Scorebook
Join
Teams / Conference USA / Middle Tennessee
Index · this season
42
▼ Below its 5-year level -5
Career53since 1936
Peak652009
Last 547seasons
#132 nationally · 2-3 (0-1 conf)
Résumé #114 · record ahead of its play
Schedule so far #114
Margin ±5 pts (tightens with games)
Why 42? →

Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders

Conference USA · Murfreesboro, TN · Johnny "Red" Floyd Stadium · Head coach Derek Mason
Rival
Building rivalry
14-7 all time (21 meetings since 2005)
Middle Tennessee leads
Last: lost 56-30 (2025) · Florida International has won 2 straight
Wants it back
program traits are earned from history
No recognized national titles since 1936. Counted: AP poll champion, a coaches-poll champion, or the BCS / playoff title-game winner; a split year counts for both.0national titles
Heisman Trophy winners0Heisman
Seasons finishing in the AP top 10 since 19360AP top-10
Consensus All-Americans since 19360All-Americans
NFL draft picks since 19679NFL picks
Winning percentage since 193646.1%win pct
History since 1936 · football since 1999. Every season →
Chemistry
Chem 57: typical57
Chem 55: typical
55Foundation
Chem 60: typical
60Gel
gel counts 40% so far
at its usual level
early · #73 of 138
HC year3
Ret. starters36%
QB yrs w/ OC1
View chemistry →
Team chemistryearly · #73 of 138 FBS teams
Chem 55: typicalFoundation55+Chem 60: typicalGel60=Chem 57: typicalChem57Gel counts 40% so far (it grows as games are played, up to half)
Foundationwhat the program has built · moves over seasons
Foundation55Staff stability — Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnoverStaff stability58Roster continuity — Returning starters and the lineup's experienceRoster continuity45Unit cohesion — QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played togetherUnit cohesion56Administration — Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignmentAdministration99Investment — Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruitingInvestment57Fan base — How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matterFan base32
ContinuityClimate
Continuity · who has played and coached togetherlive

Who has played and coached together, and for how long, ranked against every FBS team at the same point of the season.

▸Staff stability
Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnover
58
Staff cohesion55
HC year 3 · OC year 1 · DC year 3
Assistant turnover61
43% of on-field staff new this season (FBS average about 45%)
▸Roster continuity
Returning starters and the lineup's experience
45
Returning core65
36% of last season's starters · FBS median 32%
Experience25
7 career starts per starter · FBS median 12
▸Unit cohesion
QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played together
56
QB & coordinator55
1st season together · same as 76% of FBS teams
QB & receivers60
3.8 games started together on average · FBS median 3.9
Line cohesion54
4.2 games per linemen pair · FBS median 5.2
Defensive cohesion54
4.1 games per defensive pair · FBS median 4.5
Climate · around the programlive

The administration, money and fans around the team: athletic director continuity, willingness to invest, and crowds.

▸Administration
Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignment
99
AD continuity99
Chris Massaro · year 11 (Wikipedia, CC BY-SA)
▸Investment
Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruiting
57
Football's share71
33% of department spending goes to football
Investment trend59
+25% over three years
Football investment47
$13.3M on football (2024-25 federal report)
Recruiting spend31
$0.46M men's recruiting
Department resources42
$40M athletic department revenue
▸Fan base
How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matter
32
Sellouts30
sellout crowds (95%+ of capacity) at 0 of 39 home games (last 8 seasons)
Sells out anyway34
sellout crowds at 0 of 30 games that didn't matter: cupcakes, or a team expected to lose or having a losing season

Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures, as reported by each school. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA). Attendance: reported crowds vs stadium capacity.

Gelhow it is working right now · moves week to week
Gel60Playing above its parts — Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by gamePlaying above its parts63Settled & sharp — A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normalSettled & sharp69Alignment — Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one pageAlignmentsoonResilience — Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversityResiliencesoonFan & media mood — Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins laterFan & media mood61Coach security — The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new ADCoach security39
InternalOn-field fitExternal
Internal · how the program talkscoming

How the team talks in press conferences and interviews, each program against its own normal, so a naturally terse coach isn't read as upset. Being built program by program, Big Ten first.

▸Alignment
Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one page
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.
▸Resilience
Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversity
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.

Readings are team-level; we don't publish psychological readings of individual players.

On-field fit · how it is playing togetherlive

How the team is playing together this season: beating or missing its preseason expectation, a settled lineup, clean execution.

▸Playing above its parts
Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by game
63
This season63
+0.4 points a game vs its preseason projection (4 games)
▸Settled & sharp
A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normal
69
This season69
82% of starters kept game to game
External · pressure from outsidelive

Pressure from outside the building: the hard-facts hot seat now; this season's fan and media mood as it is measured.

▸Fan & media mood
Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins later
61
This season61
outside the AP poll: projected #136 preseason -> #132 in our Index now · results 2-3 (-2, recent games count more)
▸Coach security
The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new AD
39
This season39
Derek Mason, year 3 · 40% wins so far · +0.4 pts a game vs preseason expectation · last two seasons -25% vs the program's norm

Dashed gold ring = typical (62). 20-50 is the warning zone; under 10 is a collapse. Spokes with no data yet are dashed and left out until they fill in. Chem blends the two halves, then places the blend among this season's teams.

Trend · Foundationeach program year runs Feb 1 to the title game
'1670'1762'1868'1956'2064'2160'2253'2366'2432'2554'262016 wk 1 vs Alabama A&M: 67 · W2016 wk 2 vs Vanderbilt: 78 · L2016 wk 3 vs Bowling Green: 72 · W2016 wk 4 vs Louisiana Tech: 76 · W2016 wk 5 vs North Texas: 72 · W2016 wk 7 vs Western Kentucky: 71 · L2016 wk 8 vs Missouri: 77 · W2016 wk 9 vs Florida International: 75 · W2016 wk 10 vs UTSA: 71 · L2016 wk 11 vs Marshall: 77 · L2016 wk 12 vs Charlotte: 64 · W2016 wk 13 vs Florida Atlantic: 67 · W2016 wk 1 vs Hawai'i: 70 · L2017 wk 2 vs Syracuse: 65 · W2017 wk 3 vs Minnesota: 66 · L2017 wk 4 vs Bowling Green: 66 · W2017 wk 5 vs Florida Atlantic: 62 · L2017 wk 6 vs Florida International: 63 · W2017 wk 7 vs UAB: 66 · L2017 wk 8 vs Marshall: 66 · L2017 wk 10 vs UTEP: 64 · W2017 wk 11 vs Charlotte: 64 · W2017 wk 12 vs Western Kentucky: 66 · L2017 wk 13 vs Old Dominion: 64 · W2017 wk 1 vs Arkansas State: 62 · W2018 wk 2 vs UT Martin: 73 · W2018 wk 3 vs Georgia: 72 · L2018 wk 5 vs Florida Atlantic: 73 · W2018 wk 6 vs Marshall: 72 · W2018 wk 7 vs Florida International: 72 · L2018 wk 8 vs Charlotte: 73 · W2018 wk 9 vs Old Dominion: 72 · W2018 wk 10 vs Western Kentucky: 72 · W2018 wk 11 vs UTEP: 74 · W2018 wk 12 vs Kentucky: 67 · L2018 wk 13 vs UAB: 67 · W2018 wk 14 vs UAB: 70 · L2018 wk 1 vs App State: 68 · L2019 wk 2 vs Tennessee State: 58 · W2019 wk 3 vs Duke: 60 · L2019 wk 5 vs Iowa: 60 · L2019 wk 6 vs Marshall: 60 · W2019 wk 7 vs Florida Atlantic: 62 · L2019 wk 8 vs North Texas: 62 · L2019 wk 9 vs Florida International: 62 · W2019 wk 10 vs Charlotte: 60 · L2019 wk 12 vs Rice: 61 · L2019 wk 13 vs Old Dominion: 62 · W2019 wk 14 vs Western Kentucky: 56 · L2020 wk 3 vs Troy: 67 · L2020 wk 4 vs UTSA: 65 · L2020 wk 5 vs Western Kentucky: 64 · L2020 wk 6 vs Florida International: 67 · W2020 wk 7 vs North Texas: 65 · L2020 wk 8 vs Rice: 64 · W2020 wk 11 vs Marshall: 65 · L2020 wk 12 vs Troy: 64 · W2021 wk 2 vs Virginia Tech: 60 · L2021 wk 3 vs UTSA: 62 · L2021 wk 4 vs Charlotte: 59 · L2021 wk 5 vs Marshall: 52 · W2021 wk 6 vs Liberty: 54 · L2021 wk 8 vs UConn: 59 · W2021 wk 9 vs Southern Miss: 60 · W2021 wk 10 vs Western Kentucky: 59 · L2021 wk 11 vs Florida International: 54 · W2021 wk 12 vs Old Dominion: 56 · L2021 wk 13 vs Florida Atlantic: 61 · W2021 wk 1 vs Toledo: 60 · W2022 wk 2 vs Colorado State: 55 · W2022 wk 3 vs Tennessee State: 54 · W2022 wk 4 vs Miami: 53 · W2022 wk 5 vs UTSA: 54 · L2022 wk 6 vs UAB: 57 · L2022 wk 7 vs Western Kentucky: 57 · L2022 wk 9 vs UTEP: 57 · W2022 wk 10 vs Louisiana Tech: 55 · L2022 wk 11 vs Charlotte: 55 · W2022 wk 12 vs Florida Atlantic: 50 · W2022 wk 13 vs Florida International: 49 · W2022 wk 1 vs San Diego State: 53 · W2023 wk 2 vs Missouri: 66 · L2023 wk 3 vs Murray State: 66 · W2023 wk 4 vs Colorado State: 65 · L2023 wk 5 vs Western Kentucky: 65 · L2023 wk 6 vs Jacksonville State: 65 · L2023 wk 7 vs Louisiana Tech: 63 · W2023 wk 8 vs Liberty: 64 · L2023 wk 10 vs New Mexico State: 64 · L2023 wk 11 vs Florida International: 66 · W2023 wk 12 vs UTEP: 66 · W2023 wk 13 vs Sam Houston: 66 · L2024 wk 2 vs Ole Miss: 29 · L2024 wk 3 vs Western Kentucky: 30 · L2024 wk 4 vs Duke: 28 · L2024 wk 5 vs Memphis: 28 · L2024 wk 7 vs Louisiana Tech: 30 · L2024 wk 8 vs Kennesaw State: 31 · W2024 wk 9 vs Jacksonville State: 30 · L2024 wk 10 vs UTEP: 29 · W2024 wk 11 vs Liberty: 30 · L2024 wk 13 vs New Mexico State: 31 · L2024 wk 14 vs Florida International: 32 · L2025 wk 2 vs Wisconsin: 66 · L2025 wk 3 vs Nevada: 63 · W2025 wk 4 vs Marshall: 63 · L2025 wk 5 vs Kennesaw State: 64 · L2025 wk 7 vs Missouri State: 61 · L2025 wk 9 vs Delaware: 60 · L2025 wk 10 vs Jacksonville State: 61 · L2025 wk 11 vs Florida International: 61 · L2025 wk 12 vs Western Kentucky: 59 · L2025 wk 13 vs Sam Houston: 53 · W2025 wk 14 vs New Mexico State: 54 · W2026 wk 2 vs Marshall: 55 · L2026 wk 3 vs Nevada: 54 · W2026 wk 4 vs Jacksonville State: 55 · L2026 wk 5 vs Kansas: 56 · L2026 wk 7 vs Delaware: 56 · next gametypical 62

Every game since 2016, one continuous line; thin rules separate seasons and the chip is where each season finished. Navy dot = win, red = loss. Big drops usually mean a new staff, a new quarterback or a rebuilt line.

Trend · Gelthis season, after each game
typical 62wk 2 vs Marshall · L · on-field 63 · fan mood 60622wk 3 vs Nevada · W · on-field 55 · fan mood 72623wk 4 vs Jacksonville State · L · on-field 65 · fan mood 69674wk 5 vs Kansas · L · on-field 68 · fan mood 65675

How the team is working right now, rebuilt after each game from only the games so far: on-field fit (results vs preseason expectation, lineup settling, execution) and that week's fan & media mood. Coach security is part of today's Gel number but isn't rebuilt week by week yet. Navy frame = win, red = loss.

Continuity facts
Head coach
Year 3
at this school
Offensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
Defensive coordinator
Year 3
at this school
HC & OC together
1 seasons
working together
QB with his OC
1 seasons
same play-caller
QB & receivers
3.8 games
started together, average
Offensive line pairs
4.2 games
started together, average
Returning starters
36%
from last season
Starter experience
7 starts
career average
Internal facts
Pressers read
soon
this season, coaches and players
Coach tone
soon
vs his own normal
"We" vs "I"
soon
share of team language
Owning mistakes
soon
vs pointing outward
Same story
soon
coaches and players agree
After losses
soon
how fast tone recovers
Leaders named
soon
players teammates point to
Newcomers
soon
transfers talked about as part of it
Openness
soon
forthcoming vs guarded
Measured from press conferences and interviews, program by program.
Climate facts
Athletic director
Chris Massaro
year 11
Football spending
$13.3M
2024-25 federal report
Spending trend
+25%
over three years
Department revenue
$40M
all sports
Recruiting spend
$0.46M
men's teams
Home crowds
—
of capacity
Staff turnover
43%
on-field staff new this season
Fan mood
soon
fans and local media
Coach & AD
soon
on the same page
Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Offense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Gagliano
Martin
Allen
Wasson
Lacy
Perdue
Smith
Tripp
Moreno
Butler
Edwards
QBRoman Gagliano84417335555
RBAntonio Martin44314224444
WRMarkus Allen43414334444
WRHogan Wasson11111111111
WRCam'ron Lacy744113335555
TEKoraun Perdue32313333333
OLBrennan Smith32313333333
OLReese Tripp54415335555
OLChris Moreno54415335555
OLQuentin Butler54415335555
OLTrevaris Edwards54415335555

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Defense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Hixon
Butts
Simpson-Smith
Call
Taylor
Smith
Woods
Lowe
Johnson
Williams
Hardy
DLFelix Hixon64445666443
DLAidan Butts44334444433
DLZeion Simpson-Smith43434444343
LBKaven Call43344444332
LBAshton Taylor54445555443
LBKorey Smith644451098443
DBKalen Woods6444591412443
DBJackson Lowe6444581214443
DBJames Johnson44334444433
DBBryce Williams43434444343
DBJason Hardy33323333333

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Chemistry is Scorebook's own rating of how well a program fits together, on the same all-time 0-99 scale as our other ratings (compared with every FBS team since 2016; 62 is typical, 20-50 signals something is wrong, and single digits are reserved for true collapses; each season is compared with its own era). This early version blends continuity (who has played and coached together, and for how long; it counts most) with the climate around the program; how the program talks joins as it is measured. Within continuity, quarterback-centered pairings count most because they held up when we tested them against results. How our ratings work →