Scorebook
Join
Teams / ACC / Syracuse
Index · this season
64
at its 5-year level▼ Down 3 this season
Career67since 1936
Peak921959
Last 566seasons
#68 nationally · 2-3 (0-3 conf)
Résumé #88 · better than its record
Schedule so far #79
Margin ±5 pts (tightens with games)
Why 64? →

Syracuse Orange

ACC · Syracuse, NY · JMA Wireless Dome · Head coach Fran Brown
Rival
Heated rivalry
33-46-3 all time (82 meetings since 1916)
Pittsburgh leads
Last: lost 27-13 (2026) · Pittsburgh has won 3 straight
Wants it back
program traits are earned from history
Recognized national titles: 1959. Counted: AP poll champion, a coaches-poll champion, or the BCS / playoff title-game winner; a split year counts for both.1national titles
Heisman Trophy winners1Heisman
Seasons finishing in the AP top 10 since 19365AP top-10
Consensus All-Americans since 193610All-Americans
NFL draft picks since 196799NFL picks
Winning percentage since 193652.4%win pct
History since 1936 · football since 1891. Every season →
Chemistry
Chem 44: warning zone44
Chem 51: typical
51Foundation
Chem 34: warning zone
34Gel
gel counts 40% so far
▼ Below its norm -11Trending down
early · #120 of 138
HC year3
Ret. starters36%
QB yrs w/ OC1
View chemistry →
Team chemistryearly · #120 of 138 FBS teams
Chem 51: typicalFoundation51+Chem 34: warning zoneGel34=Chem 44: warning zoneChem44Gel counts 40% so far (it grows as games are played, up to half)
Foundationwhat the program has built · moves over seasons
Foundation51Staff stability — Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnoverStaff stability47Roster continuity — Returning starters and the lineup's experienceRoster continuity56Unit cohesion — QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played togetherUnit cohesion39Administration — Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignmentAdministration30Investment — Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruitingInvestment76Fan base — How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matterFan base56
ContinuityClimate
Continuity · who has played and coached togetherlive

Who has played and coached together, and for how long, ranked against every FBS team at the same point of the season.

▸Staff stability
Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnover
47
Staff cohesion47
HC year 3 · OC year 3 · DC year 1
▸Roster continuity
Returning starters and the lineup's experience
56
Returning core65
36% of last season's starters · FBS median 32%
Experience47
9 career starts per starter · FBS median 12
▸Unit cohesion
QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played together
39
QB & coordinator55
1st season together · same as 76% of FBS teams
QB & receivers18
1.0 games started together on average · FBS median 3.9
Line cohesion50
4.0 games per linemen pair · FBS median 5.2
Defensive cohesion36
3.4 games per defensive pair · FBS median 4.5
Climate · around the programlive

The administration, money and fans around the team: athletic director continuity, willingness to invest, and crowds.

▸Administration
Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignment
30
AD continuity30
Bryan Blair · year 1 (Wikipedia, CC BY-SA)
▸Investment
Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruiting
76
Football's share87
39% of department spending goes to football
Investment trend73
+50% over three years
Football investment70
$42.1M on football (2024-25 federal report)
Recruiting spend65
$1.66M men's recruiting
Department resources64
$121M athletic department revenue
▸Fan base
How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matter
56
Sellouts55
sellout crowds (95%+ of capacity) at 3 of 44 home games (last 8 seasons)
Sells out anyway57
sellout crowds at 3 of 39 games that didn't matter: cupcakes, or a team expected to lose or having a losing season

Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures, as reported by each school. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA). Attendance: reported crowds vs stadium capacity.

Gelhow it is working right now · moves week to week
Gel34Playing above its parts — Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by gamePlaying above its parts46Settled & sharp — A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normalSettled & sharp23Alignment — Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one pageAlignmentsoonResilience — Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversityResiliencesoonFan & media mood — Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins laterFan & media mood42Coach security — The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new ADCoach security38
InternalOn-field fitExternal
Internal · how the program talkscoming

How the team talks in press conferences and interviews, each program against its own normal, so a naturally terse coach isn't read as upset. Being built program by program, Big Ten first.

▸Alignment
Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one page
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.
▸Resilience
Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversity
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.

Readings are team-level; we don't publish psychological readings of individual players.

On-field fit · how it is playing togetherlive

How the team is playing together this season: beating or missing its preseason expectation, a settled lineup, clean execution.

▸Playing above its parts
Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by game
46
This season46
-4.2 points a game vs its preseason projection (4 games)
▸Settled & sharp
A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normal
23
This season23
75% of starters kept game to game
External · pressure from outsidelive

Pressure from outside the building: the hard-facts hot seat now; this season's fan and media mood as it is measured.

▸Fan & media mood
Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins later
42
This season42
outside the AP poll: projected #59 preseason -> #68 in our Index now · lost to rival Pittsburgh 27-13 (-7) · results 2-3 (-0, recent games count more)
▸Coach security
The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new AD
38
This season38
Fran Brown, year 3 · 40% wins so far · -4.2 pts a game vs preseason expectation · last two seasons +12% vs the program's norm · new athletic director

Dashed gold ring = typical (62). 20-50 is the warning zone; under 10 is a collapse. Spokes with no data yet are dashed and left out until they fill in. Chem blends the two halves, then places the blend among this season's teams.

Trend · Foundationeach program year runs Feb 1 to the title game
'1645'1766'1865'1964'2036'2158'2260'2364'2434'2556'262016 wk 1 vs Colgate: 52 · W2016 wk 2 vs Louisville: 70 · L2016 wk 3 vs South Florida: 56 · L2016 wk 4 vs UConn: 61 · W2016 wk 5 vs Notre Dame: 53 · L2016 wk 6 vs Wake Forest: 58 · L2016 wk 7 vs Virginia Tech: 62 · W2016 wk 8 vs Boston College: 60 · W2016 wk 10 vs Clemson: 64 · L2016 wk 11 vs NC State: 62 · L2016 wk 12 vs Florida State: 44 · L2016 wk 13 vs Pittsburgh: 45 · L2017 wk 2 vs Middle Tennessee: 62 · L2017 wk 3 vs Central Michigan: 69 · W2017 wk 4 vs LSU: 70 · L2017 wk 5 vs NC State: 66 · L2017 wk 6 vs Pittsburgh: 68 · W2017 wk 7 vs Clemson: 70 · W2017 wk 8 vs Miami: 68 · L2017 wk 10 vs Florida State: 67 · L2017 wk 11 vs Wake Forest: 68 · L2017 wk 12 vs Louisville: 62 · L2017 wk 13 vs Boston College: 66 · L2018 wk 2 vs Wagner: 66 · W2018 wk 3 vs Florida State: 66 · W2018 wk 4 vs UConn: 67 · W2018 wk 5 vs Clemson: 66 · L2018 wk 6 vs Pittsburgh: 66 · L2018 wk 8 vs North Carolina: 65 · W2018 wk 9 vs NC State: 66 · W2018 wk 10 vs Wake Forest: 66 · W2018 wk 11 vs Louisville: 65 · W2018 wk 12 vs Notre Dame: 63 · L2018 wk 13 vs Boston College: 62 · W2018 wk 1 vs West Virginia: 65 · W2019 wk 2 vs Maryland: 64 · L2019 wk 3 vs Clemson: 69 · L2019 wk 4 vs Western Michigan: 63 · W2019 wk 5 vs Holy Cross: 64 · W2019 wk 7 vs NC State: 65 · L2019 wk 8 vs Pittsburgh: 70 · L2019 wk 9 vs Florida State: 70 · L2019 wk 10 vs Boston College: 64 · L2019 wk 12 vs Duke: 70 · W2019 wk 13 vs Louisville: 70 · L2019 wk 14 vs Wake Forest: 64 · W2020 wk 4 vs Georgia Tech: 44 · W2020 wk 6 vs Duke: 41 · L2020 wk 7 vs Liberty: 40 · L2020 wk 8 vs Clemson: 38 · L2020 wk 9 vs Wake Forest: 38 · L2020 wk 10 vs Boston College: 40 · L2020 wk 12 vs Louisville: 41 · L2020 wk 13 vs NC State: 40 · L2020 wk 14 vs Notre Dame: 36 · L2021 wk 2 vs Rutgers: 59 · L2021 wk 3 vs UAlbany: 59 · W2021 wk 4 vs Liberty: 58 · W2021 wk 5 vs Florida State: 56 · L2021 wk 6 vs Wake Forest: 57 · L2021 wk 7 vs Clemson: 58 · L2021 wk 8 vs Virginia Tech: 60 · W2021 wk 9 vs Boston College: 60 · W2021 wk 11 vs Louisville: 59 · L2021 wk 12 vs NC State: 60 · L2021 wk 13 vs Pittsburgh: 58 · L2022 wk 2 vs UConn: 63 · W2022 wk 3 vs Purdue: 61 · W2022 wk 4 vs Virginia: 62 · W2022 wk 5 vs Wagner: 62 · W2022 wk 7 vs NC State: 62 · W2022 wk 8 vs Clemson: 64 · L2022 wk 9 vs Notre Dame: 63 · L2022 wk 10 vs Pittsburgh: 64 · L2022 wk 11 vs Florida State: 54 · L2022 wk 12 vs Wake Forest: 63 · L2022 wk 13 vs Boston College: 56 · W2022 wk 1 vs Minnesota: 60 · L2023 wk 2 vs Western Michigan: 66 · W2023 wk 3 vs Purdue: 66 · W2023 wk 4 vs Army: 65 · W2023 wk 5 vs Clemson: 66 · L2023 wk 6 vs North Carolina: 66 · L2023 wk 7 vs Florida State: 66 · L2023 wk 9 vs Virginia Tech: 66 · L2023 wk 10 vs Boston College: 66 · L2023 wk 11 vs Pittsburgh: 57 · W2023 wk 12 vs Georgia Tech: 66 · L2023 wk 13 vs Wake Forest: 57 · W2023 wk 1 vs South Florida: 64 · L2024 wk 2 vs Georgia Tech: 38 · W2024 wk 4 vs Stanford: 37 · L2024 wk 5 vs Holy Cross: 35 · W2024 wk 6 vs UNLV: 38 · W2024 wk 7 vs NC State: 39 · W2024 wk 9 vs Pittsburgh: 39 · L2024 wk 10 vs Virginia Tech: 41 · W2024 wk 11 vs Boston College: 39 · L2024 wk 12 vs California: 40 · W2024 wk 13 vs UConn: 36 · W2024 wk 14 vs Miami: 37 · W2024 wk 1 vs Washington State: 34 · W2025 wk 2 vs UConn: 58 · W2025 wk 3 vs Colgate: 60 · W2025 wk 4 vs Clemson: 62 · W2025 wk 5 vs Duke: 61 · L2025 wk 6 vs SMU: 56 · L2025 wk 8 vs Pittsburgh: 57 · L2025 wk 9 vs Georgia Tech: 61 · L2025 wk 10 vs North Carolina: 60 · L2025 wk 11 vs Miami: 55 · L2025 wk 13 vs Notre Dame: 58 · L2025 wk 14 vs Boston College: 56 · L2026 wk 2 vs California: 59 · L2026 wk 3 vs Pittsburgh: 58 · L2026 wk 5 vs UConn: 59 · W2026 wk 6 vs Virginia: 51 · L2026 wk 7 vs Louisville: 51 · next gametypical 62

Every game since 2016, one continuous line; thin rules separate seasons and the chip is where each season finished. Navy dot = win, red = loss. Big drops usually mean a new staff, a new quarterback or a rebuilt line.

Trend · Gelthis season, after each game
typical 62wk 2 vs California · L · on-field 33 · fan mood 54412wk 3 vs Pittsburgh · L · on-field 37 · fan mood 34363wk 5 vs UConn · W · on-field 27 · fan mood 44335wk 6 vs Virginia · L · on-field 27 · fan mood 42336

How the team is working right now, rebuilt after each game from only the games so far: on-field fit (results vs preseason expectation, lineup settling, execution) and that week's fan & media mood. Coach security is part of today's Gel number but isn't rebuilt week by week yet. Navy frame = win, red = loss.

Continuity facts
Head coach
Year 3
at this school
Offensive coordinator
Year 3
at this school
Defensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
HC & OC together
3 seasons
working together
QB with his OC
1 seasons
same play-caller
QB & receivers
1.0 games
started together, average
Offensive line pairs
4.0 games
started together, average
Returning starters
36%
from last season
Starter experience
9 starts
career average
Internal facts
Pressers read
soon
this season, coaches and players
Coach tone
soon
vs his own normal
"We" vs "I"
soon
share of team language
Owning mistakes
soon
vs pointing outward
Same story
soon
coaches and players agree
After losses
soon
how fast tone recovers
Leaders named
soon
players teammates point to
Newcomers
soon
transfers talked about as part of it
Openness
soon
forthcoming vs guarded
Measured from press conferences and interviews, program by program.
Climate facts
Athletic director
Bryan Blair
year 1
Football spending
$42.1M
2024-25 federal report
Spending trend
+50%
over three years
Department revenue
$121M
all sports
Recruiting spend
$1.66M
men's teams
Home crowds
—
of capacity
Staff turnover
—
on-field staff new this season
Fan mood
soon
fans and local media
Coach & AD
soon
on the same page
Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Offense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Nelson
Hill
Hatcher
Russell
Clement
Cruz
Pringle
Akinshilo
Mack
Mann
QBMalachi Nelson1111111111
RBTylik Hill1331333321
WRUmari Hatcher13221565532
WRCalvin Russell III1111111111
TEDavid Clement13511296572
OLJoe Cruz136192054121
OLKam Pringle1351656542
OLOluwafunto Akinshilo1351545532
OLTrevion Mack123171243132
OLJayden Mann1121212222

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Defense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Adeleye
Perry
Ogbebor
Moultrie-Goddard
D'Appolonia
Johnson
Peal
Eugene
Samuel
Johnson
Geter
DLTunmise Adeleye55515542541
DLRashard Perry59515542541
DLNissi Ogbebor55515542541
LBZyian Moultrie-Goddard11111111111
LBChris D'Appolonia55515542541
LBKeyshawn Johnson55515542541
DBChris Peal4441441621641
DBJai Eugene Jr.22212222221
DBDemetres Samuel Jr.5551551621751
DBDarius Johnson44414442551
DBChase Geter11111111111

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Chemistry is Scorebook's own rating of how well a program fits together, on the same all-time 0-99 scale as our other ratings (compared with every FBS team since 2016; 62 is typical, 20-50 signals something is wrong, and single digits are reserved for true collapses; each season is compared with its own era). This early version blends continuity (who has played and coached together, and for how long; it counts most) with the climate around the program; how the program talks joins as it is measured. Within continuity, quarterback-centered pairings count most because they held up when we tested them against results. How our ratings work →