Scorebook
Join
Teams / Mid-American / Ohio
Index · this season
58
at its 5-year level
Career52since 1936
Peak722018
Last 559seasons
#92 nationally · 4-2 (2-0 conf)
Résumé #80 · record ahead of its play
Schedule so far #121
Margin ±5 pts (tightens with games)
Why 58? →

Ohio Bobcats

Mid-American · Athens, OH · Peden Stadium · Head coach John Hauser
Rival
Established rivalry
30-33-1 all time (64 meetings since 1962)
Miami (OH) leads
Last: won 24-20 (2025) · Ohio has won 2 straight
Holds it
program traits are earned from history
No recognized national titles since 1936. Counted: AP poll champion, a coaches-poll champion, or the BCS / playoff title-game winner; a split year counts for both.0national titles
Heisman Trophy winners0Heisman
Seasons finishing in the AP top 10 since 19360AP top-10
Consensus All-Americans since 19360All-Americans
NFL draft picks since 196712NFL picks
Winning percentage since 193645.7%win pct
History since 1936 · football since 1945. Every season →
Chemistry
Chem 61: new staff, still building61
Chem 51: typical
51Foundation
Chem 73: strong
73Gel
gel counts 45% so far
at its usual levelTrending up
early · #56 of 138
HC year1
Ret. starters23%
QB yrs w/ OC1
View chemistry →
Team chemistryearly · #56 of 138 FBS teams
Chem 51: typicalFoundation51+Chem 73: strongGel73=Chem 61: typicalChem61Gel counts 45% so far (it grows as games are played, up to half)
Foundationwhat the program has built · moves over seasons
Foundation51Staff stability — Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnoverStaff stability58Roster continuity — Returning starters and the lineup's experienceRoster continuity38Unit cohesion — QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played togetherUnit cohesion52Administration — Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignmentAdministration49Investment — Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruitingInvestment51Fan base — How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matterFan base60
ContinuityClimate
Continuity · who has played and coached togetherlive

Who has played and coached together, and for how long, ranked against every FBS team at the same point of the season.

▸Staff stability
Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnover
58
Staff cohesion58
HC year 1 · OC year 5 · DC year 1
Assistant turnover58
46% of on-field staff new this season (FBS average about 45%)
▸Roster continuity
Returning starters and the lineup's experience
38
Returning core47
23% of last season's starters · FBS median 32%
Experience29
7 career starts per starter · FBS median 12
▸Unit cohesion
QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played together
52
QB & coordinator55
1st season together · same as 76% of FBS teams
QB & receivers37
2.0 games started together on average · FBS median 3.9
Line cohesion60
4.9 games per linemen pair · FBS median 5.2
Defensive cohesion63
4.5 games per defensive pair · FBS median 4.5
Climate · around the programlive

The administration, money and fans around the team: athletic director continuity, willingness to invest, and crowds.

▸Administration
Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignment
49
AD continuity49
Slade Larscheid · year 2 (Wikipedia, CC BY-SA)
▸Investment
Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruiting
51
Football's share70
33% of department spending goes to football
Investment trend51
+17% over three years
Football investment26
$10.8M on football (2024-25 federal report)
Recruiting spend33
$0.48M men's recruiting
Department resources23
$33M athletic department revenue
▸Fan base
How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matter
60
Sellouts61
sellout crowds (95%+ of capacity) at 5 of 40 home games (last 8 seasons)
Sells out anyway60
sellout crowds at 3 of 30 games that didn't matter: cupcakes, or a team expected to lose or having a losing season

Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures, as reported by each school. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA). Attendance: reported crowds vs stadium capacity.

Gelhow it is working right now · moves week to week
Gel73Playing above its parts — Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by gamePlaying above its parts60Settled & sharp — A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normalSettled & sharp65Alignment — Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one pageAlignmentsoonResilience — Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversityResiliencesoonFan & media mood — Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins laterFan & media mood86Coach security — The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new ADCoach security79
InternalOn-field fitExternal
Internal · how the program talkscoming

How the team talks in press conferences and interviews, each program against its own normal, so a naturally terse coach isn't read as upset. Being built program by program, Big Ten first.

▸Alignment
Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one page
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.
▸Resilience
Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversity
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.

Readings are team-level; we don't publish psychological readings of individual players.

On-field fit · how it is playing togetherlive

How the team is playing together this season: beating or missing its preseason expectation, a settled lineup, clean execution.

▸Playing above its parts
Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by game
60
This season60
-0.3 points a game vs its preseason projection (5 games)
▸Settled & sharp
A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normal
65
This season65
82% of starters kept game to game
External · pressure from outsidelive

Pressure from outside the building: the hard-facts hot seat now; this season's fan and media mood as it is measured.

▸Fan & media mood
Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins later
86
This season86
outside the AP poll: projected #104 preseason -> #92 in our Index now · beat rival Kent State 13-10 (+8) · results 4-2 (+9, recent games count more)
▸Coach security
The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new AD
79
This season79
John Hauser, year 2 · 67% wins so far · -0.3 pts a game vs preseason expectation · last two seasons +40% vs the program's norm

Dashed gold ring = typical (62). 20-50 is the warning zone; under 10 is a collapse. Spokes with no data yet are dashed and left out until they fill in. Chem blends the two halves, then places the blend among this season's teams.

Trend · Foundationeach program year runs Feb 1 to the title game
'1674'1769'1874'1958'2060'2150'2249'2372'2448'2557'262016 wk 1 vs Texas State: 82 · L2016 wk 2 vs Kansas: 89 · W2016 wk 3 vs Tennessee: 83 · L2016 wk 4 vs Gardner-Webb: 87 · W2016 wk 5 vs Miami (OH): 82 · W2016 wk 6 vs Bowling Green: 77 · W2016 wk 7 vs Eastern Michigan: 79 · L2016 wk 8 vs Kent State: 80 · W2016 wk 9 vs Toledo: 76 · W2016 wk 10 vs Buffalo: 76 · W2016 wk 12 vs Central Michigan: 77 · L2016 wk 13 vs Akron: 75 · W2016 wk 14 vs Western Michigan: 75 · L2016 wk 1 vs Troy: 74 · L2017 wk 2 vs Purdue: 72 · L2017 wk 3 vs Kansas: 73 · W2017 wk 4 vs Eastern Michigan: 65 · W2017 wk 5 vs Massachusetts: 67 · W2017 wk 6 vs Central Michigan: 67 · L2017 wk 7 vs Bowling Green: 68 · W2017 wk 8 vs Kent State: 66 · W2017 wk 10 vs Miami (OH): 68 · W2017 wk 11 vs Toledo: 68 · W2017 wk 12 vs Akron: 68 · L2017 wk 13 vs Buffalo: 70 · L2017 wk 1 vs UAB: 69 · W2018 wk 3 vs Virginia: 69 · L2018 wk 4 vs Cincinnati: 71 · L2018 wk 5 vs Massachusetts: 71 · W2018 wk 6 vs Kent State: 73 · W2018 wk 7 vs Northern Illinois: 74 · L2018 wk 8 vs Bowling Green: 72 · W2018 wk 9 vs Ball State: 71 · W2018 wk 10 vs Western Michigan: 72 · W2018 wk 11 vs Miami (OH): 74 · L2018 wk 12 vs Buffalo: 75 · W2018 wk 13 vs Akron: 75 · W2018 wk 1 vs San Diego State: 74 · W2019 wk 2 vs Pittsburgh: 60 · L2019 wk 3 vs Marshall: 62 · L2019 wk 4 vs Louisiana: 57 · L2019 wk 6 vs Buffalo: 61 · W2019 wk 7 vs Northern Illinois: 61 · L2019 wk 8 vs Kent State: 60 · W2019 wk 9 vs Ball State: 58 · W2019 wk 11 vs Miami (OH): 59 · L2019 wk 12 vs Western Michigan: 61 · L2019 wk 13 vs Bowling Green: 61 · W2019 wk 14 vs Akron: 61 · W2019 wk 1 vs Nevada: 58 · W2020 wk 11 vs Akron: 60 · W2020 wk 13 vs Bowling Green: 60 · W2021 wk 2 vs Duquesne: 43 · L2021 wk 3 vs Louisiana: 43 · L2021 wk 4 vs Northwestern: 47 · L2021 wk 5 vs Akron: 47 · W2021 wk 6 vs Central Michigan: 47 · L2021 wk 7 vs Buffalo: 43 · L2021 wk 8 vs Kent State: 47 · L2021 wk 10 vs Miami (OH): 49 · W2021 wk 11 vs Eastern Michigan: 47 · W2021 wk 12 vs Toledo: 48 · L2021 wk 13 vs Bowling Green: 50 · L2022 wk 2 vs Penn State: 56 · L2022 wk 3 vs Iowa State: 58 · L2022 wk 4 vs Fordham: 57 · W2022 wk 5 vs Kent State: 56 · L2022 wk 6 vs Akron: 52 · W2022 wk 7 vs Western Michigan: 54 · W2022 wk 8 vs Northern Illinois: 55 · W2022 wk 10 vs Buffalo: 55 · W2022 wk 11 vs Miami (OH): 57 · W2022 wk 12 vs Ball State: 59 · W2022 wk 13 vs Bowling Green: 59 · W2022 wk 14 vs Toledo: 50 · L2022 wk 1 vs Wyoming: 49 · W2023 wk 1 vs Long Island University: 75 · W2023 wk 2 vs Florida Atlantic: 71 · W2023 wk 3 vs Iowa State: 75 · W2023 wk 4 vs Bowling Green: 75 · W2023 wk 6 vs Kent State: 75 · W2023 wk 7 vs Northern Illinois: 76 · L2023 wk 8 vs Western Michigan: 76 · W2023 wk 9 vs Miami (OH): 76 · L2023 wk 11 vs Buffalo: 77 · W2023 wk 12 vs Central Michigan: 74 · W2023 wk 13 vs Akron: 76 · W2023 wk 1 vs Georgia Southern: 72 · W2024 wk 2 vs South Alabama: 48 · W2024 wk 3 vs Morgan State: 51 · W2024 wk 4 vs Kentucky: 52 · L2024 wk 5 vs Akron: 45 · W2024 wk 7 vs Central Michigan: 54 · W2024 wk 8 vs Miami (OH): 51 · L2024 wk 9 vs Buffalo: 53 · W2024 wk 11 vs Kent State: 54 · W2024 wk 12 vs Eastern Michigan: 55 · W2024 wk 13 vs Toledo: 54 · W2024 wk 14 vs Ball State: 55 · W2024 wk 15 vs Miami (OH): 54 · W2024 wk 1 vs Jacksonville State: 48 · W2025 wk 2 vs West Virginia: 57 · W2025 wk 3 vs Ohio State: 58 · L2025 wk 4 vs Gardner-Webb: 58 · W2025 wk 5 vs Bowling Green: 58 · W2025 wk 6 vs Ball State: 58 · L2025 wk 8 vs Northern Illinois: 58 · W2025 wk 9 vs Eastern Michigan: 59 · W2025 wk 11 vs Miami (OH): 59 · W2025 wk 12 vs Western Michigan: 59 · L2025 wk 13 vs Massachusetts: 59 · W2025 wk 14 vs Buffalo: 58 · W2025 wk 1 vs UNLV: 57 · W2026 wk 2 vs Jacksonville State: 47 · W2026 wk 3 vs South Alabama: 52 · L2026 wk 4 vs Stonehill: 46 · W2026 wk 5 vs Kent State: 52 · W2026 wk 6 vs Central Michigan: 52 · W2026 wk 7 vs Sacramento State: 51 · next gametypical 62

Every game since 2016, one continuous line; thin rules separate seasons and the chip is where each season finished. Navy dot = win, red = loss. Big drops usually mean a new staff, a new quarterback or a rebuilt line.

Trend · Gelthis season, after each game
typical 62wk 1 · on-field 77 · fan mood 56691wk 2 vs Jacksonville State · W · on-field 74 · fan mood 57682wk 3 vs South Alabama · L · on-field 61 · fan mood 50573wk 4 vs Stonehill · W · on-field 67 · fan mood 58644wk 5 vs Kent State · W · on-field 67 · fan mood 72695wk 6 vs Central Michigan · W · on-field 64 · fan mood 74686

How the team is working right now, rebuilt after each game from only the games so far: on-field fit (results vs preseason expectation, lineup settling, execution) and that week's fan & media mood. Coach security is part of today's Gel number but isn't rebuilt week by week yet. Navy frame = win, red = loss.

Continuity facts
Head coach
Year 1
new this season
Offensive coordinator
Year 5
at this school
Defensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
HC & OC together
1 seasons
working together
QB with his OC
1 seasons
same play-caller
QB & receivers
2.0 games
started together, average
Offensive line pairs
4.9 games
started together, average
Returning starters
23%
from last season
Starter experience
7 starts
career average
Internal facts
Pressers read
soon
this season, coaches and players
Coach tone
soon
vs his own normal
"We" vs "I"
soon
share of team language
Owning mistakes
soon
vs pointing outward
Same story
soon
coaches and players agree
After losses
soon
how fast tone recovers
Leaders named
soon
players teammates point to
Newcomers
soon
transfers talked about as part of it
Openness
soon
forthcoming vs guarded
Measured from press conferences and interviews, program by program.
Climate facts
Athletic director
Slade Larscheid
year 2
Football spending
$10.8M
2024-25 federal report
Spending trend
+17%
over three years
Department revenue
$33M
all sports
Recruiting spend
$0.48M
men's teams
Home crowds
—
of capacity
Staff turnover
46%
on-field staff new this season
Fan mood
soon
fans and local media
Coach & AD
soon
on the same page
Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Offense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Poulos
Brune
Dorwart
Bowman
Neer
Metzger
Shelby
Cisse
Parson
Anstead
Lawson
QBNick Poulos43313131332
RBDuncan Brune34414142443
WRDom Dorwart341316264665
WRPreston Bowman11111111111
WRRiley Neer34616264665
TEAndrew Metzger11212222222
OLJarian Shelby34616264665
OLTigana Cisse12414244444
OLBryce Parson34616264665
OLSeth Anstead34616264665
OLTrumain Lawson23515254555

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Defense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Gillison
Dukes
Neubert
Ackerman
Molnar
Minnis
Bannister
Walker
James-Hamilton
Dillon
Haskins
DLTyler Gillison66654166661
DLNehemiah Dukes619651211019661
DLTy Neubert66654166661
DLIke Ackerman55553155551
LBMichael Molnar41243131513441
LBJermaine Minnis11111111111
DBKendall Bannister61065511010661
DBDJ Walker619651311033661
DBDarren James-Hamilton66654166661
DBBarry Dillon66654166661
DBJT Haskins11111111111

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Chemistry is Scorebook's own rating of how well a program fits together, on the same all-time 0-99 scale as our other ratings (compared with every FBS team since 2016; 62 is typical, 20-50 signals something is wrong, and single digits are reserved for true collapses; each season is compared with its own era). This early version blends continuity (who has played and coached together, and for how long; it counts most) with the climate around the program; how the program talks joins as it is measured. Within continuity, quarterback-centered pairings count most because they held up when we tested them against results. How our ratings work →