Scorebook
Join
Teams / Big 12 / Oklahoma State
Index · this season
71
at its 5-year level▲ Up 7 this season
Career68since 1936
Peak942011
Last 569seasons
#44 nationally · 4-1 (2-0 conf)
Résumé #27 · record ahead of its play
Schedule so far #57
Margin ±5 pts (tightens with games)
Why 71? →

Oklahoma State Cowboys

Big 12 · Stillwater, OK · Boone Pickens Stadium · Head coach Eric Morris
Rival
Heated rivalry
20-85-7 all time (112 meetings since 1912)
Oklahoma leads
Last: won 27-24 (2023)
Holds it
program traits are earned from history
No recognized national titles since 1936. Counted: AP poll champion, a coaches-poll champion, or the BCS / playoff title-game winner; a split year counts for both. The school claims 1.0national titles
Heisman Trophy winners1Heisman
Seasons finishing in the AP top 10 since 19364AP top-10
Consensus All-Americans since 193616All-Americans
NFL draft picks since 196785NFL picks
Winning percentage since 193651.6%win pct
History since 1936 · football since 1912. Every season →
Chemistry
Chem 66: new staff, still building66
Chem 55: typical
55Foundation
Chem 81: strong
81Gel
gel counts 40% so far
at its usual levelTrending up
early · #24 of 138
HC year1
Ret. starters18%
QB yrs w/ OC1
View chemistry →
Team chemistryearly · #24 of 138 FBS teams
Chem 55: typicalFoundation55+Chem 81: strongGel81=Chem 66: typicalChem66Gel counts 40% so far (it grows as games are played, up to half)
Foundationwhat the program has built · moves over seasons
Foundation55Staff stability — Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnoverStaff stability49Roster continuity — Returning starters and the lineup's experienceRoster continuity52Unit cohesion — QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played togetherUnit cohesion53Administration — Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignmentAdministration69Investment — Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruitingInvestment41Fan base — How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matterFan base76
ContinuityClimate
Continuity · who has played and coached togetherlive

Who has played and coached together, and for how long, ranked against every FBS team at the same point of the season.

▸Staff stability
Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnover
49
Staff cohesion49
HC year 1 · OC year 1 · DC year 1
▸Roster continuity
Returning starters and the lineup's experience
52
Returning core37
18% of last season's starters · FBS median 32%
Experience66
12 career starts per starter · FBS median 12
▸Unit cohesion
QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played together
53
QB & coordinator55
1st season together · same as 76% of FBS teams
QB & receivers70
4.5 games started together on average · FBS median 3.9
Line cohesion32
3.1 games per linemen pair · FBS median 5.2
Defensive cohesion45
3.6 games per defensive pair · FBS median 4.5
Climate · around the programlive

The administration, money and fans around the team: athletic director continuity, willingness to invest, and crowds.

▸Administration
Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignment
69
AD continuity69
Chad Weiberg · year 6 (Wikipedia, CC BY-SA)
▸Investment
Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruiting
41
Football's share14
21% of department spending goes to football
Investment trend46
+12% over three years
Football investment63
$32.8M on football (2024-25 federal report)
Recruiting spend68
$1.87M men's recruiting
Department resources70
$154M athletic department revenue
▸Fan base
How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matter
76
Sellouts77
sellout crowds (95%+ of capacity) at 31 of 46 home games (last 8 seasons)
Sells out anyway74
sellout crowds at 16 of 27 games that didn't matter: cupcakes, or a team expected to lose or having a losing season

Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures, as reported by each school. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA). Attendance: reported crowds vs stadium capacity.

Gelhow it is working right now · moves week to week
Gel81Playing above its parts — Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by gamePlaying above its parts83Settled & sharp — A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normalSettled & sharp64Alignment — Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one pageAlignmentsoonResilience — Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversityResiliencesoonFan & media mood — Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins laterFan & media mood99Coach security — The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new ADCoach security90
InternalOn-field fitExternal
Internal · how the program talkscoming

How the team talks in press conferences and interviews, each program against its own normal, so a naturally terse coach isn't read as upset. Being built program by program, Big Ten first.

▸Alignment
Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one page
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.
▸Resilience
Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversity
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.

Readings are team-level; we don't publish psychological readings of individual players.

On-field fit · how it is playing togetherlive

How the team is playing together this season: beating or missing its preseason expectation, a settled lineup, clean execution.

▸Playing above its parts
Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by game
83
This season83
+7.1 points a game vs its preseason projection (4 games)
▸Settled & sharp
A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normal
64
This season64
83% of starters kept game to game
External · pressure from outsidelive

Pressure from outside the building: the hard-facts hot seat now; this season's fan and media mood as it is measured.

▸Fan & media mood
Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins later
99
This season99
AP preseason unranked -> now #18 · results 4-1 (+14, recent games count more) · bowl team out of nowhere (4.2 wins preseason -> 7.2) (+10)
▸Coach security
The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new AD
90
This season90
Eric Morris, year 1 · 80% wins so far · +7.1 pts a game vs preseason expectation

Dashed gold ring = typical (62). 20-50 is the warning zone; under 10 is a collapse. Spokes with no data yet are dashed and left out until they fill in. Chem blends the two halves, then places the blend among this season's teams.

Trend · Foundationeach program year runs Feb 1 to the title game
'1677'1777'1867'1966'2074'2161'2254'2363'2473'2542'262016 wk 1 vs SE Louisiana: 76 · W2016 wk 2 vs Central Michigan: 85 · L2016 wk 3 vs Pittsburgh: 83 · W2016 wk 4 vs Baylor: 83 · L2016 wk 5 vs Texas: 83 · W2016 wk 6 vs Iowa State: 82 · W2016 wk 8 vs Kansas: 75 · W2016 wk 9 vs West Virginia: 80 · W2016 wk 10 vs Kansas State: 82 · W2016 wk 11 vs Texas Tech: 81 · W2016 wk 12 vs TCU: 77 · W2016 wk 14 vs Oklahoma: 81 · L2016 wk 1 vs Colorado: 77 · W2017 wk 2 vs South Alabama: 79 · W2017 wk 3 vs Pittsburgh: 78 · W2017 wk 4 vs TCU: 78 · L2017 wk 5 vs Texas Tech: 76 · W2017 wk 7 vs Baylor: 79 · W2017 wk 8 vs Texas: 77 · W2017 wk 9 vs West Virginia: 76 · W2017 wk 10 vs Oklahoma: 76 · L2017 wk 11 vs Iowa State: 77 · W2017 wk 12 vs Kansas State: 77 · L2017 wk 13 vs Kansas: 75 · W2017 wk 1 vs Virginia Tech: 77 · W2018 wk 2 vs South Alabama: 62 · W2018 wk 3 vs Boise State: 64 · W2018 wk 4 vs Texas Tech: 64 · L2018 wk 5 vs Kansas: 69 · W2018 wk 6 vs Iowa State: 68 · L2018 wk 7 vs Kansas State: 64 · L2018 wk 9 vs Texas: 70 · W2018 wk 10 vs Baylor: 70 · L2018 wk 11 vs Oklahoma: 69 · L2018 wk 12 vs West Virginia: 70 · W2018 wk 13 vs TCU: 66 · L2018 wk 1 vs Missouri: 67 · W2019 wk 2 vs McNeese: 67 · W2019 wk 3 vs Tulsa: 69 · W2019 wk 4 vs Texas: 69 · L2019 wk 5 vs Kansas State: 70 · W2019 wk 6 vs Texas Tech: 69 · L2019 wk 8 vs Baylor: 70 · L2019 wk 9 vs Iowa State: 70 · W2019 wk 10 vs TCU: 70 · W2019 wk 12 vs Kansas: 67 · W2019 wk 13 vs West Virginia: 70 · W2019 wk 14 vs Oklahoma: 67 · L2019 wk 1 vs Texas A&M: 66 · L2020 wk 4 vs West Virginia: 76 · W2020 wk 5 vs Kansas: 72 · W2020 wk 8 vs Iowa State: 77 · W2020 wk 9 vs Texas: 78 · L2020 wk 10 vs Kansas State: 76 · W2020 wk 12 vs Oklahoma: 76 · L2020 wk 13 vs Texas Tech: 78 · W2020 wk 14 vs TCU: 76 · L2020 wk 15 vs Baylor: 77 · W2020 wk 1 vs Miami: 74 · W2021 wk 2 vs Tulsa: 64 · W2021 wk 3 vs Boise State: 62 · W2021 wk 4 vs Kansas State: 64 · W2021 wk 5 vs Baylor: 65 · W2021 wk 7 vs Texas: 66 · W2021 wk 8 vs Iowa State: 67 · L2021 wk 9 vs Kansas: 67 · W2021 wk 10 vs West Virginia: 66 · W2021 wk 11 vs TCU: 67 · W2021 wk 12 vs Texas Tech: 66 · W2021 wk 13 vs Oklahoma: 60 · W2021 wk 14 vs Baylor: 64 · L2021 wk 1 vs Notre Dame: 61 · W2022 wk 2 vs Arizona State: 70 · W2022 wk 3 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 71 · W2022 wk 5 vs Baylor: 70 · W2022 wk 6 vs Texas Tech: 71 · W2022 wk 7 vs TCU: 71 · L2022 wk 8 vs Texas: 71 · W2022 wk 9 vs Kansas State: 67 · L2022 wk 10 vs Kansas: 67 · L2022 wk 11 vs Iowa State: 57 · W2022 wk 12 vs Oklahoma: 53 · L2022 wk 13 vs West Virginia: 67 · L2022 wk 1 vs Wisconsin: 54 · L2023 wk 2 vs Arizona State: 64 · W2023 wk 3 vs South Alabama: 61 · L2023 wk 4 vs Iowa State: 63 · L2023 wk 6 vs Kansas State: 64 · W2023 wk 7 vs Kansas: 64 · W2023 wk 8 vs West Virginia: 64 · W2023 wk 9 vs Cincinnati: 66 · W2023 wk 10 vs Oklahoma: 64 · W2023 wk 11 vs UCF: 65 · L2023 wk 12 vs Houston: 65 · W2023 wk 13 vs BYU: 66 · W2023 wk 14 vs Texas: 64 · L2023 wk 1 vs Texas A&M: 63 · W2024 wk 2 vs Arkansas: 79 · W2024 wk 3 vs Tulsa: 79 · W2024 wk 4 vs Utah: 79 · L2024 wk 5 vs Kansas State: 79 · L2024 wk 6 vs West Virginia: 78 · L2024 wk 8 vs BYU: 78 · L2024 wk 9 vs Baylor: 77 · L2024 wk 10 vs Arizona State: 78 · L2024 wk 11 vs TCU: 79 · L2024 wk 13 vs Texas Tech: 79 · L2024 wk 14 vs Colorado: 73 · L2025 wk 2 vs Oregon: 34 · L2025 wk 4 vs Tulsa: 31 · L2025 wk 5 vs Baylor: 34 · L2025 wk 6 vs Arizona: 43 · L2025 wk 7 vs Houston: 41 · L2025 wk 8 vs Cincinnati: 38 · L2025 wk 9 vs Texas Tech: 38 · L2025 wk 10 vs Kansas: 38 · L2025 wk 12 vs Kansas State: 41 · L2025 wk 13 vs UCF: 40 · L2025 wk 14 vs Iowa State: 42 · L2026 wk 2 vs Oregon: 54 · W2026 wk 3 vs Murray State: 55 · W2026 wk 4 vs West Virginia: 54 · W2026 wk 6 vs UCF: 57 · W2026 wk 7 vs Houston: 56 · next gametypical 62

Every game since 2016, one continuous line; thin rules separate seasons and the chip is where each season finished. Navy dot = win, red = loss. Big drops usually mean a new staff, a new quarterback or a rebuilt line.

Trend · Gelthis season, after each game
typical 62wk 1 · on-field 21 · fan mood 37271wk 2 vs Oregon · W · on-field 47 · fan mood 65542wk 3 vs Murray State · W · on-field 55 · fan mood 72613wk 4 vs West Virginia · W · on-field 61 · fan mood 99754wk 6 vs UCF · W · on-field 67 · fan mood 99796

How the team is working right now, rebuilt after each game from only the games so far: on-field fit (results vs preseason expectation, lineup settling, execution) and that week's fan & media mood. Coach security is part of today's Gel number but isn't rebuilt week by week yet. Navy frame = win, red = loss.

Continuity facts
Head coach
Year 1
new this season
Offensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
Defensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
HC & OC together
1 seasons
working together
QB with his OC
1 seasons
same play-caller
QB & receivers
4.5 games
started together, average
Offensive line pairs
3.1 games
started together, average
Returning starters
18%
from last season
Starter experience
12 starts
career average
Internal facts
Pressers read
soon
this season, coaches and players
Coach tone
soon
vs his own normal
"We" vs "I"
soon
share of team language
Owning mistakes
soon
vs pointing outward
Same story
soon
coaches and players agree
After losses
soon
how fast tone recovers
Leaders named
soon
players teammates point to
Newcomers
soon
transfers talked about as part of it
Openness
soon
forthcoming vs guarded
Measured from press conferences and interviews, program by program.
Climate facts
Athletic director
Chad Weiberg
year 6
Football spending
$32.8M
2024-25 federal report
Spending trend
+12%
over three years
Department revenue
$154M
all sports
Recruiting spend
$1.87M
men's teams
Home crowds
—
of capacity
Staff turnover
—
on-field staff new this season
Fan mood
soon
fans and local media
Coach & AD
soon
on the same page
Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Offense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Mestemaker
Hawkins
Bowick
Coleman
Lewis
Kolb
Lepo
Magiya
Hanson
Mercer
Torgeson
QBDrew Mestemaker55553552454
RBCaleb Hawkins55553552454
WRJustin Bowick55553552454
WRMiles Coleman55553552454
WRTerrence Lewis33333332233
TECarson Kolb55553552454
OLAshton Lepo55553552454
OLDesmond Magiya22222222122
OLJoseph Hanson44442441443
OLTyler Mercer55553552454
OLShaun Torgeson44443442344

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Defense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Johnson
Rigsby
Lawson
Williams
Wesloski
Romney
Lewis
Phillips
Fields
Bodnar
Hammonds
DLJaleel Johnson72444413444
DLBraylon Rigsby22222211222
DLJerry Lawson42555524555
DLJames Williams42555524555
LBEthan Wesloski42555524555
LBTate Romney42555524555
DBKollin Lewis11222222222
DBMose Phillips III31444424444
DBLaDainian Fields425555241155
DBChristian Bodnar42555524555
DBQuinton Hammonds42555524555

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Chemistry is Scorebook's own rating of how well a program fits together, on the same all-time 0-99 scale as our other ratings (compared with every FBS team since 2016; 62 is typical, 20-50 signals something is wrong, and single digits are reserved for true collapses; each season is compared with its own era). This early version blends continuity (who has played and coached together, and for how long; it counts most) with the climate around the program; how the program talks joins as it is measured. Within continuity, quarterback-centered pairings count most because they held up when we tested them against results. How our ratings work →