Scorebook
Join
Teams / ACC / Georgia Tech
Index · this season
65
at its 5-year level▼ Down 7 this season
Career72since 1936
Peak901956
Last 566seasons
#67 nationally · 2-3 (1-1 conf)
Résumé #96 · better than its record
Schedule so far #70
Margin ±5 pts (tightens with games)
Why 65? →

Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets

ACC · Atlanta, GA · Bobby Dodd Stadium · Head coach Brent Key
Rival
Heated rivalry
40-69-5 all time (114 meetings since 1902)
Georgia leads
Last: lost 16-9 (2025) · Georgia has won 8 straight
Wants it back
program traits are earned from history
Recognized national titles: 1990 (shared). Counted: AP poll champion, a coaches-poll champion, or the BCS / playoff title-game winner; a split year counts for both. The school claims 4.1national titles
Heisman Trophy winners0Heisman
Seasons finishing in the AP top 10 since 193611AP top-10
Consensus All-Americans since 193616All-Americans
NFL draft picks since 196781NFL picks
Winning percentage since 193656.6%win pct
History since 1936 · football since 1902. Every season →
Chemistry
Chem 46: warning zone46
Chem 51: typical
51Foundation
Chem 38: warning zone
38Gel
gel counts 40% so far
▼ Below its norm -13Trending up
early · #115 of 138
HC year4
Ret. starters27%
QB yrs w/ OC1
View chemistry →
Team chemistryearly · #115 of 138 FBS teams
Chem 51: typicalFoundation51+Chem 38: warning zoneGel38=Chem 46: warning zoneChem46Gel counts 40% so far (it grows as games are played, up to half)
Foundationwhat the program has built · moves over seasons
Foundation51Staff stability — Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnoverStaff stability51Roster continuity — Returning starters and the lineup's experienceRoster continuity52Unit cohesion — QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played togetherUnit cohesion50Administration — Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignmentAdministration49Investment — Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruitingInvestment72Fan base — How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matterFan base60
ContinuityClimate
Continuity · who has played and coached togetherlive

Who has played and coached together, and for how long, ranked against every FBS team at the same point of the season.

▸Staff stability
Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnover
51
Staff cohesion53
HC year 4 · OC year 1 · DC year 1
Assistant turnover49
57% of on-field staff new this season (FBS average about 45%)
▸Roster continuity
Returning starters and the lineup's experience
52
Returning core53
27% of last season's starters · FBS median 32%
Experience52
10 career starts per starter · FBS median 12
▸Unit cohesion
QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played together
50
QB & coordinator55
1st season together · same as 76% of FBS teams
QB & receivers56
3.5 games started together on average · FBS median 3.9
Line cohesion32
3.1 games per linemen pair · FBS median 5.2
Defensive cohesion52
4.0 games per defensive pair · FBS median 4.5
Climate · around the programlive

The administration, money and fans around the team: athletic director continuity, willingness to invest, and crowds.

▸Administration
Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignment
49
AD continuity49
Ryan Alpert · year 2 (Wikipedia, CC BY-SA)
▸Investment
Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruiting
72
Football's share64
30% of department spending goes to football
Investment trend81
+63% over three years
Football investment70
$42.7M on football (2024-25 federal report)
Recruiting spend69
$2.05M men's recruiting
Department resources66
$140M athletic department revenue
▸Fan base
How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matter
60
Sellouts60
sellout crowds (95%+ of capacity) at 4 of 39 home games (last 8 seasons)
Sells out anyway61
sellout crowds at 3 of 28 games that didn't matter: cupcakes, or a team expected to lose or having a losing season

Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures, as reported by each school. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA). Attendance: reported crowds vs stadium capacity.

Gelhow it is working right now · moves week to week
Gel38Playing above its parts — Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by gamePlaying above its parts47Settled & sharp — A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normalSettled & sharp37Alignment — Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one pageAlignmentsoonResilience — Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversityResiliencesoonFan & media mood — Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins laterFan & media mood41Coach security — The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new ADCoach security33
InternalOn-field fitExternal
Internal · how the program talkscoming

How the team talks in press conferences and interviews, each program against its own normal, so a naturally terse coach isn't read as upset. Being built program by program, Big Ten first.

▸Alignment
Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one page
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.
▸Resilience
Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversity
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.

Readings are team-level; we don't publish psychological readings of individual players.

On-field fit · how it is playing togetherlive

How the team is playing together this season: beating or missing its preseason expectation, a settled lineup, clean execution.

▸Playing above its parts
Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by game
47
This season47
-4 points a game vs its preseason projection (4 games)
▸Settled & sharp
A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normal
37
This season37
78% of starters kept game to game
External · pressure from outsidelive

Pressure from outside the building: the hard-facts hot seat now; this season's fan and media mood as it is measured.

▸Fan & media mood
Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins later
41
This season41
outside the AP poll: projected #51 preseason -> #67 in our Index now · results 2-3 (-1, recent games count more)
▸Coach security
The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new AD
33
This season33
Brent Key, year 5 · 40% wins so far · -4.0 pts a game vs preseason expectation · last two seasons +16% vs the program's norm

Dashed gold ring = typical (62). 20-50 is the warning zone; under 10 is a collapse. Spokes with no data yet are dashed and left out until they fill in. Chem blends the two halves, then places the blend among this season's teams.

Trend · Foundationeach program year runs Feb 1 to the title game
'1674'1767'1865'1944'2064'2158'2248'2346'2463'2564'262016 wk 1 vs Boston College: 75 · W2016 wk 2 vs Mercer: 87 · W2016 wk 3 vs Vanderbilt: 70 · W2016 wk 4 vs Clemson: 76 · L2016 wk 5 vs Miami: 80 · L2016 wk 6 vs Pittsburgh: 77 · L2016 wk 7 vs Georgia Southern: 75 · W2016 wk 9 vs Duke: 71 · W2016 wk 10 vs North Carolina: 73 · L2016 wk 11 vs Virginia Tech: 77 · W2016 wk 12 vs Virginia: 60 · W2016 wk 13 vs Georgia: 76 · W2016 wk 1 vs Kentucky: 74 · W2017 wk 2 vs Jacksonville State: 62 · W2017 wk 4 vs Pittsburgh: 64 · W2017 wk 5 vs North Carolina: 64 · W2017 wk 7 vs Miami: 66 · L2017 wk 8 vs Wake Forest: 66 · W2017 wk 9 vs Clemson: 64 · L2017 wk 10 vs Virginia: 67 · L2017 wk 11 vs Virginia Tech: 63 · W2017 wk 12 vs Duke: 65 · L2017 wk 13 vs Georgia: 67 · L2018 wk 2 vs South Florida: 65 · L2018 wk 3 vs Pittsburgh: 71 · L2018 wk 4 vs Clemson: 69 · L2018 wk 5 vs Bowling Green: 65 · W2018 wk 6 vs Louisville: 69 · W2018 wk 7 vs Duke: 70 · L2018 wk 9 vs Virginia Tech: 61 · W2018 wk 10 vs North Carolina: 56 · W2018 wk 11 vs Miami: 65 · W2018 wk 12 vs Virginia: 66 · W2018 wk 13 vs Georgia: 67 · L2018 wk 1 vs Minnesota: 65 · L2019 wk 2 vs South Florida: 41 · W2019 wk 3 vs The Citadel: 42 · L2019 wk 5 vs Temple: 42 · L2019 wk 6 vs North Carolina: 47 · L2019 wk 7 vs Duke: 47 · L2019 wk 8 vs Miami: 46 · W2019 wk 10 vs Pittsburgh: 39 · L2019 wk 11 vs Virginia: 38 · L2019 wk 12 vs Virginia Tech: 38 · L2019 wk 13 vs NC State: 43 · W2019 wk 14 vs Georgia: 44 · L2020 wk 3 vs UCF: 65 · L2020 wk 4 vs Syracuse: 64 · L2020 wk 6 vs Louisville: 63 · W2020 wk 7 vs Clemson: 66 · L2020 wk 8 vs Boston College: 65 · L2020 wk 9 vs Notre Dame: 63 · L2020 wk 13 vs Duke: 65 · W2020 wk 14 vs NC State: 64 · L2020 wk 15 vs Pittsburgh: 64 · L2021 wk 2 vs Kennesaw State: 61 · W2021 wk 3 vs Clemson: 63 · L2021 wk 4 vs North Carolina: 61 · W2021 wk 5 vs Pittsburgh: 60 · L2021 wk 6 vs Duke: 62 · W2021 wk 8 vs Virginia: 64 · L2021 wk 9 vs Virginia Tech: 63 · L2021 wk 10 vs Miami: 57 · L2021 wk 11 vs Boston College: 61 · L2021 wk 12 vs Notre Dame: 60 · L2021 wk 13 vs Georgia: 58 · L2022 wk 2 vs Western Carolina: 35 · W2022 wk 3 vs Ole Miss: 36 · L2022 wk 4 vs UCF: 50 · L2022 wk 5 vs Pittsburgh: 40 · W2022 wk 6 vs Duke: 48 · W2022 wk 8 vs Virginia: 47 · L2022 wk 9 vs Florida State: 42 · L2022 wk 10 vs Virginia Tech: 48 · W2022 wk 11 vs Miami: 39 · L2022 wk 12 vs North Carolina: 40 · W2022 wk 13 vs Georgia: 48 · L2023 wk 2 vs South Carolina State: 48 · W2023 wk 3 vs Ole Miss: 42 · L2023 wk 4 vs Wake Forest: 49 · W2023 wk 5 vs Bowling Green: 49 · L2023 wk 6 vs Miami: 48 · W2023 wk 8 vs Boston College: 41 · L2023 wk 9 vs North Carolina: 48 · W2023 wk 10 vs Virginia: 48 · W2023 wk 11 vs Clemson: 44 · L2023 wk 12 vs Syracuse: 43 · W2023 wk 13 vs Georgia: 48 · L2023 wk 1 vs UCF: 46 · W2024 wk 1 vs Georgia State: 64 · W2024 wk 2 vs Syracuse: 64 · L2024 wk 3 vs VMI: 65 · W2024 wk 4 vs Louisville: 63 · L2024 wk 6 vs Duke: 64 · W2024 wk 7 vs North Carolina: 62 · W2024 wk 8 vs Notre Dame: 65 · L2024 wk 9 vs Virginia Tech: 57 · L2024 wk 11 vs Miami: 58 · W2024 wk 13 vs NC State: 62 · W2024 wk 14 vs Georgia: 65 · L2024 wk 1 vs Vanderbilt: 63 · L2025 wk 2 vs Gardner-Webb: 67 · W2025 wk 3 vs Clemson: 55 · W2025 wk 4 vs Temple: 67 · W2025 wk 5 vs Wake Forest: 67 · W2025 wk 7 vs Virginia Tech: 66 · W2025 wk 8 vs Duke: 67 · W2025 wk 9 vs Syracuse: 66 · W2025 wk 10 vs NC State: 63 · L2025 wk 12 vs Boston College: 63 · W2025 wk 13 vs Pittsburgh: 64 · L2025 wk 14 vs Georgia: 66 · L2025 wk 1 vs BYU: 64 · L2026 wk 2 vs Tennessee: 46 · L2026 wk 3 vs Mercer: 47 · W2026 wk 4 vs Stanford: 51 · L2026 wk 6 vs Duke: 50 · W2026 wk 7 vs Virginia Tech: 52 · next gametypical 62

Every game since 2016, one continuous line; thin rules separate seasons and the chip is where each season finished. Navy dot = win, red = loss. Big drops usually mean a new staff, a new quarterback or a rebuilt line.

Trend · Gelthis season, after each game
typical 62wk 1 · on-field 50 · fan mood 43471wk 2 vs Tennessee · L · on-field 61 · fan mood 34512wk 3 vs Mercer · W · on-field 53 · fan mood 35473wk 4 vs Stanford · L · on-field 40 · fan mood 32374wk 6 vs Duke · W · on-field 39 · fan mood 32366

How the team is working right now, rebuilt after each game from only the games so far: on-field fit (results vs preseason expectation, lineup settling, execution) and that week's fan & media mood. Coach security is part of today's Gel number but isn't rebuilt week by week yet. Navy frame = win, red = loss.

Continuity facts
Head coach
Year 4
at this school
Offensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
Defensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
HC & OC together
1 seasons
working together
QB with his OC
1 seasons
same play-caller
QB & receivers
3.5 games
started together, average
Offensive line pairs
3.1 games
started together, average
Returning starters
27%
from last season
Starter experience
10 starts
career average
Internal facts
Pressers read
soon
this season, coaches and players
Coach tone
soon
vs his own normal
"We" vs "I"
soon
share of team language
Owning mistakes
soon
vs pointing outward
Same story
soon
coaches and players agree
After losses
soon
how fast tone recovers
Leaders named
soon
players teammates point to
Newcomers
soon
transfers talked about as part of it
Openness
soon
forthcoming vs guarded
Measured from press conferences and interviews, program by program.
Climate facts
Athletic director
Ryan Alpert
year 2
Football spending
$42.7M
2024-25 federal report
Spending trend
+63%
over three years
Department revenue
$140M
all sports
Recruiting spend
$2.05M
men's teams
Home crowds
—
of capacity
Staff turnover
57%
on-field staff new this season
Fan mood
soon
fans and local media
Coach & AD
soon
on the same page
Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Offense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Mendoza
Haynes
Smith
Allen
Penson
Corbo
Carney
Riggs
Ionata
Floyd
Peay
QBAlberto Mendoza55255253435
RBJustice Haynes55255253435
WRRahkeem Smith22222221122
WRJordan Allen55265263435
WRDalen Penson55255253435
TEChris Corbo22222221122
OLMalachi Carney552652183435
OLJameson Riggs33133133313
OLJoseph Ionata44144143424
OLJordan Floyd33233231233
OLKevin Peay Jr.55255253435

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Defense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Thomas
McCoy
Carroll-Jackson
Bradford
Lightsey
Efford
Spaulding
Riley
Tobe
Mbakwe
Harris
DLTawfiq Thomas55515334335
DLTaje McCoy55515334335
DLVincent Carroll-Jackson55515334335
DLAmontrae Bradford11188821711
LBE.J. Lightsey55582016441535
LBKyle Efford33381633231333
LBCayman Spaulding33324242413
DBSavion Riley44414324234
DBZachary Tobe33371513421513
DBJaylen Mbakwe33313313133
DBTae Harris55515334335

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Chemistry is Scorebook's own rating of how well a program fits together, on the same all-time 0-99 scale as our other ratings (compared with every FBS team since 2016; 62 is typical, 20-50 signals something is wrong, and single digits are reserved for true collapses; each season is compared with its own era). This early version blends continuity (who has played and coached together, and for how long; it counts most) with the climate around the program; how the program talks joins as it is measured. Within continuity, quarterback-centered pairings count most because they held up when we tested them against results. How our ratings work →