Scorebook
Join
Teams / Sun Belt / James Madison
Index · this season
70
at its 5-year level▲ Up 6 this season
Career72since 1936
Peak762025
Last 572seasons
#46 nationally · 6-0 (3-0 conf)
Résumé #20 · record ahead of its play
Schedule so far #115
Margin ±5 pts (tightens with games)
Why 70? →

James Madison Dukes

Sun Belt · Harrisonburg, VA · Bridgeforth Stadium · Head coach Billy Napier
Rival
Building rivalry
5-2 all time (7 meetings since 2011)
James Madison leads
Last: won 46-20 (2026) · James Madison has won 5 straight
Holds it
program traits are earned from history
No recognized national titles since 1936. Counted: AP poll champion, a coaches-poll champion, or the BCS / playoff title-game winner; a split year counts for both.0national titles
Heisman Trophy winners0Heisman
Seasons finishing in the AP top 10 since 19360AP top-10
Consensus All-Americans since 19360All-Americans
NFL draft picks since 19670NFL picks
Winning percentage since 193682.5%win pct
History since 1936 · football since 2022. Every season →
Chemistry
Chem 61: new staff, still building61
Chem 36: warning zone
36Foundation
Chem 92: elite
92Gel
gel counts 45% so far
▲ Above its norm +15Trending up
early · #56 of 138
HC year1
Ret. starters14%
QB yrs w/ OC1
View chemistry →
Team chemistryearly · #56 of 138 FBS teams
Chem 36: warning zoneFoundation36+Chem 92: eliteGel92=Chem 61: typicalChem61Gel counts 45% so far (it grows as games are played, up to half)
Foundationwhat the program has built · moves over seasons
Foundation36Staff stability — Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnoverStaff stability20Roster continuity — Returning starters and the lineup's experienceRoster continuity30Unit cohesion — QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played togetherUnit cohesion62Administration — Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignmentAdministration56Investment — Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruitingInvestment53Fan base — How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matterFan base74
ContinuityClimate
Continuity · who has played and coached togetherlive

Who has played and coached together, and for how long, ranked against every FBS team at the same point of the season.

▸Staff stability
Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnover
20
Staff cohesion25
HC year 1 · OC year 1 · DC year 1
Assistant turnover14
100% of on-field staff new this season (FBS average about 45%)
▸Roster continuity
Returning starters and the lineup's experience
30
Returning core26
14% of last season's starters · FBS median 32%
Experience35
8 career starts per starter · FBS median 12
▸Unit cohesion
QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played together
62
QB & coordinator55
1st season together · same as 76% of FBS teams
QB & receivers60
3.8 games started together on average · FBS median 3.9
Line cohesion67
5.6 games per linemen pair · FBS median 5.2
Defensive cohesion70
5.1 games per defensive pair · FBS median 4.5
Climate · around the programlive

The administration, money and fans around the team: athletic director continuity, willingness to invest, and crowds.

▸Administration
Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignment
56
AD continuity56
Matt Roan · year 3 (Wikipedia, CC BY-SA)
▸Investment
Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruiting
53
Football's share38
25% of department spending goes to football
Investment trend71
+48% over three years
Football investment53
$16.9M on football (2024-25 federal report)
Recruiting spend49
$0.66M men's recruiting
Department resources58
$68M athletic department revenue
▸Fan base
How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matter
74
Crowds74
home crowds at 97% of capacity (2025)

Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures, as reported by each school. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA). Attendance: reported crowds vs stadium capacity.

Gelhow it is working right now · moves week to week
Gel92Playing above its parts — Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by gamePlaying above its parts86Settled & sharp — A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normalSettled & sharp84Alignment — Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one pageAlignmentsoonResilience — Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversityResiliencesoonFan & media mood — Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins laterFan & media mood99Coach security — The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new ADCoach security99
InternalOn-field fitExternal
Internal · how the program talkscoming

How the team talks in press conferences and interviews, each program against its own normal, so a naturally terse coach isn't read as upset. Being built program by program, Big Ten first.

▸Alignment
Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one page
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.
▸Resilience
Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversity
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.

Readings are team-level; we don't publish psychological readings of individual players.

On-field fit · how it is playing togetherlive

How the team is playing together this season: beating or missing its preseason expectation, a settled lineup, clean execution.

▸Playing above its parts
Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by game
86
This season86
+8.7 points a game vs its preseason projection (5 games)
▸Settled & sharp
A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normal
84
This season84
94% of starters kept game to game
External · pressure from outsidelive

Pressure from outside the building: the hard-facts hot seat now; this season's fan and media mood as it is measured.

▸Fan & media mood
Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins later
99
This season99
outside the AP poll: projected #81 preseason -> #46 in our Index now · beat rival Old Dominion 46-20 (+6) · beat rival Marshall 45-17 (+5) · results 6-0 (+15, recent games count more)
▸Coach security
The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new AD
99
This season99
Billy Napier, year 1 · 100% wins so far · +8.7 pts a game vs preseason expectation

Dashed gold ring = typical (62). 20-50 is the warning zone; under 10 is a collapse. Spokes with no data yet are dashed and left out until they fill in. Chem blends the two halves, then places the blend among this season's teams.

Trend · Foundationeach program year runs Feb 1 to the title game
'2248'2369'247'2559'262022 wk 2 vs Norfolk State: 43 · W2022 wk 4 vs App State: 44 · W2022 wk 5 vs Texas State: 46 · W2022 wk 6 vs Arkansas State: 46 · W2022 wk 7 vs Georgia Southern: 46 · L2022 wk 8 vs Marshall: 47 · L2022 wk 10 vs Louisville: 44 · L2022 wk 11 vs Old Dominion: 45 · W2022 wk 12 vs Georgia State: 46 · W2022 wk 13 vs Coastal Carolina: 48 · W2023 wk 2 vs Virginia: 70 · W2023 wk 3 vs Troy: 70 · W2023 wk 4 vs Utah State: 70 · W2023 wk 5 vs South Alabama: 68 · W2023 wk 7 vs Georgia Southern: 69 · W2023 wk 8 vs Marshall: 68 · W2023 wk 9 vs Old Dominion: 71 · W2023 wk 10 vs Georgia State: 72 · W2023 wk 11 vs UConn: 71 · W2023 wk 12 vs App State: 70 · L2023 wk 13 vs Coastal Carolina: 71 · W2023 wk 1 vs Air Force: 69 · L2024 wk 2 vs Gardner-Webb: 0 · W2024 wk 4 vs North Carolina: 9 · W2024 wk 5 vs Ball State: 9 · W2024 wk 6 vs UL Monroe: 8 · L2024 wk 7 vs Coastal Carolina: 8 · W2024 wk 8 vs Georgia Southern: 7 · L2024 wk 9 vs Southern Miss: 8 · W2024 wk 11 vs Georgia State: 11 · W2024 wk 12 vs Old Dominion: 10 · W2024 wk 13 vs App State: 9 · L2024 wk 14 vs Marshall: 10 · L2024 wk 1 vs Western Kentucky: 7 · W2025 wk 2 vs Louisville: 58 · L2025 wk 4 vs Liberty: 60 · W2025 wk 5 vs Georgia Southern: 59 · W2025 wk 6 vs Georgia State: 60 · W2025 wk 7 vs Louisiana: 61 · W2025 wk 8 vs Old Dominion: 60 · W2025 wk 10 vs Texas State: 61 · W2025 wk 11 vs Marshall: 62 · W2025 wk 12 vs App State: 62 · W2025 wk 13 vs Washington State: 62 · W2025 wk 14 vs Coastal Carolina: 62 · W2025 wk 15 vs Troy: 59 · W2025 wk 1 vs Oregon: 59 · L2026 wk 2 vs Wagner: 22 · W2026 wk 3 vs San Diego State: 22 · W2026 wk 4 vs Old Dominion: 25 · W2026 wk 5 vs Marshall: 33 · W2026 wk 6 vs Georgia Southern: 37 · W2026 wk 7 vs Georgia State: 36 · next gametypical 62

Every game since 2016, one continuous line; thin rules separate seasons and the chip is where each season finished. Navy dot = win, red = loss. Big drops usually mean a new staff, a new quarterback or a rebuilt line.

Trend · Gelthis season, after each game
typical 62wk 1 · on-field 68 · fan mood 54631wk 2 vs Wagner · W · on-field 71 · fan mood 70712wk 3 vs San Diego State · W · on-field 78 · fan mood 89823wk 4 vs Old Dominion · W · on-field 82 · fan mood 99894wk 5 vs Marshall · W · on-field 85 · fan mood 99905wk 6 vs Georgia Southern · W · on-field 84 · fan mood 99906

How the team is working right now, rebuilt after each game from only the games so far: on-field fit (results vs preseason expectation, lineup settling, execution) and that week's fan & media mood. Coach security is part of today's Gel number but isn't rebuilt week by week yet. Navy frame = win, red = loss.

Continuity facts
Head coach
Year 1
new this season
Offensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
Defensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
HC & OC together
1 seasons
working together
QB with his OC
1 seasons
same play-caller
QB & receivers
3.8 games
started together, average
Offensive line pairs
5.6 games
started together, average
Returning starters
14%
from last season
Starter experience
8 starts
career average
Internal facts
Pressers read
soon
this season, coaches and players
Coach tone
soon
vs his own normal
"We" vs "I"
soon
share of team language
Owning mistakes
soon
vs pointing outward
Same story
soon
coaches and players agree
After losses
soon
how fast tone recovers
Leaders named
soon
players teammates point to
Newcomers
soon
transfers talked about as part of it
Openness
soon
forthcoming vs guarded
Measured from press conferences and interviews, program by program.
Climate facts
Athletic director
Matt Roan
year 3
Football spending
$16.9M
2024-25 federal report
Spending trend
+48%
over three years
Department revenue
$68M
all sports
Recruiting spend
$0.66M
men's teams
Home crowds
—
of capacity
Staff turnover
100%
on-field staff new this season
Fan mood
soon
fans and local media
Coach & AD
soon
on the same page
Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Offense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Coleman
Pettaway
Wisloski
Scott
Harrison
Keller
Brown
Rawls
Bushong
Greenberg
Fox
QBCamden Coleman55415555545
RBGeorge Pettaway517516666656
WRBraeden Wisloski45615555555
WRMichael Scott11121111121
WRJeremiah Harrison56516666656
TECole Keller56516666656
OLTyler Brown56516666656
OLDeacon Rawls56516666656
OLEvan Bushong56516666656
OLZach Greenberg455255555195
OLDJ Fox56516666656

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Defense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Lovelace
Royster
Bush
Simpson
Jackson
Hooten
Willis
Flowe
Gathers
Kelly
Harvey
DLRasheed Lovelace61666666666
DLDanny Royster11111111111
DLKells Bush61666666666
DLKei'Trone Simpson61666666666
LBNakian Jackson61666666666
LBJT Hooten61666666666
DBKen Willis61666666666
DBKJ Flowe61666666666
DBSeth Gathers61666666666
DBDJ Kelly61666666666
DBJayon Harvey61666666666

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Chemistry is Scorebook's own rating of how well a program fits together, on the same all-time 0-99 scale as our other ratings (compared with every FBS team since 2016; 62 is typical, 20-50 signals something is wrong, and single digits are reserved for true collapses; each season is compared with its own era). This early version blends continuity (who has played and coached together, and for how long; it counts most) with the climate around the program; how the program talks joins as it is measured. Within continuity, quarterback-centered pairings count most because they held up when we tested them against results. How our ratings work →