Scorebook
Join
Teams / Mountain West / San José State
Index · this season
53
▼ Below its 5-year level -4▲ Up 3 this season
Career56since 1936
Peak761990
Last 557seasons
#113 nationally · 3-3 (1-1 conf)
Résumé #107
Schedule so far #107
Margin ±5 pts (tightens with games)
Why 53? →

San José State Spartans

Mountain West · San Jose, CA · CEFCU Stadium · Head coach Ken Niumatalolo
Rival
Established rivalry
31-40 all time (71 meetings since 1950)
Fresno State leads
Last: lost 26-10 (2026) · Fresno State has won 3 straight
Wants it back
program traits are earned from history
No recognized national titles since 1936. Counted: AP poll champion, a coaches-poll champion, or the BCS / playoff title-game winner; a split year counts for both.0national titles
Heisman Trophy winners0Heisman
Seasons finishing in the AP top 10 since 19360AP top-10
Consensus All-Americans since 19361All-Americans
NFL draft picks since 196743NFL picks
Winning percentage since 193645.3%win pct
History since 1936 · football since 1950. Every season →
Chemistry
Chem 73: strong73
Chem 75: strong
75Foundation
Chem 70: strong
70Gel
gel counts 45% so far
▲ Above its norm +24
early · #7 of 138
HC year3
Ret. starters14%
QB yrs w/ OC1
View chemistry →
Team chemistryearly · #7 of 138 FBS teams
Chem 75: strongFoundation75+Chem 70: strongGel70=Chem 73: strongChem73Gel counts 45% so far (it grows as games are played, up to half)
Foundationwhat the program has built · moves over seasons
Foundation75Staff stability — Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnoverStaff stability80Roster continuity — Returning starters and the lineup's experienceRoster continuity99Unit cohesion — QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played togetherUnit cohesion99Administration — Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignmentAdministration69Investment — Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruitingInvestment50Fan base — How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matterFan base32
ContinuityClimate
Continuity · who has played and coached togetherlive

Who has played and coached together, and for how long, ranked against every FBS team at the same point of the season.

▸Staff stability
Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnover
80
Staff cohesion99
HC year 3 · OC year 3 · DC year 1
Assistant turnover61
43% of on-field staff new this season (FBS average about 45%)
▸Roster continuity
Returning starters and the lineup's experience
99
Returning core99
14% of last season's starters · FBS median 14%
Experience99
8 career starts per starter · FBS median 8
▸Unit cohesion
QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played together
99
QB & coordinator99
1st season together · same as 100% of FBS teams
QB & receivers99
4.0 games started together on average · FBS median 4.0
Line cohesion99
4.8 games per linemen pair · FBS median 4.8
Defensive cohesion99
4.2 games per defensive pair · FBS median 4.2
Climate · around the programlive

The administration, money and fans around the team: athletic director continuity, willingness to invest, and crowds.

▸Administration
Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignment
69
AD continuity69
Jeff Konya · year 6 (Wikipedia, CC BY-SA)
▸Investment
Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruiting
50
Football's share55
28% of department spending goes to football
Investment trend62
+28% over three years
Football investment42
$11.9M on football (2024-25 federal report)
Recruiting spend19
$0.36M men's recruiting
Department resources45
$43M athletic department revenue
▸Fan base
How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matter
32
Sellouts30
sellout crowds (95%+ of capacity) at 0 of 40 home games (last 8 seasons)
Sells out anyway34
sellout crowds at 0 of 36 games that didn't matter: cupcakes, or a team expected to lose or having a losing season

Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures, as reported by each school. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA). Attendance: reported crowds vs stadium capacity.

Gelhow it is working right now · moves week to week
Gel70Playing above its parts — Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by gamePlaying above its parts82Settled & sharp — A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normalSettled & sharp71Alignment — Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one pageAlignmentsoonResilience — Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversityResiliencesoonFan & media mood — Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins laterFan & media mood73Coach security — The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new ADCoach security59
InternalOn-field fitExternal
Internal · how the program talkscoming

How the team talks in press conferences and interviews, each program against its own normal, so a naturally terse coach isn't read as upset. Being built program by program, Big Ten first.

▸Alignment
Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one page
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.
▸Resilience
Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversity
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.

Readings are team-level; we don't publish psychological readings of individual players.

On-field fit · how it is playing togetherlive

How the team is playing together this season: beating or missing its preseason expectation, a settled lineup, clean execution.

▸Playing above its parts
Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by game
82
This season82
+6.8 points a game vs its preseason projection (5 games)
▸Settled & sharp
A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normal
71
This season71
82% of starters kept game to game
External · pressure from outsidelive

Pressure from outside the building: the hard-facts hot seat now; this season's fan and media mood as it is measured.

▸Fan & media mood
Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins later
73
This season73
outside the AP poll: projected #128 preseason -> #113 in our Index now · lost to rival Fresno State 26-10 (-7) · beat rival Hawai'i 20-16 (+8) · results 3-3 (-1, recent games count more)
▸Coach security
The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new AD
59
This season59
Ken Niumatalolo, year 3 · 50% wins so far · +6.8 pts a game vs preseason expectation · last two seasons +1% vs the program's norm

Dashed gold ring = typical (62). 20-50 is the warning zone; under 10 is a collapse. Spokes with no data yet are dashed and left out until they fill in. Chem blends the two halves, then places the blend among this season's teams.

Trend · Foundationeach program year runs Feb 1 to the title game
'1650'1728'1841'1955'2054'2154'2257'2359'2430'2562'262016 wk 1 vs Tulsa: 53 · L2016 wk 2 vs Portland State: 70 · W2016 wk 3 vs Utah: 46 · L2016 wk 4 vs Iowa State: 50 · L2016 wk 5 vs New Mexico: 51 · L2016 wk 6 vs Hawai'i: 48 · L2016 wk 7 vs Nevada: 52 · W2016 wk 8 vs San Diego State: 54 · L2016 wk 9 vs UNLV: 53 · W2016 wk 10 vs Boise State: 50 · L2016 wk 12 vs Air Force: 51 · L2016 wk 13 vs Fresno State: 50 · W2017 wk 1 vs Cal Poly: 25 · W2017 wk 2 vs Texas: 24 · L2017 wk 3 vs Utah: 24 · L2017 wk 4 vs Utah State: 25 · L2017 wk 5 vs UNLV: 25 · L2017 wk 6 vs Fresno State: 23 · L2017 wk 7 vs Hawai'i: 32 · L2017 wk 9 vs BYU: 32 · L2017 wk 10 vs San Diego State: 31 · L2017 wk 11 vs Nevada: 31 · L2017 wk 12 vs Colorado State: 28 · L2017 wk 13 vs Wyoming: 28 · W2018 wk 3 vs Oregon: 39 · L2018 wk 5 vs Hawai'i: 45 · L2018 wk 6 vs Colorado State: 46 · L2018 wk 7 vs Army: 44 · L2018 wk 8 vs San Diego State: 44 · L2018 wk 9 vs UNLV: 43 · W2018 wk 10 vs Wyoming: 45 · L2018 wk 11 vs Utah State: 45 · L2018 wk 12 vs Nevada: 42 · L2018 wk 13 vs Fresno State: 41 · L2019 wk 4 vs Arkansas: 54 · W2019 wk 5 vs Air Force: 52 · L2019 wk 6 vs New Mexico: 52 · W2019 wk 7 vs Nevada: 51 · L2019 wk 8 vs San Diego State: 52 · L2019 wk 9 vs Army: 52 · W2019 wk 10 vs Boise State: 52 · L2019 wk 11 vs Hawai'i: 53 · L2019 wk 13 vs UNLV: 54 · L2019 wk 14 vs Fresno State: 55 · W2020 wk 9 vs New Mexico: 51 · W2020 wk 10 vs San Diego State: 48 · W2020 wk 11 vs UNLV: 51 · W2020 wk 14 vs Hawai'i: 52 · W2020 wk 15 vs Nevada: 52 · W2020 wk 16 vs Boise State: 54 · W2020 wk 1 vs Ball State: 54 · L2021 wk 3 vs Hawai'i: 55 · W2021 wk 4 vs Western Michigan: 55 · L2021 wk 5 vs New Mexico State: 54 · W2021 wk 6 vs Colorado State: 49 · L2021 wk 7 vs San Diego State: 50 · L2021 wk 8 vs UNLV: 54 · W2021 wk 9 vs Wyoming: 53 · W2021 wk 10 vs Nevada: 53 · L2021 wk 11 vs Utah State: 54 · L2021 wk 13 vs Fresno State: 54 · L2022 wk 2 vs Auburn: 56 · L2022 wk 4 vs Western Michigan: 58 · W2022 wk 5 vs Wyoming: 58 · W2022 wk 6 vs UNLV: 56 · W2022 wk 7 vs Fresno State: 57 · L2022 wk 9 vs Nevada: 57 · W2022 wk 10 vs Colorado State: 56 · W2022 wk 11 vs San Diego State: 57 · L2022 wk 12 vs Utah State: 59 · L2022 wk 13 vs Hawai'i: 57 · W2022 wk 1 vs Eastern Michigan: 57 · L2023 wk 1 vs Oregon State: 57 · L2023 wk 2 vs Cal Poly: 57 · W2023 wk 3 vs Toledo: 58 · L2023 wk 4 vs Air Force: 59 · L2023 wk 6 vs Boise State: 59 · L2023 wk 7 vs New Mexico: 59 · W2023 wk 8 vs Utah State: 58 · W2023 wk 9 vs Hawai'i: 59 · W2023 wk 11 vs Fresno State: 60 · W2023 wk 12 vs San Diego State: 60 · W2023 wk 13 vs UNLV: 60 · W2023 wk 1 vs Coastal Carolina: 59 · L2024 wk 2 vs Air Force: 19 · W2024 wk 3 vs Kennesaw State: 19 · W2024 wk 4 vs Washington State: 31 · L2024 wk 6 vs Nevada: 31 · W2024 wk 7 vs Colorado State: 33 · L2024 wk 8 vs Wyoming: 29 · W2024 wk 9 vs Fresno State: 19 · L2024 wk 11 vs Oregon State: 22 · W2024 wk 12 vs Boise State: 30 · L2024 wk 13 vs UNLV: 31 · L2024 wk 14 vs Stanford: 33 · W2024 wk 1 vs South Florida: 30 · L2025 wk 2 vs Texas: 59 · L2025 wk 4 vs Idaho: 60 · W2025 wk 5 vs Stanford: 59 · L2025 wk 6 vs New Mexico: 60 · W2025 wk 7 vs Wyoming: 60 · L2025 wk 8 vs Utah State: 61 · L2025 wk 10 vs Hawai'i: 62 · W2025 wk 11 vs Air Force: 62 · L2025 wk 12 vs Nevada: 63 · L2025 wk 13 vs San Diego State: 62 · L2025 wk 14 vs Fresno State: 62 · L2026 wk 1 vs Eastern Michigan: 47 · W2026 wk 2 vs Cal Poly: 48 · W2026 wk 3 vs Fresno State: 47 · L2026 wk 5 vs Hawai'i: 48 · W2026 wk 6 vs Wyoming: 48 · L2026 wk 7 vs UTEP: 50 · next gametypical 62

Every game since 2016, one continuous line; thin rules separate seasons and the chip is where each season finished. Navy dot = win, red = loss. Big drops usually mean a new staff, a new quarterback or a rebuilt line.

Trend · Gelthis season, after each game
typical 62wk 1 vs Eastern Michigan · W · on-field 60 · fan mood 95731wk 2 vs Cal Poly · W · on-field 69 · fan mood 99802wk 3 vs Fresno State · L · on-field 70 · fan mood 65683wk 5 vs Hawai'i · W · on-field 73 · fan mood 92805wk 6 vs Wyoming · L · on-field 73 · fan mood 76746

How the team is working right now, rebuilt after each game from only the games so far: on-field fit (results vs preseason expectation, lineup settling, execution) and that week's fan & media mood. Coach security is part of today's Gel number but isn't rebuilt week by week yet. Navy frame = win, red = loss.

Continuity facts
Head coach
Year 3
at this school
Offensive coordinator
Year 3
at this school
Defensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
HC & OC together
3 seasons
working together
QB with his OC
1 seasons
same play-caller
QB & receivers
4.0 games
started together, average
Offensive line pairs
4.8 games
started together, average
Returning starters
14%
from last season
Starter experience
8 starts
career average
Internal facts
Pressers read
soon
this season, coaches and players
Coach tone
soon
vs his own normal
"We" vs "I"
soon
share of team language
Owning mistakes
soon
vs pointing outward
Same story
soon
coaches and players agree
After losses
soon
how fast tone recovers
Leaders named
soon
players teammates point to
Newcomers
soon
transfers talked about as part of it
Openness
soon
forthcoming vs guarded
Measured from press conferences and interviews, program by program.
Climate facts
Athletic director
Jeff Konya
year 6
Football spending
$11.9M
2024-25 federal report
Spending trend
+28%
over three years
Department revenue
$43M
all sports
Recruiting spend
$0.36M
men's teams
Home crowds
—
of capacity
Staff turnover
43%
on-field staff new this season
Fan mood
soon
fans and local media
Coach & AD
soon
on the same page
Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Offense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Weaver
Bates
Ivey
Hoch
Clark
Kopa-Kaawalauole
Serna
Harbert
Chen
Tuliau
Afalava
QBLuke Weaver66654166616
RBJabari Bates69654166716
WRAnthony Ivey66654166616
WRCooper Hoch55594159715
WRCarson Clark44444144414
TEKamaehu Kopa-Kaawalauole11111111111
OLManuel Serna66654166616
OLJoseph Harbert6669416201416
OLTyler Chen6767416141916
OLDaniel Tuliau11111111111
OLSimeon Afalava66654166616

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Defense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Stearns
McGlothen
Tuiileila
Langi
Powell
Lee
Danielson
Dukes
Womack
Robertson
Tagovailoa-Amosa
DLJustin Stearns122365586646
DLJayland McGlothen22122222222
DLJeremiah Tuiileila31332333333
DLSolomone Langi62365566646
LBEthan Powell522517455536
LBDylan Lee52354555545
LBNaseri Danielson82365586646
DBBrian Dukes Jr.62365566646
DBCaleb Womack62365566646
DBJayden Robertson42343444444
DBTuli Tagovailoa-Amosa62366566648

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Chemistry is Scorebook's own rating of how well a program fits together, on the same all-time 0-99 scale as our other ratings (compared with every FBS team since 2016; 62 is typical, 20-50 signals something is wrong, and single digits are reserved for true collapses; each season is compared with its own era). This early version blends continuity (who has played and coached together, and for how long; it counts most) with the climate around the program; how the program talks joins as it is measured. Within continuity, quarterback-centered pairings count most because they held up when we tested them against results. How our ratings work →