Scorebook
Join
Teams / SEC / Kentucky
Index · this season
73
at its 5-year level▲ Up 8 this season
Career67since 1936
Peak901950
Last 571seasons
#37 nationally · 5-1 (3-1 conf)
Résumé #2 · record ahead of its play
Schedule so far #10
Margin ±5 pts (tightens with games)
Why 73? →

Kentucky Wildcats

SEC · Lexington, KY · Kroger Field · Head coach Will Stein
Rival
Heated rivalry
17-17 all time (34 meetings since 1915)
Series tied
Last: lost 41-0 (2025) · Louisville has won 2 straight
Wants it back
program traits are earned from history
No recognized national titles since 1936. Counted: AP poll champion, a coaches-poll champion, or the BCS / playoff title-game winner; a split year counts for both. The school claims 1.0national titles
Heisman Trophy winners0Heisman
Seasons finishing in the AP top 10 since 19362AP top-10
Consensus All-Americans since 193612All-Americans
NFL draft picks since 196798NFL picks
Winning percentage since 193646.4%win pct
History since 1936 · football since 1895. Every season →
Chemistry
Chem 48: new staff, still building48
Chem 13: collapse
13Foundation
Chem 90: elite
90Gel
gel counts 45% so far
▼ Below its norm -17Trending up
early · #109 of 138
HC year1
Ret. starters27%
QB yrs w/ OC1
View chemistry →
Team chemistryearly · #109 of 138 FBS teams
Chem 13: collapseFoundation13+Chem 90: eliteGel90=Chem 48: warning zoneChem48Gel counts 45% so far (it grows as games are played, up to half)
Foundationwhat the program has built · moves over seasons
Foundation13Staff stability — Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnoverStaff stability18Roster continuity — Returning starters and the lineup's experienceRoster continuity58Unit cohesion — QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played togetherUnit cohesion40Administration — Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignmentAdministration30Investment — Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruitingInvestment50Fan base — How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matterFan base76
ContinuityClimate
Continuity · who has played and coached togetherlive

Who has played and coached together, and for how long, ranked against every FBS team at the same point of the season.

▸Staff stability
Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnover
18
Staff cohesion10
HC year 1 · OC year 1 · DC year 1
Assistant turnover27
89% of on-field staff new this season (FBS average about 45%)
▸Roster continuity
Returning starters and the lineup's experience
58
Returning core53
27% of last season's starters · FBS median 32%
Experience62
12 career starts per starter · FBS median 12
▸Unit cohesion
QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played together
40
QB & coordinator55
1st season together · same as 76% of FBS teams
QB & receivers47
2.8 games started together on average · FBS median 3.9
Line cohesion27
3.0 games per linemen pair · FBS median 5.2
Defensive cohesion19
2.7 games per defensive pair · FBS median 4.5
Climate · around the programlive

The administration, money and fans around the team: athletic director continuity, willingness to invest, and crowds.

▸Administration
Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignment
30
AD continuity30
J Batt · year 1 (Wikipedia, CC BY-SA)
▸Investment
Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruiting
50
Football's share29
23% of department spending goes to football
Investment trend48
+15% over three years
Football investment71
$43.3M on football (2024-25 federal report)
Recruiting spend82
$2.98M men's recruiting
Department resources78
$187M athletic department revenue
▸Fan base
How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matter
76
Sellouts75
sellout crowds (95%+ of capacity) at 32 of 51 home games (last 8 seasons)
Sells out anyway77
sellout crowds at 22 of 33 games that didn't matter: cupcakes, or a team expected to lose or having a losing season

Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures, as reported by each school. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA). Attendance: reported crowds vs stadium capacity.

Gelhow it is working right now · moves week to week
Gel90Playing above its parts — Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by gamePlaying above its parts86Settled & sharp — A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normalSettled & sharp85Alignment — Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one pageAlignmentsoonResilience — Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversityResiliencesoonFan & media mood — Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins laterFan & media mood99Coach security — The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new ADCoach security89
InternalOn-field fitExternal
Internal · how the program talkscoming

How the team talks in press conferences and interviews, each program against its own normal, so a naturally terse coach isn't read as upset. Being built program by program, Big Ten first.

▸Alignment
Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one page
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.
▸Resilience
Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversity
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.

Readings are team-level; we don't publish psychological readings of individual players.

On-field fit · how it is playing togetherlive

How the team is playing together this season: beating or missing its preseason expectation, a settled lineup, clean execution.

▸Playing above its parts
Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by game
86
This season86
+8.4 points a game vs its preseason projection (5 games)
▸Settled & sharp
A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normal
85
This season85
89% of starters kept game to game
External · pressure from outsidelive

Pressure from outside the building: the hard-facts hot seat now; this season's fan and media mood as it is measured.

▸Fan & media mood
Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins later
99
This season99
outside the AP poll: projected #67 preseason -> #37 in our Index now · results 5-1 (+19, recent games count more) · bowl team out of nowhere (3.7 wins preseason -> 7.7) (+10)
▸Coach security
The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new AD
89
This season89
Will Stein, year 1 · 83% wins so far · +8.4 pts a game vs preseason expectation · new athletic director

Dashed gold ring = typical (62). 20-50 is the warning zone; under 10 is a collapse. Spokes with no data yet are dashed and left out until they fill in. Chem blends the two halves, then places the blend among this season's teams.

Trend · Foundationeach program year runs Feb 1 to the title game
'1663'1764'1864'1958'2073'2163'2262'2370'2471'2567'262016 wk 1 vs Southern Miss: 63 · L2016 wk 2 vs Florida: 63 · L2016 wk 3 vs New Mexico State: 53 · W2016 wk 4 vs South Carolina: 56 · W2016 wk 5 vs Alabama: 53 · L2016 wk 6 vs Vanderbilt: 55 · W2016 wk 8 vs Mississippi State: 56 · W2016 wk 9 vs Missouri: 63 · W2016 wk 10 vs Georgia: 65 · L2016 wk 11 vs Tennessee: 66 · L2016 wk 12 vs Austin Peay: 66 · W2016 wk 13 vs Louisville: 65 · W2016 wk 1 vs Georgia Tech: 63 · L2017 wk 6 vs Missouri: 63 · W2017 wk 8 vs Mississippi State: 67 · L2017 wk 9 vs Tennessee: 66 · W2017 wk 10 vs Ole Miss: 67 · L2017 wk 11 vs Vanderbilt: 66 · W2017 wk 12 vs Georgia: 67 · L2017 wk 13 vs Louisville: 67 · L2017 wk 1 vs Northwestern: 64 · L2018 wk 2 vs Florida: 68 · W2018 wk 3 vs Murray State: 67 · W2018 wk 4 vs Mississippi State: 66 · W2018 wk 5 vs South Carolina: 66 · W2018 wk 6 vs Texas A&M: 65 · L2018 wk 8 vs Vanderbilt: 64 · W2018 wk 9 vs Missouri: 66 · W2018 wk 10 vs Georgia: 67 · L2018 wk 11 vs Tennessee: 65 · L2018 wk 12 vs Middle Tennessee: 65 · W2018 wk 13 vs Louisville: 65 · W2018 wk 1 vs Penn State: 64 · W2019 wk 2 vs Eastern Michigan: 59 · W2019 wk 3 vs Florida: 60 · L2019 wk 4 vs Mississippi State: 57 · L2019 wk 5 vs South Carolina: 55 · L2019 wk 7 vs Arkansas: 55 · W2019 wk 8 vs Georgia: 54 · L2019 wk 9 vs Missouri: 58 · W2019 wk 11 vs Tennessee: 58 · L2019 wk 12 vs Vanderbilt: 59 · W2019 wk 13 vs UT Martin: 61 · W2019 wk 14 vs Louisville: 59 · W2019 wk 1 vs Virginia Tech: 58 · W2020 wk 5 vs Ole Miss: 72 · L2020 wk 6 vs Mississippi State: 72 · W2020 wk 7 vs Tennessee: 74 · W2020 wk 8 vs Missouri: 74 · L2020 wk 9 vs Georgia: 72 · L2020 wk 11 vs Vanderbilt: 66 · W2020 wk 12 vs Alabama: 73 · L2020 wk 13 vs Florida: 70 · L2020 wk 14 vs South Carolina: 74 · W2020 wk 1 vs NC State: 73 · W2021 wk 2 vs Missouri: 63 · W2021 wk 3 vs Chattanooga: 67 · W2021 wk 4 vs South Carolina: 66 · W2021 wk 5 vs Florida: 64 · W2021 wk 6 vs LSU: 62 · W2021 wk 7 vs Georgia: 65 · L2021 wk 9 vs Mississippi State: 63 · L2021 wk 10 vs Tennessee: 64 · L2021 wk 11 vs Vanderbilt: 64 · W2021 wk 12 vs New Mexico State: 61 · W2021 wk 13 vs Louisville: 64 · W2021 wk 1 vs Iowa: 63 · W2022 wk 2 vs Florida: 64 · W2022 wk 3 vs Youngstown State: 68 · W2022 wk 4 vs Northern Illinois: 67 · W2022 wk 5 vs Ole Miss: 66 · L2022 wk 6 vs South Carolina: 66 · L2022 wk 7 vs Mississippi State: 65 · W2022 wk 9 vs Tennessee: 65 · L2022 wk 10 vs Missouri: 64 · W2022 wk 11 vs Vanderbilt: 57 · L2022 wk 12 vs Georgia: 56 · L2022 wk 13 vs Louisville: 59 · W2022 wk 1 vs Iowa: 62 · L2023 wk 2 vs Eastern Kentucky: 70 · W2023 wk 3 vs Akron: 68 · W2023 wk 4 vs Vanderbilt: 68 · W2023 wk 5 vs Florida: 70 · W2023 wk 6 vs Georgia: 70 · L2023 wk 7 vs Missouri: 70 · L2023 wk 9 vs Tennessee: 70 · L2023 wk 10 vs Mississippi State: 70 · W2023 wk 11 vs Alabama: 71 · L2023 wk 12 vs South Carolina: 71 · L2023 wk 13 vs Louisville: 70 · W2023 wk 1 vs Clemson: 70 · L2024 wk 2 vs South Carolina: 67 · L2024 wk 3 vs Georgia: 65 · L2024 wk 4 vs Ohio: 65 · W2024 wk 5 vs Ole Miss: 70 · W2024 wk 7 vs Vanderbilt: 70 · L2024 wk 8 vs Florida: 71 · L2024 wk 9 vs Auburn: 72 · L2024 wk 10 vs Tennessee: 71 · L2024 wk 12 vs Murray State: 69 · W2024 wk 13 vs Texas: 68 · L2024 wk 14 vs Louisville: 71 · L2025 wk 2 vs Ole Miss: 70 · L2025 wk 3 vs Eastern Michigan: 71 · W2025 wk 5 vs South Carolina: 66 · L2025 wk 6 vs Georgia: 64 · L2025 wk 8 vs Texas: 70 · L2025 wk 9 vs Tennessee: 70 · L2025 wk 10 vs Auburn: 71 · W2025 wk 11 vs Florida: 71 · W2025 wk 12 vs Tennessee Tech: 71 · W2025 wk 13 vs Vanderbilt: 71 · L2025 wk 14 vs Louisville: 67 · L2026 wk 3 vs Texas A&M: 0 · W2026 wk 4 vs South Alabama: 2 · W2026 wk 5 vs South Carolina: 15 · W2026 wk 6 vs LSU: 13 · W2026 wk 7 vs Oklahoma: 13 · next gametypical 62

Every game since 2016, one continuous line; thin rules separate seasons and the chip is where each season finished. Navy dot = win, red = loss. Big drops usually mean a new staff, a new quarterback or a rebuilt line.

Trend · Gelthis season, after each game
typical 62wk 2 · on-field 57 · fan mood 48542wk 3 vs Texas A&M · W · on-field 73 · fan mood 79753wk 4 vs South Alabama · W · on-field 76 · fan mood 83794wk 5 vs South Carolina · W · on-field 81 · fan mood 99885wk 6 vs LSU · W · on-field 85 · fan mood 99906

How the team is working right now, rebuilt after each game from only the games so far: on-field fit (results vs preseason expectation, lineup settling, execution) and that week's fan & media mood. Coach security is part of today's Gel number but isn't rebuilt week by week yet. Navy frame = win, red = loss.

Continuity facts
Head coach
Year 1
new this season
Offensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
Defensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
HC & OC together
1 seasons
working together
QB with his OC
1 seasons
same play-caller
QB & receivers
2.8 games
started together, average
Offensive line pairs
3.0 games
started together, average
Returning starters
27%
from last season
Starter experience
12 starts
career average
Internal facts
Pressers read
soon
this season, coaches and players
Coach tone
soon
vs his own normal
"We" vs "I"
soon
share of team language
Owning mistakes
soon
vs pointing outward
Same story
soon
coaches and players agree
After losses
soon
how fast tone recovers
Leaders named
soon
players teammates point to
Newcomers
soon
transfers talked about as part of it
Openness
soon
forthcoming vs guarded
Measured from press conferences and interviews, program by program.
Climate facts
Athletic director
J Batt
year 1
Football spending
$43.3M
2024-25 federal report
Spending trend
+15%
over three years
Department revenue
$187M
all sports
Recruiting spend
$2.98M
men's teams
Home crowds
—
of capacity
Staff turnover
89%
on-field staff new this season
Fan mood
soon
fans and local media
Coach & AD
soon
on the same page
Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Offense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Minchey
Baxter
Anderson
Darby
Miller
Rodriguez
Tshabola
Price
Alinen
Wood
Heard
QBKenny Minchey33323333333
RBCJ Baxter33323333333
WRNic Anderson33323333333
WRKenny Darby22222222222
WRDJ Miller33326333333
TEWillie Rodriguez333231133343
OLTegra Tshabola33323333333
OLColeton Price33323333333
OLOlaus Alinen33323333333
OLMalachi Wood33323433373
OLLance Heard33323333333

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Defense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Williams
Humphrey-Grace
Edwards
Godfrey
Barnes
Works
Castell
Gates
Bryant
Nichols
Sykes
DLJaden Williams33133332323
DLMi'Quise Humphrey-Grace3131433321373
DLKalen Edwards11111111111
LBGrant Godfrey34143332423
LBElijah Barnes33133332323
LBCedric Works33133332323
DBJordan Castell33133332323
DBAaron Gates22122222212
DBTy Bryant3131433322583
DBTerhyon Nichols27122221882
DBHasaan Sykes33133332323

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Chemistry is Scorebook's own rating of how well a program fits together, on the same all-time 0-99 scale as our other ratings (compared with every FBS team since 2016; 62 is typical, 20-50 signals something is wrong, and single digits are reserved for true collapses; each season is compared with its own era). This early version blends continuity (who has played and coached together, and for how long; it counts most) with the climate around the program; how the program talks joins as it is measured. Within continuity, quarterback-centered pairings count most because they held up when we tested them against results. How our ratings work →