Scorebook
Join
Teams / Sun Belt / Marshall
Index · this season
52
▼ Below its 5-year level -11▼ Down 5 this season
Career51since 1936
Peak792014
Last 563seasons
#119 nationally · 3-3 (0-2 conf)
Résumé #110
Schedule so far #119
Margin ±5 pts (tightens with games)
Why 52? →

Marshall Thundering Herd

Sun Belt · Huntington, WV · Joan C. Edwards Stadium · Head coach Tony Gibson
Rival
Building rivalry
10-1 all time (11 meetings since 2014)
Marshall leads
Last: won 48-24 (2025) · Marshall has won 8 straight
Holds it
program traits are earned from history
No recognized national titles since 1936. Counted: AP poll champion, a coaches-poll champion, or the BCS / playoff title-game winner; a split year counts for both.0national titles
Heisman Trophy winners0Heisman
Seasons finishing in the AP top 10 since 19361AP top-10
Consensus All-Americans since 19360All-Americans
NFL draft picks since 196726NFL picks
Winning percentage since 193644.2%win pct
History since 1936 · football since 1959. Every season →
Chemistry
Chem 52: typical52
Chem 59: typical
59Foundation
Chem 44: warning zone
44Gel
gel counts 45% so far
at its usual level
early · #95 of 138
HC year2
Ret. starters50%
QB yrs w/ OC2
View chemistry →
Team chemistryearly · #95 of 138 FBS teams
Chem 59: typicalFoundation59+Chem 44: warning zoneGel44=Chem 52: typicalChem52Gel counts 45% so far (it grows as games are played, up to half)
Foundationwhat the program has built · moves over seasons
Foundation59Staff stability — Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnoverStaff stability56Roster continuity — Returning starters and the lineup's experienceRoster continuity72Unit cohesion — QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played togetherUnit cohesion77Administration — Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignmentAdministration49Investment — Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruitingInvestment45Fan base — How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matterFan base40
ContinuityClimate
Continuity · who has played and coached togetherlive

Who has played and coached together, and for how long, ranked against every FBS team at the same point of the season.

▸Staff stability
Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnover
56
Staff cohesion44
HC year 2 · OC year 2 · DC year 1
Assistant turnover67
33% of on-field staff new this season (FBS average about 45%)
▸Roster continuity
Returning starters and the lineup's experience
72
Returning core80
50% of last season's starters · FBS median 32%
Experience64
12 career starts per starter · FBS median 12
▸Unit cohesion
QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played together
77
QB & coordinator80
2 seasons together · same as 20% of FBS teams
QB & receivers89
9.8 games started together on average · FBS median 3.9
Line cohesion71
6.3 games per linemen pair · FBS median 5.2
Defensive cohesion60
4.5 games per defensive pair · FBS median 4.5
Climate · around the programlive

The administration, money and fans around the team: athletic director continuity, willingness to invest, and crowds.

▸Administration
Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignment
49
AD continuity49
Gerald Harrison · year 2 (Wikipedia, CC BY-SA)
▸Investment
Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruiting
45
Football's share60
29% of department spending goes to football
Investment trend27
+3% over three years
Football investment48
$13.6M on football (2024-25 federal report)
Recruiting spend47
$0.61M men's recruiting
Department resources48
$47M athletic department revenue
▸Fan base
How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matter
40
Sellouts30
sellout crowds (95%+ of capacity) at 0 of 41 home games (last 8 seasons)
Sells out anyway49
sellout crowds at 0 of 20 games that didn't matter: cupcakes, or a team expected to lose or having a losing season

Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures, as reported by each school. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA). Attendance: reported crowds vs stadium capacity.

Gelhow it is working right now · moves week to week
Gel44Playing above its parts — Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by gamePlaying above its parts29Settled & sharp — A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normalSettled & sharp49Alignment — Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one pageAlignmentsoonResilience — Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversityResiliencesoonFan & media mood — Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins laterFan & media mood37Coach security — The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new ADCoach security55
InternalOn-field fitExternal
Internal · how the program talkscoming

How the team talks in press conferences and interviews, each program against its own normal, so a naturally terse coach isn't read as upset. Being built program by program, Big Ten first.

▸Alignment
Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one page
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.
▸Resilience
Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversity
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.

Readings are team-level; we don't publish psychological readings of individual players.

On-field fit · how it is playing togetherlive

How the team is playing together this season: beating or missing its preseason expectation, a settled lineup, clean execution.

▸Playing above its parts
Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by game
29
This season29
-7.6 points a game vs its preseason projection (5 games)
▸Settled & sharp
A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normal
49
This season49
87% of starters kept game to game
External · pressure from outsidelive

Pressure from outside the building: the hard-facts hot seat now; this season's fan and media mood as it is measured.

▸Fan & media mood
Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins later
37
This season37
outside the AP poll: projected #95 preseason -> #119 in our Index now · beat rival Middle Tennessee 28-26 (+3) · results 3-3 (-2, recent games count more)
▸Coach security
The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new AD
55
This season55
Tony Gibson, year 2 · 50% wins so far · -7.6 pts a game vs preseason expectation · last two seasons -21% vs the program's norm

Dashed gold ring = typical (62). 20-50 is the warning zone; under 10 is a collapse. Spokes with no data yet are dashed and left out until they fill in. Chem blends the two halves, then places the blend among this season's teams.

Trend · Foundationeach program year runs Feb 1 to the title game
'1659'1763'1864'1968'2069'2142'2250'2352'2438'255'262016 wk 2 vs Morgan State: 72 · W2016 wk 3 vs Akron: 72 · L2016 wk 4 vs Louisville: 60 · L2016 wk 5 vs Pittsburgh: 62 · L2016 wk 6 vs North Texas: 59 · L2016 wk 7 vs Florida Atlantic: 63 · W2016 wk 8 vs Charlotte: 66 · L2016 wk 9 vs Southern Miss: 66 · L2016 wk 10 vs Old Dominion: 64 · L2016 wk 11 vs Middle Tennessee: 62 · W2016 wk 12 vs Florida International: 59 · L2016 wk 13 vs Western Kentucky: 59 · L2017 wk 2 vs NC State: 67 · L2017 wk 3 vs Kent State: 69 · W2017 wk 5 vs Cincinnati: 68 · W2017 wk 6 vs Charlotte: 69 · W2017 wk 7 vs Old Dominion: 70 · W2017 wk 8 vs Middle Tennessee: 69 · W2017 wk 9 vs Florida International: 68 · L2017 wk 10 vs Florida Atlantic: 68 · L2017 wk 11 vs Western Kentucky: 67 · W2017 wk 12 vs UTSA: 66 · L2017 wk 13 vs Southern Miss: 65 · L2017 wk 1 vs Colorado State: 63 · W2018 wk 2 vs Eastern Kentucky: 61 · W2018 wk 4 vs NC State: 61 · L2018 wk 5 vs Western Kentucky: 67 · W2018 wk 6 vs Middle Tennessee: 66 · L2018 wk 7 vs Old Dominion: 64 · W2018 wk 8 vs Florida Atlantic: 65 · W2018 wk 10 vs Southern Miss: 66 · L2018 wk 11 vs Charlotte: 67 · W2018 wk 12 vs UTSA: 66 · W2018 wk 13 vs Florida International: 67 · W2018 wk 14 vs Virginia Tech: 68 · L2018 wk 1 vs South Florida: 64 · W2019 wk 2 vs Boise State: 68 · L2019 wk 3 vs Ohio: 68 · W2019 wk 5 vs Cincinnati: 68 · L2019 wk 6 vs Middle Tennessee: 69 · L2019 wk 7 vs Old Dominion: 70 · W2019 wk 8 vs Florida Atlantic: 69 · W2019 wk 9 vs Western Kentucky: 69 · W2019 wk 10 vs Rice: 68 · W2019 wk 12 vs Louisiana Tech: 70 · W2019 wk 13 vs Charlotte: 69 · L2019 wk 14 vs Florida International: 70 · W2019 wk 1 vs UCF: 68 · L2020 wk 3 vs App State: 66 · W2020 wk 6 vs Western Kentucky: 67 · W2020 wk 7 vs Louisiana Tech: 69 · W2020 wk 8 vs Florida Atlantic: 68 · W2020 wk 10 vs Massachusetts: 69 · W2020 wk 11 vs Middle Tennessee: 69 · W2020 wk 14 vs Rice: 70 · L2020 wk 16 vs UAB: 68 · L2020 wk 1 vs Buffalo: 69 · L2021 wk 2 vs North Carolina Central: 41 · W2021 wk 3 vs East Carolina: 43 · L2021 wk 4 vs App State: 43 · L2021 wk 5 vs Middle Tennessee: 43 · L2021 wk 6 vs Old Dominion: 43 · W2021 wk 7 vs North Texas: 44 · W2021 wk 9 vs Florida International: 42 · W2021 wk 10 vs Florida Atlantic: 44 · W2021 wk 11 vs UAB: 43 · L2021 wk 12 vs Charlotte: 42 · W2021 wk 13 vs Western Kentucky: 44 · L2021 wk 1 vs Louisiana: 42 · L2022 wk 2 vs Notre Dame: 53 · W2022 wk 3 vs Bowling Green: 54 · L2022 wk 4 vs Troy: 55 · L2022 wk 5 vs Gardner-Webb: 54 · W2022 wk 7 vs Louisiana: 54 · L2022 wk 8 vs James Madison: 55 · W2022 wk 9 vs Coastal Carolina: 53 · L2022 wk 10 vs Old Dominion: 53 · W2022 wk 11 vs App State: 50 · W2022 wk 12 vs Georgia Southern: 52 · W2022 wk 13 vs Georgia State: 55 · W2022 wk 1 vs UConn: 50 · W2023 wk 2 vs East Carolina: 56 · W2023 wk 4 vs Virginia Tech: 57 · W2023 wk 5 vs Old Dominion: 55 · W2023 wk 6 vs NC State: 56 · L2023 wk 7 vs Georgia State: 55 · L2023 wk 8 vs James Madison: 55 · L2023 wk 9 vs Coastal Carolina: 53 · L2023 wk 10 vs App State: 53 · L2023 wk 11 vs Georgia Southern: 55 · W2023 wk 12 vs South Alabama: 46 · L2023 wk 13 vs Arkansas State: 48 · W2023 wk 1 vs UTSA: 52 · L2024 wk 2 vs Virginia Tech: 42 · L2024 wk 4 vs Ohio State: 43 · L2024 wk 5 vs Western Michigan: 43 · W2024 wk 6 vs App State: 42 · W2024 wk 7 vs Georgia Southern: 43 · L2024 wk 8 vs Georgia State: 44 · W2024 wk 10 vs UL Monroe: 45 · W2024 wk 11 vs Southern Miss: 45 · W2024 wk 12 vs Coastal Carolina: 46 · W2024 wk 13 vs Old Dominion: 47 · W2024 wk 14 vs James Madison: 46 · W2024 wk 15 vs Louisiana: 38 · W2025 wk 2 vs Missouri State: 0 · L2025 wk 3 vs Eastern Kentucky: 0 · W2025 wk 4 vs Middle Tennessee: 1 · W2025 wk 5 vs Louisiana: 2 · L2025 wk 7 vs Old Dominion: 3 · W2025 wk 8 vs Texas State: 4 · W2025 wk 10 vs Coastal Carolina: 5 · L2025 wk 11 vs James Madison: 5 · L2025 wk 12 vs Georgia State: 2 · W2025 wk 13 vs App State: 2 · L2025 wk 14 vs Georgia Southern: 5 · L2026 wk 2 vs Middle Tennessee: 57 · W2026 wk 3 vs Missouri State: 58 · W2026 wk 4 vs Gardner-Webb: 58 · W2026 wk 5 vs James Madison: 51 · L2026 wk 6 vs Coastal Carolina: 58 · L2026 wk 8 vs South Alabama: 58 · next gametypical 62

Every game since 2016, one continuous line; thin rules separate seasons and the chip is where each season finished. Navy dot = win, red = loss. Big drops usually mean a new staff, a new quarterback or a rebuilt line.

Trend · Gelthis season, after each game
typical 62wk 1 · on-field 50 · fan mood 31431wk 2 vs Middle Tennessee · W · on-field 61 · fan mood 39532wk 3 vs Missouri State · W · on-field 68 · fan mood 43583wk 4 vs Gardner-Webb · W · on-field 59 · fan mood 45544wk 5 vs James Madison · L · on-field 49 · fan mood 40465wk 6 vs Coastal Carolina · L · on-field 45 · fan mood 32406

How the team is working right now, rebuilt after each game from only the games so far: on-field fit (results vs preseason expectation, lineup settling, execution) and that week's fan & media mood. Coach security is part of today's Gel number but isn't rebuilt week by week yet. Navy frame = win, red = loss.

Continuity facts
Head coach
Year 2
at this school
Offensive coordinator
Year 2
at this school
Defensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
HC & OC together
2 seasons
working together
QB with his OC
2 seasons
same play-caller
QB & receivers
9.8 games
started together, average
Offensive line pairs
6.3 games
started together, average
Returning starters
50%
from last season
Starter experience
12 starts
career average
Internal facts
Pressers read
soon
this season, coaches and players
Coach tone
soon
vs his own normal
"We" vs "I"
soon
share of team language
Owning mistakes
soon
vs pointing outward
Same story
soon
coaches and players agree
After losses
soon
how fast tone recovers
Leaders named
soon
players teammates point to
Newcomers
soon
transfers talked about as part of it
Openness
soon
forthcoming vs guarded
Measured from press conferences and interviews, program by program.
Climate facts
Athletic director
Gerald Harrison
year 2
Football spending
$13.6M
2024-25 federal report
Spending trend
+3%
over three years
Department revenue
$47M
all sports
Recruiting spend
$0.61M
men's teams
Home crowds
—
of capacity
Staff turnover
33%
on-field staff new this season
Fan mood
soon
fans and local media
Coach & AD
soon
on the same page
Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Offense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Rio-Wilson
Price
Turner-Bradshaw
Tamarez
Sweeney
Payne
Montgomery
Slappy
Martin
Laird
Dudley
QBCarlos Del Rio-Wilson1616116161516646
RBJudah Price11111111111
WRXayvion Turner-Bradshaw61625666535
WRDe'Andre Tamarez1112121121112111
WROwen Sweeney61516666646
TEToby Payne1616126291729646
OLTariq Montgomery1516116171717646
OLJalen Slappy1616126291736646
OLRobby Martin61516666646
OLJack Laird41314444444
OLAndrew Dudley61516666646

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Defense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
McBride
Ward
Chmura
Hardge
Gilmore
Marshall
Smith
Pierre-Louis
Clark-Glover
Hall
McCartherens
DLKelvon McBride64666264662
DLBraydin Ward44444144442
DLCam Chmura64666264662
DLKenyatta Hardge64666264662
LBJavae Gilmore64661621211962
LBJalen Marshall21222221221
DBDaytione Smith64661222011662
DBJosh Pierre-Louis44441111113642
DBCaleb Clark-Glover64669266962
DBBrayden Hall64666264662
DBCharles McCartherens22222122222

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Chemistry is Scorebook's own rating of how well a program fits together, on the same all-time 0-99 scale as our other ratings (compared with every FBS team since 2016; 62 is typical, 20-50 signals something is wrong, and single digits are reserved for true collapses; each season is compared with its own era). This early version blends continuity (who has played and coached together, and for how long; it counts most) with the climate around the program; how the program talks joins as it is measured. Within continuity, quarterback-centered pairings count most because they held up when we tested them against results. How our ratings work →