs Maryland: 61 · W2018 wk 4 vs Tulsa: 57 · W2018 wk 5 vs Boston College: 58 · L2018 wk 6 vs East Carolina: 58 · W2018 wk 7 vs Navy: 59 · W2018 wk 8 vs Cincinnati: 60 · W2018 wk 10 vs UCF: 61 · L2018 wk 11 vs Houston: 62 · W2018 wk 12 vs South Florida: 59 · W2018 wk 13 vs UConn: 59 · W2018 wk 1 vs Duke: 60 · L2019 wk 3 vs Maryland: 70 · W2019 wk 4 vs Buffalo: 69 · L2019 wk 5 vs Georgia Tech: 70 · W2019 wk 6 vs East Carolina: 70 · W2019 wk 7 vs Memphis: 72 · W2019 wk 8 vs SMU: 70 · L2019 wk 9 vs UCF: 71 · L2019 wk 11 vs South Florida: 67 · W2019 wk 12 vs Tulane: 70 · W2019 wk 13 vs Cincinnati: 65 · L2019 wk 14 vs UConn: 70 · W2019 wk 1 vs North Carolina: 67 · L2020 wk 7 vs South Florida: 56 · W2020 wk 8 vs Memphis: 58 · L2020 wk 9 vs Tulane: 57 · L2020 wk 10 vs SMU: 50 · L2020 wk 11 vs UCF: 52 · L2020 wk 12 vs East Carolina: 54 · L2021 wk 2 vs Akron: 57 · W2021 wk 3 vs Boston College: 55 · L2021 wk 4 vs Wagner: 57 · W2021 wk 5 vs Memphis: 57 · W2021 wk 6 vs Cincinnati: 57 · L2021 wk 8 vs South Florida: 57 · L2021 wk 9 vs UCF: 56 · L2021 wk 10 vs East Carolina: 54 · L2021 wk 11 vs Houston: 54 · L2021 wk 12 vs Tulsa: 54 · L2021 wk 13 vs Navy: 50 · L2022 wk 2 vs Lafayette: 21 · W2022 wk 3 vs Rutgers: 20 · L2022 wk 4 vs Massachusetts: 3 · W2022 wk 5 vs Memphis: 8 · L2022 wk 7 vs UCF: 20 · L2022 wk 8 vs Tulsa: 21 · L2022 wk 9 vs Navy: 22 · L2022 wk 10 vs South Florida: 14 · W2022 wk 11 vs Houston: 21 · L2022 wk 12 vs Cincinnati: 22 · L2022 wk 13 vs East Carolina: 19 · L2023 wk 2 vs Rutgers: 59 · L2023 wk 3 vs Norfolk State: 60 · W2023 wk 4 vs Miami: 59 · L2023 wk 5 vs Tulsa: 57 · L2023 wk 6 vs UTSA: 59 · L2023 wk 7 vs North Texas: 58 · L2023 wk 8 vs SMU: 55 · L2023 wk 10 vs Navy: 51 · W2023 wk 11 vs South Florida: 59 · L2023 wk 12 vs UAB: 59 · L2023 wk 13 vs Memphis: 57 · L2024 wk 2 vs Navy: 51 · L2024 wk 3 vs Coastal Carolina: 51 · L2024 wk 4 vs Utah State: 45 · W2024 wk 5 vs Army: 45 · L2024 wk 6 vs UConn: 48 · L2024 wk 8 vs Tulsa: 46 · W2024 wk 9 vs East Carolina: 49 · L2024 wk 11 vs Tulane: 48 · L2024 wk 12 vs Florida Atlantic: 46 · W2024 wk 13 vs UTSA: 48 · L2024 wk 14 vs North Texas: 49 · L2025 wk 2 vs Howard: 33 · W2025 wk 3 vs Oklahoma: 35 · L2025 wk 4 vs Georgia Tech: 35 · L2025 wk 6 vs UTSA: 34 · W2025 wk 7 vs Navy: 35 · L2025 wk 8 vs Charlotte: 35 · W2025 wk 9 vs Tulsa: 33 · W2025 wk 10 vs East Carolina: 35 · L2025 wk 11 vs Army: 35 · L2025 wk 13 vs Tulane: 33 · L2025 wk 14 vs North Texas: 34 · L2026 wk 2 vs Penn State: 53 · L2026 wk 3 vs Toledo: 54 · L2026 wk 4 vs Army: 54 · L2026 wk 5 vs South Florida: 52 · W2026 wk 6 vs UConn: 52 · L2026 wk 7 vs Charlotte: 55 · next gametypical 62

Every game since 2016, one continuous line; thin rules separate seasons and the chip is where each season finished. Navy dot = win, red = loss. Big drops usually mean a new staff, a new quarterback or a rebuilt line.

Trend · Gelthis season, after each game
typical 62wk 2 vs Penn State · L · on-field 57 · fan mood 65602wk 3 vs Toledo · L · on-field 67 · fan mood 71683wk 4 vs Army · L · on-field 64 · fan mood 64644wk 5 vs South Florida · W · on-field 65 · fan mood 76695wk 6 vs UConn · L · on-field 68 · fan mood 73706

How the team is working right now, rebuilt after each game from only the games so far: on-field fit (results vs preseason expectation, lineup settling, execution) and that week's fan & media mood. Coach security is part of today's Gel number but isn't rebuilt week by week yet. Navy frame = win, red = loss.

Continuity facts
Head coach
Year 2
at this school
Offensive coordinator
Year 2
at this school
Defensive coordinator
Year 2
at this school
HC & OC together
2 seasons
working together
QB with his OC
1 seasons
same play-caller
QB & receivers
3.5 games
started together, average
Offensive line pairs
6.9 games
started together, average
Returning starters
45%
from last season
Starter experience
11 starts
career average
Internal facts
Pressers read
soon
this season, coaches and players
Coach tone
soon
vs his own normal
"We" vs "I"
soon
share of team language
Owning mistakes
soon
vs pointing outward
Same story
soon
coaches and players agree
After losses
soon
how fast tone recovers
Leaders named
soon
players teammates point to
Newcomers
soon
transfers talked about as part of it
Openness
soon
forthcoming vs guarded
Measured from press conferences and interviews, program by program.
Climate facts
Athletic director
Arthur Johnson
year 5
Football spending
$26.3M
2024-25 federal report
Spending trend
-9%
over three years
Department revenue
$71M
all sports
Recruiting spend
$0.62M
men's teams
Home crowds
—
of capacity
Staff turnover
—
on-field staff new this season
Fan mood
soon
fans and local media
Coach & AD
soon
on the same page
Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Offense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Sheppard
Mason
Bermudez
Freeman
Chase
Clarke
Mains
Pruitt
Stone
Aamland
Watkins
QBAjani Sheppard43244444433
RBKeveun Mason35455555555
WRJoJo Bermudez2414414121314444
WRJayce Freeman45466666655
WRColin Chase4514618161718655
TEPeter Clarke4512616211717655
OLGrayson Mains4513617172622655
OLJackson Pruitt4514618172226655
OLJohn Stone45466666655
OLZach Aamland35455555555
OLJohn Watkins35455555555

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Defense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Auzenne
Jones
Hornbeak
Joseph
Stuart
Ordonez
Karriem
Powell
Chavis
Powell
Locks
DLJoseph Auzenne65665653556
DLCameron Jones57554742545
DLKevin Hornbeak Jr.65665653556
LBJaylon Joseph65665653556
LBEric Stuart5455131042495
LBCurly Ordonez67661018546146
DBSaboor Karriem54554553445
DBZyil Powell32332434233
DBDenzel Chavis55554642955
DBAvery Powell5455914435145
DBAsa Locks65665653556

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Chemistry is Scorebook's own rating of how well a program fits together, on the same all-time 0-99 scale as our other ratings (compared with every FBS team since 2016; 62 is typical, 20-50 signals something is wrong, and single digits are reserved for true collapses; each season is compared with its own era). This early version blends continuity (who has played and coached together, and for how long; it counts most) with the climate around the program; how the program talks joins as it is measured. Within continuity, quarterback-centered pairings count most because they held up when we tested them against results. How our ratings work →