Scorebook
Join
Teams / American Athletic / North Texas
Index · this season
67
▲ Above its 5-year level +7▲ Up 5 this season
Career53since 1936
Peak762025
Last 560seasons
#62 nationally · 4-2 (2-0 conf)
Résumé #57
Schedule so far #97
Margin ±5 pts (tightens with games)
Why 67? →

North Texas Mean Green

American Athletic · Denton, TX · DATCU Stadium · Head coach Neal Brown
Rival
UTSA · also SMU
Building rivalry
6-8 all time (14 meetings since 2013)
UTSA leads
Last: won 55-17 (2025)
Holds it
program traits are earned from history
No recognized national titles since 1936. Counted: AP poll champion, a coaches-poll champion, or the BCS / playoff title-game winner; a split year counts for both.0national titles
Heisman Trophy winners0Heisman
Seasons finishing in the AP top 10 since 19360AP top-10
Consensus All-Americans since 19361All-Americans
NFL draft picks since 196715NFL picks
Winning percentage since 193645.0%win pct
History since 1936 · football since 1922. Every season →
Chemistry
Chem 50: new staff, still building50
Chem 34: warning zone
34Foundation
Chem 69: typical
69Gel
gel counts 45% so far
at its usual levelTrending up
early · #104 of 138
HC year1
Ret. starters0%
QB yrs w/ OC—
View chemistry →
Team chemistryearly · #104 of 138 FBS teams
Chem 34: warning zoneFoundation34+Chem 69: typicalGel69=Chem 50: typicalChem50Gel counts 45% so far (it grows as games are played, up to half)
Foundationwhat the program has built · moves over seasons
Foundation34Staff stability — Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnoverStaff stability14Roster continuity — Returning starters and the lineup's experienceRoster continuity32Unit cohesion — QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played togetherUnit cohesion65Administration — Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignmentAdministration61Investment — Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruitingInvestment56Fan base — How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matterFan base56
ContinuityClimate
Continuity · who has played and coached togetherlive

Who has played and coached together, and for how long, ranked against every FBS team at the same point of the season.

▸Staff stability
Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnover
14
Staff cohesion—
Assistant turnover14
100% of on-field staff new this season (FBS average about 45%)
▸Roster continuity
Returning starters and the lineup's experience
32
Returning core4
0% of last season's starters · FBS median 32%
Experience61
11 career starts per starter · FBS median 12
▸Unit cohesion
QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played together
65
QB & coordinator—
QB & receivers72
4.8 games started together on average · FBS median 3.9
Line cohesion62
5.2 games per linemen pair · FBS median 5.2
Defensive cohesion58
4.3 games per defensive pair · FBS median 4.5
Climate · around the programlive

The administration, money and fans around the team: athletic director continuity, willingness to invest, and crowds.

▸Administration
Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignment
61
AD continuity61
Jared Mosley · year 4 (Wikipedia, CC BY-SA)
▸Investment
Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruiting
56
Football's share49
26% of department spending goes to football
Investment trend66
+37% over three years
Football investment52
$15.4M on football (2024-25 federal report)
Recruiting spend50
$0.68M men's recruiting
Department resources54
$58M athletic department revenue
▸Fan base
How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matter
56
Sellouts60
sellout crowds (95%+ of capacity) at 4 of 41 home games (last 8 seasons)
Sells out anyway51
sellout crowds at 1 of 31 games that didn't matter: cupcakes, or a team expected to lose or having a losing season

Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures, as reported by each school. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA). Attendance: reported crowds vs stadium capacity.

Gelhow it is working right now · moves week to week
Gel69Playing above its parts — Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by gamePlaying above its parts73Settled & sharp — A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normalSettled & sharp50Alignment — Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one pageAlignmentsoonResilience — Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversityResiliencesoonFan & media mood — Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins laterFan & media mood82Coach security — The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new ADCoach security86
InternalOn-field fitExternal
Internal · how the program talkscoming

How the team talks in press conferences and interviews, each program against its own normal, so a naturally terse coach isn't read as upset. Being built program by program, Big Ten first.

▸Alignment
Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one page
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.
▸Resilience
Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversity
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.

Readings are team-level; we don't publish psychological readings of individual players.

On-field fit · how it is playing togetherlive

How the team is playing together this season: beating or missing its preseason expectation, a settled lineup, clean execution.

▸Playing above its parts
Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by game
73
This season73
+4.7 points a game vs its preseason projection (5 games)
▸Settled & sharp
A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normal
50
This season50
81% of starters kept game to game
External · pressure from outsidelive

Pressure from outside the building: the hard-facts hot seat now; this season's fan and media mood as it is measured.

▸Fan & media mood
Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins later
82
This season82
outside the AP poll: projected #80 preseason -> #62 in our Index now · results 4-2 (+7, recent games count more)
▸Coach security
The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new AD
86
This season86
Neal Brown, year 1 · 67% wins so far · +4.7 pts a game vs preseason expectation

Dashed gold ring = typical (62). 20-50 is the warning zone; under 10 is a collapse. Spokes with no data yet are dashed and left out until they fill in. Chem blends the two halves, then places the blend among this season's teams.

Trend · Foundationeach program year runs Feb 1 to the title game
'1624'1752'1871'1963'2053'2162'2268'2330'2445'2558'262016 wk 1 vs SMU: 14 · L2016 wk 2 vs Bethune-Cookman: 35 · W2016 wk 3 vs Florida: 12 · L2016 wk 4 vs Rice: 17 · W2016 wk 5 vs Middle Tennessee: 14 · L2016 wk 6 vs Marshall: 15 · W2016 wk 8 vs Army: 25 · W2016 wk 9 vs UTSA: 26 · L2016 wk 10 vs Louisiana Tech: 25 · L2016 wk 11 vs Western Kentucky: 27 · L2016 wk 12 vs Southern Miss: 29 · W2016 wk 13 vs UTEP: 28 · L2016 wk 1 vs Army: 24 · L2017 wk 2 vs SMU: 53 · L2017 wk 3 vs Iowa: 57 · L2017 wk 4 vs UAB: 57 · W2017 wk 5 vs Southern Miss: 59 · W2017 wk 7 vs UTSA: 58 · W2017 wk 8 vs Florida Atlantic: 58 · L2017 wk 9 vs Old Dominion: 57 · W2017 wk 10 vs Louisiana Tech: 59 · W2017 wk 11 vs UTEP: 59 · W2017 wk 12 vs Army: 60 · W2017 wk 13 vs Rice: 60 · W2017 wk 14 vs Florida Atlantic: 58 · L2017 wk 1 vs Troy: 52 · L2018 wk 2 vs Incarnate Word: 70 · W2018 wk 3 vs Arkansas: 68 · W2018 wk 4 vs Liberty: 70 · W2018 wk 5 vs Louisiana Tech: 67 · L2018 wk 6 vs UTEP: 70 · W2018 wk 7 vs Southern Miss: 69 · W2018 wk 8 vs UAB: 69 · L2018 wk 9 vs Rice: 71 · W2018 wk 11 vs Old Dominion: 68 · L2018 wk 12 vs Florida Atlantic: 72 · W2018 wk 13 vs UTSA: 70 · W2018 wk 1 vs Utah State: 71 · L2019 wk 2 vs SMU: 60 · L2019 wk 3 vs California: 63 · L2019 wk 4 vs UTSA: 65 · W2019 wk 5 vs Houston: 65 · L2019 wk 7 vs Southern Miss: 64 · L2019 wk 8 vs Middle Tennessee: 64 · W2019 wk 9 vs Charlotte: 65 · L2019 wk 10 vs UTEP: 66 · W2019 wk 11 vs Louisiana Tech: 62 · L2019 wk 13 vs Rice: 62 · L2019 wk 14 vs UAB: 63 · L2020 wk 3 vs SMU: 52 · L2020 wk 5 vs Southern Miss: 51 · L2020 wk 6 vs Charlotte: 53 · L2020 wk 7 vs Middle Tennessee: 53 · W2020 wk 12 vs Rice: 57 · W2020 wk 13 vs UTSA: 54 · L2020 wk 14 vs Louisiana Tech: 57 · L2020 wk 15 vs UTEP: 57 · W2020 wk 1 vs App State: 53 · L2021 wk 2 vs SMU: 60 · L2021 wk 3 vs UAB: 60 · L2021 wk 4 vs Louisiana Tech: 60 · L2021 wk 6 vs Missouri: 60 · L2021 wk 7 vs Marshall: 63 · L2021 wk 8 vs Liberty: 61 · L2021 wk 9 vs Rice: 63 · W2021 wk 10 vs Southern Miss: 61 · W2021 wk 11 vs UTEP: 62 · W2021 wk 12 vs Florida International: 62 · W2021 wk 13 vs UTSA: 63 · W2021 wk 1 vs Miami (OH): 62 · L2022 wk 1 vs SMU: 71 · L2022 wk 2 vs Texas Southern: 70 · W2022 wk 3 vs UNLV: 70 · L2022 wk 4 vs Memphis: 71 · L2022 wk 5 vs Florida Atlantic: 70 · W2022 wk 7 vs Louisiana Tech: 67 · W2022 wk 8 vs UTSA: 70 · L2022 wk 9 vs Western Kentucky: 70 · W2022 wk 10 vs Florida International: 69 · W2022 wk 11 vs UAB: 70 · L2022 wk 13 vs Rice: 70 · W2022 wk 14 vs UTSA: 68 · L2022 wk 1 vs Boise State: 68 · L2023 wk 2 vs Florida International: 23 · L2023 wk 3 vs Louisiana Tech: 23 · W2023 wk 5 vs Abilene Christian: 21 · W2023 wk 6 vs Navy: 18 · L2023 wk 7 vs Temple: 28 · W2023 wk 8 vs Tulane: 32 · L2023 wk 9 vs Memphis: 33 · L2023 wk 10 vs UTSA: 34 · L2023 wk 11 vs SMU: 33 · L2023 wk 12 vs Tulsa: 31 · W2023 wk 13 vs UAB: 30 · W2024 wk 2 vs Stephen F. Austin: 52 · W2024 wk 3 vs Texas Tech: 52 · L2024 wk 4 vs Wyoming: 52 · W2024 wk 5 vs Tulsa: 50 · W2024 wk 7 vs Florida Atlantic: 51 · W2024 wk 8 vs Memphis: 51 · L2024 wk 9 vs Tulane: 51 · L2024 wk 11 vs Army: 50 · L2024 wk 12 vs UTSA: 53 · L2024 wk 13 vs East Carolina: 52 · L2024 wk 14 vs Temple: 49 · W2024 wk 1 vs Texas State: 45 · L2025 wk 2 vs Western Michigan: 54 · W2025 wk 3 vs Washington State: 57 · W2025 wk 4 vs Army: 57 · W2025 wk 5 vs South Alabama: 59 · W2025 wk 7 vs South Florida: 58 · L2025 wk 8 vs UTSA: 59 · W2025 wk 9 vs Charlotte: 57 · W2025 wk 10 vs Navy: 55 · W2025 wk 12 vs UAB: 58 · W2025 wk 13 vs Rice: 59 · W2025 wk 14 vs Temple: 58 · W2025 wk 15 vs Tulane: 56 · L2025 wk 1 vs San Diego State: 58 · W2026 wk 2 vs UNLV: 28 · W2026 wk 3 vs Texas State: 25 · L2026 wk 4 vs Houston Christian: 29 · W2026 wk 5 vs Tulsa: 30 · W2026 wk 6 vs Charlotte: 31 · W2026 wk 8 vs Navy: 34 · next gametypical 62

Every game since 2016, one continuous line; thin rules separate seasons and the chip is where each season finished. Navy dot = win, red = loss. Big drops usually mean a new staff, a new quarterback or a rebuilt line.

Trend · Gelthis season, after each game
typical 62wk 1 · on-field 54 · fan mood 51531wk 2 vs UNLV · W · on-field 41 · fan mood 78552wk 3 vs Texas State · L · on-field 44 · fan mood 59503wk 4 vs Houston Christian · W · on-field 49 · fan mood 68564wk 5 vs Tulsa · W · on-field 47 · fan mood 72565wk 6 vs Charlotte · W · on-field 54 · fan mood 75626

How the team is working right now, rebuilt after each game from only the games so far: on-field fit (results vs preseason expectation, lineup settling, execution) and that week's fan & media mood. Coach security is part of today's Gel number but isn't rebuilt week by week yet. Navy frame = win, red = loss.

Continuity facts
Head coach
Year 1
new this season
Offensive coordinator
Year —
at this school
Defensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
HC & OC together
— seasons
working together
QB with his OC
— seasons
same play-caller
QB & receivers
4.8 games
started together, average
Offensive line pairs
5.2 games
started together, average
Returning starters
0%
from last season
Starter experience
11 starts
career average
Internal facts
Pressers read
soon
this season, coaches and players
Coach tone
soon
vs his own normal
"We" vs "I"
soon
share of team language
Owning mistakes
soon
vs pointing outward
Same story
soon
coaches and players agree
After losses
soon
how fast tone recovers
Leaders named
soon
players teammates point to
Newcomers
soon
transfers talked about as part of it
Openness
soon
forthcoming vs guarded
Measured from press conferences and interviews, program by program.
Climate facts
Athletic director
Jared Mosley
year 4
Football spending
$15.4M
2024-25 federal report
Spending trend
+37%
over three years
Department revenue
$58M
all sports
Recruiting spend
$0.68M
men's teams
Home crowds
—
of capacity
Staff turnover
100%
on-field staff new this season
Fan mood
soon
fans and local media
Coach & AD
soon
on the same page
Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Offense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Jackson
White
Stevenson
Koch
Reese
Long
Umeozulu
Williams
Strong
Goodacre
Johnson
QBTayven Jackson66535666646
RBJahiem White66535666646
WRJustin Stevenson55524555535
WRKyle Koch33233333333
TEMax Reese55435555545
TEBrec Long66535666646
OLNeto Umeozulu66535666646
OLJohnny Williams IV66535666646
OLChandler Strong66535666646
OLWillie Goodacre44334444444
OLKeon Johnson66535666646

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Defense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Rhodes
Benton
Clark
Onuoha
Barker
Alexander
Allen
Jenkins
Coombes
Jones
Taylor
DLDavion Rhodes55535533545
DLJustin Benton56646643655
DLNolan Clark56646643655
DLDavid Onuoha34444422443
LBZakye Barker56646643655
LBAaron Alexander56646643655
DBBJ Allen Jr.34424442433
DBCameren Jenkins33323323323
DBCJ Coombes56646643655
DBBrandon Jones45545532554
DBPeyton Taylor55535533545

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Chemistry is Scorebook's own rating of how well a program fits together, on the same all-time 0-99 scale as our other ratings (compared with every FBS team since 2016; 62 is typical, 20-50 signals something is wrong, and single digits are reserved for true collapses; each season is compared with its own era). This early version blends continuity (who has played and coached together, and for how long; it counts most) with the climate around the program; how the program talks joins as it is measured. Within continuity, quarterback-centered pairings count most because they held up when we tested them against results. How our ratings work →