Scorebook
Join
Teams / Big 12 / Kansas State
Index · this season
71
▼ Below its 5-year level -9
Career62since 1936
Peak932002
Last 580seasons
#43 nationally · 3-2 (0-2 conf)
Résumé #72 · better than its record
Schedule so far #83
Margin ±5 pts (tightens with games)
Why 71? →

Kansas State Wildcats

Big 12 · Manhattan, KS · Bill Snyder Family Stadium · Head coach Collin Klein
Rival
Bitter rivalry
50-55-4 all time (109 meetings since 1917)
Iowa State leads
Last: lost 24-21 (2025) · Iowa State has won 3 straight
Wants it back
program traits are earned from history
No recognized national titles since 1936. Counted: AP poll champion, a coaches-poll champion, or the BCS / playoff title-game winner; a split year counts for both.0national titles
Heisman Trophy winners0Heisman
Seasons finishing in the AP top 10 since 19366AP top-10
Consensus All-Americans since 193611All-Americans
NFL draft picks since 196795NFL picks
Winning percentage since 193641.3%win pct
History since 1936 · football since 1902. Every season →
Chemistry
Chem 62: new staff, still building62
Chem 57: typical
57Foundation
Chem 70: strong
70Gel
gel counts 40% so far
at its usual levelTrending up
early · #48 of 138
HC year1
Ret. starters41%
QB yrs w/ OC1
View chemistry →
Team chemistryearly · #48 of 138 FBS teams
Chem 57: typicalFoundation57+Chem 70: strongGel70=Chem 62: typicalChem62Gel counts 40% so far (it grows as games are played, up to half)
Foundationwhat the program has built · moves over seasons
Foundation57Staff stability — Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnoverStaff stability32Roster continuity — Returning starters and the lineup's experienceRoster continuity67Unit cohesion — QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played togetherUnit cohesion65Administration — Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignmentAdministration78Investment — Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruitingInvestment54Fan base — How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matterFan base84
ContinuityClimate
Continuity · who has played and coached togetherlive

Who has played and coached together, and for how long, ranked against every FBS team at the same point of the season.

▸Staff stability
Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnover
32
Staff cohesion29
HC year 1 · OC year 1 · DC year 1
Assistant turnover34
86% of on-field staff new this season (FBS average about 45%)
▸Roster continuity
Returning starters and the lineup's experience
67
Returning core69
41% of last season's starters · FBS median 32%
Experience65
12 career starts per starter · FBS median 12
▸Unit cohesion
QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played together
65
QB & coordinator55
1st season together · same as 76% of FBS teams
QB & receivers96
11.8 games started together on average · FBS median 3.9
Line cohesion47
3.8 games per linemen pair · FBS median 5.2
Defensive cohesion52
4.0 games per defensive pair · FBS median 4.5
Climate · around the programlive

The administration, money and fans around the team: athletic director continuity, willingness to invest, and crowds.

▸Administration
Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignment
78
AD continuity78
Gene Taylor · year 10 (Wikipedia, CC BY-SA)
▸Investment
Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruiting
54
Football's share50
27% of department spending goes to football
Investment trend51
+16% over three years
Football investment62
$27.1M on football (2024-25 federal report)
Recruiting spend63
$1.52M men's recruiting
Department resources61
$103M athletic department revenue
▸Fan base
How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matter
84
Sellouts85
sellout crowds (95%+ of capacity) at 39 of 45 home games (last 8 seasons)
Sells out anyway83
sellout crowds at 21 of 25 games that didn't matter: cupcakes, or a team expected to lose or having a losing season

Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures, as reported by each school. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA). Attendance: reported crowds vs stadium capacity.

Gelhow it is working right now · moves week to week
Gel70Playing above its parts — Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by gamePlaying above its parts57Settled & sharp — A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normalSettled & sharp84Alignment — Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one pageAlignmentsoonResilience — Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversityResiliencesoonFan & media mood — Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins laterFan & media mood52Coach security — The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new ADCoach security75
InternalOn-field fitExternal
Internal · how the program talkscoming

How the team talks in press conferences and interviews, each program against its own normal, so a naturally terse coach isn't read as upset. Being built program by program, Big Ten first.

▸Alignment
Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one page
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.
▸Resilience
Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversity
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.

Readings are team-level; we don't publish psychological readings of individual players.

On-field fit · how it is playing togetherlive

How the team is playing together this season: beating or missing its preseason expectation, a settled lineup, clean execution.

▸Playing above its parts
Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by game
57
This season57
-1.2 points a game vs its preseason projection (4 games)
▸Settled & sharp
A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normal
84
This season84
92% of starters kept game to game
External · pressure from outsidelive

Pressure from outside the building: the hard-facts hot seat now; this season's fan and media mood as it is measured.

▸Fan & media mood
Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins later
52
This season52
outside the AP poll: projected #39 preseason -> #43 in our Index now · results 3-2 (-3, recent games count more)
▸Coach security
The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new AD
75
This season75
Collin Klein, year 1 · 60% wins so far · -1.2 pts a game vs preseason expectation

Dashed gold ring = typical (62). 20-50 is the warning zone; under 10 is a collapse. Spokes with no data yet are dashed and left out until they fill in. Chem blends the two halves, then places the blend among this season's teams.

Trend · Foundationeach program year runs Feb 1 to the title game
'1685'1761'1861'1956'2052'2162'2264'2367'2470'2568'262016 wk 1 vs Stanford: 84 · L2016 wk 3 vs Florida Atlantic: 91 · W2016 wk 4 vs Missouri State: 91 · W2016 wk 5 vs West Virginia: 83 · L2016 wk 6 vs Texas Tech: 87 · W2016 wk 7 vs Oklahoma: 87 · L2016 wk 8 vs Texas: 88 · W2016 wk 9 vs Iowa State: 88 · W2016 wk 10 vs Oklahoma State: 89 · L2016 wk 12 vs Baylor: 90 · W2016 wk 13 vs Kansas: 89 · W2016 wk 14 vs TCU: 86 · W2016 wk 1 vs Texas A&M: 85 · W2017 wk 2 vs Charlotte: 67 · W2017 wk 3 vs Vanderbilt: 68 · L2017 wk 5 vs Baylor: 69 · W2017 wk 6 vs Texas: 70 · L2017 wk 7 vs TCU: 71 · L2017 wk 8 vs Oklahoma: 65 · L2017 wk 9 vs Kansas: 65 · W2017 wk 10 vs Texas Tech: 67 · W2017 wk 11 vs West Virginia: 67 · L2017 wk 12 vs Oklahoma State: 65 · W2017 wk 13 vs Iowa State: 64 · W2017 wk 1 vs UCLA: 61 · W2018 wk 2 vs Mississippi State: 67 · L2018 wk 3 vs UTSA: 68 · W2018 wk 4 vs West Virginia: 68 · L2018 wk 5 vs Texas: 68 · L2018 wk 6 vs Baylor: 67 · L2018 wk 7 vs Oklahoma State: 68 · W2018 wk 9 vs Oklahoma: 66 · L2018 wk 10 vs TCU: 67 · L2018 wk 11 vs Kansas: 64 · W2018 wk 12 vs Texas Tech: 62 · W2018 wk 13 vs Iowa State: 61 · L2019 wk 2 vs Bowling Green: 51 · W2019 wk 3 vs Mississippi State: 52 · W2019 wk 5 vs Oklahoma State: 60 · L2019 wk 6 vs Baylor: 60 · L2019 wk 8 vs TCU: 60 · W2019 wk 9 vs Oklahoma: 59 · W2019 wk 10 vs Kansas: 60 · W2019 wk 11 vs Texas: 60 · L2019 wk 12 vs West Virginia: 58 · L2019 wk 13 vs Texas Tech: 60 · W2019 wk 14 vs Iowa State: 60 · W2019 wk 1 vs Navy: 56 · L2020 wk 4 vs Oklahoma: 57 · W2020 wk 5 vs Texas Tech: 55 · W2020 wk 6 vs TCU: 55 · W2020 wk 8 vs Kansas: 51 · W2020 wk 9 vs West Virginia: 53 · L2020 wk 10 vs Oklahoma State: 52 · L2020 wk 12 vs Iowa State: 55 · L2020 wk 13 vs Baylor: 53 · L2020 wk 14 vs Texas: 52 · L2021 wk 2 vs Southern Illinois: 63 · W2021 wk 3 vs Nevada: 64 · W2021 wk 4 vs Oklahoma State: 64 · L2021 wk 5 vs Oklahoma: 65 · L2021 wk 7 vs Iowa State: 65 · L2021 wk 8 vs Texas Tech: 67 · W2021 wk 9 vs TCU: 67 · W2021 wk 10 vs Kansas: 66 · W2021 wk 11 vs West Virginia: 65 · W2021 wk 12 vs Baylor: 66 · L2021 wk 13 vs Texas: 68 · L2021 wk 1 vs LSU: 62 · W2022 wk 2 vs Missouri: 66 · W2022 wk 3 vs Tulane: 66 · L2022 wk 4 vs Oklahoma: 67 · W2022 wk 5 vs Texas Tech: 68 · W2022 wk 6 vs Iowa State: 68 · W2022 wk 8 vs TCU: 69 · L2022 wk 9 vs Oklahoma State: 70 · W2022 wk 10 vs Texas: 66 · L2022 wk 11 vs Baylor: 69 · W2022 wk 12 vs West Virginia: 70 · W2022 wk 13 vs Kansas: 68 · W2022 wk 14 vs TCU: 66 · W2022 wk 1 vs Alabama: 64 · L2023 wk 2 vs Troy: 66 · W2023 wk 3 vs Missouri: 67 · L2023 wk 4 vs UCF: 67 · W2023 wk 6 vs Oklahoma State: 66 · L2023 wk 7 vs Texas Tech: 67 · W2023 wk 8 vs TCU: 67 · W2023 wk 9 vs Houston: 62 · W2023 wk 10 vs Texas: 68 · L2023 wk 11 vs Baylor: 68 · W2023 wk 12 vs Kansas: 69 · W2023 wk 13 vs Iowa State: 69 · L2023 wk 1 vs NC State: 67 · W2024 wk 2 vs Tulane: 68 · W2024 wk 3 vs Arizona: 69 · W2024 wk 4 vs BYU: 70 · L2024 wk 5 vs Oklahoma State: 69 · W2024 wk 7 vs Colorado: 70 · W2024 wk 8 vs West Virginia: 69 · W2024 wk 9 vs Kansas: 70 · W2024 wk 10 vs Houston: 70 · L2024 wk 12 vs Arizona State: 70 · L2024 wk 13 vs Cincinnati: 70 · W2024 wk 14 vs Iowa State: 69 · L2024 wk 1 vs Rutgers: 70 · W2025 wk 1 vs North Dakota: 69 · W2025 wk 2 vs Army: 71 · L2025 wk 3 vs Arizona: 70 · L2025 wk 5 vs UCF: 71 · W2025 wk 6 vs Baylor: 71 · L2025 wk 7 vs TCU: 70 · W2025 wk 9 vs Kansas: 70 · W2025 wk 10 vs Texas Tech: 70 · L2025 wk 12 vs Oklahoma State: 71 · W2025 wk 13 vs Utah: 69 · L2025 wk 14 vs Colorado: 68 · W2026 wk 2 vs Washington State: 56 · W2026 wk 3 vs Tulane: 57 · W2026 wk 4 vs Cincinnati: 58 · L2026 wk 6 vs Houston: 58 · L2026 wk 7 vs Kansas: 58 · next gametypical 62

Every game since 2016, one continuous line; thin rules separate seasons and the chip is where each season finished. Navy dot = win, red = loss. Big drops usually mean a new staff, a new quarterback or a rebuilt line.

Trend · Gelthis season, after each game
typical 62wk 2 vs Washington State · W · on-field 85 · fan mood 73802wk 3 vs Tulane · W · on-field 82 · fan mood 74793wk 4 vs Cincinnati · L · on-field 81 · fan mood 68764wk 6 vs Houston · L · on-field 78 · fan mood 50686

How the team is working right now, rebuilt after each game from only the games so far: on-field fit (results vs preseason expectation, lineup settling, execution) and that week's fan & media mood. Coach security is part of today's Gel number but isn't rebuilt week by week yet. Navy frame = win, red = loss.

Continuity facts
Head coach
Year 1
new this season
Offensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
Defensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
HC & OC together
1 seasons
working together
QB with his OC
1 seasons
same play-caller
QB & receivers
11.8 games
started together, average
Offensive line pairs
3.8 games
started together, average
Returning starters
41%
from last season
Starter experience
12 starts
career average
Internal facts
Pressers read
soon
this season, coaches and players
Coach tone
soon
vs his own normal
"We" vs "I"
soon
share of team language
Owning mistakes
soon
vs pointing outward
Same story
soon
coaches and players agree
After losses
soon
how fast tone recovers
Leaders named
soon
players teammates point to
Newcomers
soon
transfers talked about as part of it
Openness
soon
forthcoming vs guarded
Measured from press conferences and interviews, program by program.
Climate facts
Athletic director
Gene Taylor
year 10
Football spending
$27.1M
2024-25 federal report
Spending trend
+16%
over three years
Department revenue
$103M
all sports
Recruiting spend
$1.52M
men's teams
Home crowds
—
of capacity
Staff turnover
86%
on-field staff new this season
Fan mood
soon
fans and local media
Coach & AD
soon
on the same page
Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Offense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Johnson
Fields
White
Manning
Tibbs
Oakley
Morley
Howard
Hawkins
Villarouel
Adams
QBAvery Johnson32535162325655
RBRodney Fields Jr.55355525555
WRBrandon White33333313333
WRJosh Manning55355525555
WRJaron Tibbs16535161325555
TEGarrett Oakley23535132425555
OLTanner Morley22122222222
OLRyan Howard55355525555
OLGus Hawkins65355525655
OLDylan Villarouel55355525555
OLCharlie Adams55355525555

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Defense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Allen
Gregory
Bates
Jackson
Powers
Mason
Beasley
Patterson
Rich
Bartley
Scott
DLJordan Allen33313333333
DLWendell Gregory35515555555
DLTravis Bates35515555555
DLEli Jackson11111111111
LBGabe Powers35516555655
LBMekhi Mason35515555555
DBKoy Beasley35515555555
DBKaleb Patterson35515555555
DBZashon Rich355165551755
DBLogan Bartley35515555555
DBJoJo Scott35515555555

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Chemistry is Scorebook's own rating of how well a program fits together, on the same all-time 0-99 scale as our other ratings (compared with every FBS team since 2016; 62 is typical, 20-50 signals something is wrong, and single digits are reserved for true collapses; each season is compared with its own era). This early version blends continuity (who has played and coached together, and for how long; it counts most) with the climate around the program; how the program talks joins as it is measured. Within continuity, quarterback-centered pairings count most because they held up when we tested them against results. How our ratings work →