Scorebook
Join
Teams / Sun Belt / Southern Miss
Index · this season
51
▲ Above its 5-year level +6
Career62since 1936
Peak791981
Last 545seasons
#127 nationally · 1-4 (0-1 conf)
Résumé #129
Schedule so far #101
Margin ±5 pts (tightens with games)
Why 51? →

Southern Miss Golden Eagles

Sun Belt · Hattiesburg, MS · M. M. Roberts Stadium · Head coach Blake Anderson
Rival
Building rivalry
20-13 all time (33 meetings since 1963)
Southern Miss leads
Last: lost 30-20 (2025)
Wants it back
program traits are earned from history
No recognized national titles since 1936. Counted: AP poll champion, a coaches-poll champion, or the BCS / playoff title-game winner; a split year counts for both.0national titles
Heisman Trophy winners0Heisman
Seasons finishing in the AP top 10 since 19360AP top-10
Consensus All-Americans since 19360All-Americans
NFL draft picks since 196756NFL picks
Winning percentage since 193653.9%win pct
History since 1936 · football since 1955. Every season →
Chemistry
Chem 47: new staff, still building47
Chem 47: warning zone
47Foundation
Chem 48: warning zone
48Gel
gel counts 40% so far
▲ Above its norm +5
early · #114 of 138
HC year1
Ret. starters9%
QB yrs w/ OC1
View chemistry →
Team chemistryearly · #114 of 138 FBS teams
Chem 47: warning zoneFoundation47+Chem 48: warning zoneGel48=Chem 47: warning zoneChem47Gel counts 40% so far (it grows as games are played, up to half)
Foundationwhat the program has built · moves over seasons
Foundation47Staff stability — Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnoverStaff stability55Roster continuity — Returning starters and the lineup's experienceRoster continuity26Unit cohesion — QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played togetherUnit cohesion47Administration — Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignmentAdministration72Investment — Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruitingInvestment60Fan base — How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matterFan base32
ContinuityClimate
Continuity · who has played and coached togetherlive

Who has played and coached together, and for how long, ranked against every FBS team at the same point of the season.

▸Staff stability
Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnover
55
Staff cohesion63
HC year 1 · OC year 1 · DC year 1
Assistant turnover47
62% of on-field staff new this season (FBS average about 45%)
▸Roster continuity
Returning starters and the lineup's experience
26
Returning core18
9% of last season's starters · FBS median 32%
Experience34
8 career starts per starter · FBS median 12
▸Unit cohesion
QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played together
47
QB & coordinator55
1st season together · same as 76% of FBS teams
QB & receivers33
1.8 games started together on average · FBS median 3.9
Line cohesion68
5.7 games per linemen pair · FBS median 5.2
Defensive cohesion35
3.4 games per defensive pair · FBS median 4.5
Climate · around the programlive

The administration, money and fans around the team: athletic director continuity, willingness to invest, and crowds.

▸Administration
Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignment
72
AD continuity72
Jeremy McClain · year 8 (Wikipedia, CC BY-SA)
▸Investment
Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruiting
60
Football's share74
35% of department spending goes to football
Investment trend67
+38% over three years
Football investment30
$11.0M on football (2024-25 federal report)
Recruiting spend42
$0.55M men's recruiting
Department resources14
$32M athletic department revenue
▸Fan base
How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matter
32
Sellouts30
sellout crowds (95%+ of capacity) at 0 of 40 home games (last 8 seasons)
Sells out anyway34
sellout crowds at 0 of 30 games that didn't matter: cupcakes, or a team expected to lose or having a losing season

Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures, as reported by each school. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA). Attendance: reported crowds vs stadium capacity.

Gelhow it is working right now · moves week to week
Gel48Playing above its parts — Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by gamePlaying above its parts49Settled & sharp — A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normalSettled & sharp61Alignment — Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one pageAlignmentsoonResilience — Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversityResiliencesoonFan & media mood — Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins laterFan & media mood41Coach security — The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new ADCoach security34
InternalOn-field fitExternal
Internal · how the program talkscoming

How the team talks in press conferences and interviews, each program against its own normal, so a naturally terse coach isn't read as upset. Being built program by program, Big Ten first.

▸Alignment
Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one page
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.
▸Resilience
Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversity
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.

Readings are team-level; we don't publish psychological readings of individual players.

On-field fit · how it is playing togetherlive

How the team is playing together this season: beating or missing its preseason expectation, a settled lineup, clean execution.

▸Playing above its parts
Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by game
49
This season49
-3.6 points a game vs its preseason projection (4 games)
▸Settled & sharp
A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normal
61
This season61
81% of starters kept game to game
External · pressure from outsidelive

Pressure from outside the building: the hard-facts hot seat now; this season's fan and media mood as it is measured.

▸Fan & media mood
Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins later
41
This season41
outside the AP poll: projected #122 preseason -> #127 in our Index now · lost to rival Tulane 24-21 (-5) · results 1-4 (-8, recent games count more)
▸Coach security
The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new AD
34
This season34
Blake Anderson, year 2 · 20% wins so far · -3.6 pts a game vs preseason expectation · last two seasons -46% vs the program's norm

Dashed gold ring = typical (62). 20-50 is the warning zone; under 10 is a collapse. Spokes with no data yet are dashed and left out until they fill in. Chem blends the two halves, then places the blend among this season's teams.

Trend · Foundationeach program year runs Feb 1 to the title game
'1620'1742'1844'1955'2045'2111'2263'2353'2443'2545'262016 wk 1 vs Kentucky: 20 · W2016 wk 2 vs Savannah State: 20 · W2016 wk 3 vs Troy: 20 · L2016 wk 4 vs UTEP: 13 · W2016 wk 5 vs Rice: 10 · W2016 wk 6 vs UTSA: 16 · L2016 wk 7 vs LSU: 13 · L2016 wk 9 vs Marshall: 10 · W2016 wk 10 vs Charlotte: 9 · L2016 wk 11 vs Old Dominion: 20 · L2016 wk 12 vs North Texas: 21 · L2016 wk 13 vs Louisiana Tech: 20 · W2016 wk 1 vs Louisiana: 20 · W2017 wk 5 vs North Texas: 41 · L2017 wk 6 vs UTSA: 43 · W2017 wk 7 vs UTEP: 43 · W2017 wk 8 vs Louisiana Tech: 43 · W2017 wk 9 vs UAB: 43 · L2017 wk 10 vs Tennessee: 43 · L2017 wk 11 vs Rice: 45 · W2017 wk 12 vs Charlotte: 46 · W2017 wk 13 vs Marshall: 45 · W2017 wk 1 vs Florida State: 42 · L2018 wk 2 vs UL Monroe: 44 · L2018 wk 4 vs Rice: 45 · W2018 wk 5 vs Auburn: 47 · L2018 wk 7 vs North Texas: 48 · L2018 wk 8 vs UTSA: 49 · W2018 wk 9 vs Charlotte: 47 · L2018 wk 10 vs Marshall: 48 · W2018 wk 11 vs UAB: 43 · L2018 wk 12 vs Louisiana Tech: 43 · W2018 wk 13 vs UTEP: 44 · W2019 wk 2 vs Mississippi State: 57 · L2019 wk 3 vs Troy: 58 · W2019 wk 4 vs Alabama: 57 · L2019 wk 5 vs UTEP: 57 · W2019 wk 7 vs North Texas: 57 · W2019 wk 8 vs Louisiana Tech: 58 · L2019 wk 9 vs Rice: 58 · W2019 wk 11 vs UAB: 59 · W2019 wk 12 vs UTSA: 58 · W2019 wk 13 vs Western Kentucky: 58 · L2019 wk 14 vs Florida Atlantic: 57 · L2019 wk 1 vs Tulane: 55 · L2020 wk 3 vs Louisiana Tech: 56 · L2020 wk 4 vs Tulane: 55 · L2020 wk 5 vs North Texas: 55 · W2020 wk 8 vs Liberty: 50 · L2020 wk 9 vs Rice: 49 · L2020 wk 10 vs North Alabama: 50 · W2020 wk 11 vs Western Kentucky: 40 · L2020 wk 12 vs UTSA: 45 · L2020 wk 15 vs Florida Atlantic: 45 · W2021 wk 2 vs Grambling: 29 · W2021 wk 3 vs Troy: 30 · L2021 wk 4 vs Alabama: 15 · L2021 wk 5 vs Rice: 13 · L2021 wk 6 vs UTEP: 26 · L2021 wk 7 vs UAB: 9 · L2021 wk 9 vs Middle Tennessee: 12 · L2021 wk 10 vs North Texas: 25 · L2021 wk 11 vs UTSA: 25 · L2021 wk 12 vs Louisiana Tech: 25 · W2021 wk 13 vs Florida International: 11 · W2022 wk 2 vs Miami: 63 · L2022 wk 3 vs Northwestern State: 61 · W2022 wk 4 vs Tulane: 61 · W2022 wk 6 vs Troy: 60 · L2022 wk 7 vs Arkansas State: 61 · W2022 wk 8 vs Texas State: 63 · W2022 wk 9 vs Louisiana: 62 · W2022 wk 10 vs Georgia State: 63 · L2022 wk 11 vs Coastal Carolina: 62 · L2022 wk 12 vs South Alabama: 61 · L2022 wk 13 vs UL Monroe: 62 · W2022 wk 1 vs Rice: 63 · W2023 wk 2 vs Florida State: 57 · L2023 wk 3 vs Tulane: 56 · L2023 wk 4 vs Arkansas State: 57 · L2023 wk 5 vs Texas State: 58 · L2023 wk 6 vs Old Dominion: 58 · L2023 wk 8 vs South Alabama: 55 · L2023 wk 9 vs App State: 54 · L2023 wk 10 vs UL Monroe: 57 · W2023 wk 11 vs Louisiana: 58 · W2023 wk 12 vs Mississippi State: 59 · L2023 wk 13 vs Troy: 53 · L2024 wk 2 vs SE Louisiana: 42 · W2024 wk 3 vs South Florida: 41 · L2024 wk 4 vs Jacksonville State: 44 · L2024 wk 6 vs Louisiana: 45 · L2024 wk 7 vs UL Monroe: 42 · L2024 wk 8 vs Arkansas State: 38 · L2024 wk 9 vs James Madison: 41 · L2024 wk 11 vs Marshall: 41 · L2024 wk 12 vs Texas State: 39 · L2024 wk 13 vs South Alabama: 42 · L2024 wk 14 vs Troy: 43 · L2025 wk 2 vs Jackson State: 44 · W2025 wk 3 vs App State: 44 · W2025 wk 4 vs Louisiana Tech: 46 · L2025 wk 5 vs Jacksonville State: 47 · W2025 wk 7 vs Georgia Southern: 45 · W2025 wk 8 vs Louisiana: 47 · W2025 wk 9 vs UL Monroe: 47 · W2025 wk 11 vs Arkansas State: 48 · W2025 wk 12 vs Texas State: 49 · L2025 wk 13 vs South Alabama: 45 · L2025 wk 14 vs Troy: 47 · L2025 wk 1 vs Western Kentucky: 45 · L2026 wk 2 vs Auburn: 47 · L2026 wk 3 vs UConn: 48 · L2026 wk 4 vs Tulane: 46 · L2026 wk 6 vs Troy: 46 · L2026 wk 7 vs Arkansas State: 47 · next gametypical 62

Every game since 2016, one continuous line; thin rules separate seasons and the chip is where each season finished. Navy dot = win, red = loss. Big drops usually mean a new staff, a new quarterback or a rebuilt line.

Trend · Gelthis season, after each game
typical 62wk 2 vs Auburn · L · on-field 52 · fan mood 60552wk 3 vs UConn · L · on-field 51 · fan mood 42483wk 4 vs Tulane · L · on-field 54 · fan mood 36474wk 6 vs Troy · L · on-field 58 · fan mood 39516

How the team is working right now, rebuilt after each game from only the games so far: on-field fit (results vs preseason expectation, lineup settling, execution) and that week's fan & media mood. Coach security is part of today's Gel number but isn't rebuilt week by week yet. Navy frame = win, red = loss.

Continuity facts
Head coach
Year 1
new this season
Offensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
Defensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
HC & OC together
1 seasons
working together
QB with his OC
1 seasons
same play-caller
QB & receivers
1.8 games
started together, average
Offensive line pairs
5.7 games
started together, average
Returning starters
9%
from last season
Starter experience
8 starts
career average
Internal facts
Pressers read
soon
this season, coaches and players
Coach tone
soon
vs his own normal
"We" vs "I"
soon
share of team language
Owning mistakes
soon
vs pointing outward
Same story
soon
coaches and players agree
After losses
soon
how fast tone recovers
Leaders named
soon
players teammates point to
Newcomers
soon
transfers talked about as part of it
Openness
soon
forthcoming vs guarded
Measured from press conferences and interviews, program by program.
Climate facts
Athletic director
Jeremy McClain
year 8
Football spending
$11.0M
2024-25 federal report
Spending trend
+38%
over three years
Department revenue
$32M
all sports
Recruiting spend
$0.55M
men's teams
Home crowds
—
of capacity
Staff turnover
63%
on-field staff new this season
Fan mood
soon
fans and local media
Coach & AD
soon
on the same page
Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Offense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Lyddy
Robinson
Dalton
Johnson
Little
Kilgore
Maui
Nunnery
Cain
Rounds
Devine
QBLandry Lyddy32212233222
RBSteven Robinson24214343444
WRDavis Dalton2212122212222
WRMJ Johnson11111111111
WRAJ Little24214343444
TEPreston Kilgore23213444444
OLAloali'i Maui3421441615555
OLGreg Nunnery33121341529444
OLBraden Cain24214454555
OLJoe Rounds24214454555
OLDante Devine24214454555

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Defense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Cairo
Lewis
Stegall
Cyprien
Haygood
Edison
Brown
Albert
Robinson
Murphy
Sylvie
DLNasim Cairo53255554425
DLJameer Lewis37234332323
DLJR Stegall22222221222
DLKameron Cyprien53255554425
LBMathis Haygood54256554425
LBWesley Edison53255554425
DBJyaire Brown53255554425
DBKobi Albert42144444314
DBMichael Robinson III43244443424
DBMalakai Murphy22222221222
DBLandon Sylvie53255554425

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Chemistry is Scorebook's own rating of how well a program fits together, on the same all-time 0-99 scale as our other ratings (compared with every FBS team since 2016; 62 is typical, 20-50 signals something is wrong, and single digits are reserved for true collapses; each season is compared with its own era). This early version blends continuity (who has played and coached together, and for how long; it counts most) with the climate around the program; how the program talks joins as it is measured. Within continuity, quarterback-centered pairings count most because they held up when we tested them against results. How our ratings work →