Scorebook
Join
Teams / American Athletic / Florida Atlantic
Index · this season
60
▲ Above its 5-year level +6▲ Up 3 this season
Career52since 1936
Peak742017
Last 554seasons
#85 nationally · 4-1 (1-0 conf)
Résumé #41 · record ahead of its play
Schedule so far #111
Margin ±5 pts (tightens with games)
Why 60? →

Florida Atlantic Owls

American Athletic · Boca Raton, FL · FAU Stadium · Head coach Zach Kittley
Rival
Building rivalry
17-6 all time (23 meetings since 2003)
Florida Atlantic leads
Last: won 16-10 (2026)
Holds it
program traits are earned from history
No recognized national titles since 1936. Counted: AP poll champion, a coaches-poll champion, or the BCS / playoff title-game winner; a split year counts for both.0national titles
Heisman Trophy winners0Heisman
Seasons finishing in the AP top 10 since 19360AP top-10
Consensus All-Americans since 19361All-Americans
NFL draft picks since 196710NFL picks
Winning percentage since 193643.5%win pct
History since 1936 · football since 2004. Every season →
Chemistry
Chem 69: typical69
Chem 66: typical
66Foundation
Chem 74: strong
74Gel
gel counts 40% so far
▲ Above its norm +19
early · #15 of 138
HC year2
Ret. starters46%
QB yrs w/ OC—
View chemistry →
Team chemistryearly · #15 of 138 FBS teams
Chem 66: typicalFoundation66+Chem 74: strongGel74=Chem 69: typicalChem69Gel counts 40% so far (it grows as games are played, up to half)
Foundationwhat the program has built · moves over seasons
Foundation66Staff stability — Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnoverStaff stability75Roster continuity — Returning starters and the lineup's experienceRoster continuity72Unit cohesion — QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played togetherUnit cohesion75Administration — Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignmentAdministration30Investment — Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruitingInvestment70Fan base — How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matterFan base56
ContinuityClimate
Continuity · who has played and coached togetherlive

Who has played and coached together, and for how long, ranked against every FBS team at the same point of the season.

▸Staff stability
Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnover
75
Staff cohesion—
Assistant turnover75
22% of on-field staff new this season (FBS average about 45%)
▸Roster continuity
Returning starters and the lineup's experience
72
Returning core74
45% of last season's starters · FBS median 32%
Experience70
13 career starts per starter · FBS median 12
▸Unit cohesion
QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played together
75
QB & coordinator—
QB & receivers93
10.2 games started together on average · FBS median 3.9
Line cohesion67
5.6 games per linemen pair · FBS median 5.2
Defensive cohesion56
4.2 games per defensive pair · FBS median 4.5
Climate · around the programlive

The administration, money and fans around the team: athletic director continuity, willingness to invest, and crowds.

▸Administration
Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignment
30
AD continuity30
Josh McCowan · year 1 (Wikipedia, CC BY-SA)
▸Investment
Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruiting
70
Football's share87
39% of department spending goes to football
Investment trend70
+48% over three years
Football investment55
$19.3M on football (2024-25 federal report)
Recruiting spend46
$0.60M men's recruiting
Department resources49
$49M athletic department revenue
▸Fan base
How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matter
56
Sellouts55
sellout crowds (95%+ of capacity) at 3 of 41 home games (last 8 seasons)
Sells out anyway58
sellout crowds at 3 of 33 games that didn't matter: cupcakes, or a team expected to lose or having a losing season

Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures, as reported by each school. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA). Attendance: reported crowds vs stadium capacity.

Gelhow it is working right now · moves week to week
Gel74Playing above its parts — Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by gamePlaying above its parts62Settled & sharp — A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normalSettled & sharp71Alignment — Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one pageAlignmentsoonResilience — Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversityResiliencesoonFan & media mood — Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins laterFan & media mood81Coach security — The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new ADCoach security73
InternalOn-field fitExternal
Internal · how the program talkscoming

How the team talks in press conferences and interviews, each program against its own normal, so a naturally terse coach isn't read as upset. Being built program by program, Big Ten first.

▸Alignment
Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one page
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.
▸Resilience
Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversity
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.

Readings are team-level; we don't publish psychological readings of individual players.

On-field fit · how it is playing togetherlive

How the team is playing together this season: beating or missing its preseason expectation, a settled lineup, clean execution.

▸Playing above its parts
Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by game
62
This season62
+0.1 points a game vs its preseason projection (4 games)
▸Settled & sharp
A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normal
71
This season71
82% of starters kept game to game
External · pressure from outsidelive

Pressure from outside the building: the hard-facts hot seat now; this season's fan and media mood as it is measured.

▸Fan & media mood
Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins later
81
This season81
outside the AP poll: projected #90 preseason -> #85 in our Index now · beat rival Florida International 16-10 (+6) · results 4-1 (+12, recent games count more)
▸Coach security
The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new AD
73
This season73
Zach Kittley, year 2 · 80% wins so far · +0.1 pts a game vs preseason expectation · last two seasons -12% vs the program's norm · new athletic director

Dashed gold ring = typical (62). 20-50 is the warning zone; under 10 is a collapse. Spokes with no data yet are dashed and left out until they fill in. Chem blends the two halves, then places the blend among this season's teams.

Trend · Foundationeach program year runs Feb 1 to the title game
'1667'1743'1854'1959'2031'2157'2252'2351'2456'2535'262016 wk 1 vs Southern Illinois: 58 · W2016 wk 2 vs Miami: 73 · L2016 wk 3 vs Kansas State: 62 · L2016 wk 4 vs Ball State: 64 · L2016 wk 5 vs Florida International: 68 · L2016 wk 6 vs Charlotte: 63 · L2016 wk 7 vs Marshall: 67 · L2016 wk 9 vs Western Kentucky: 69 · L2016 wk 10 vs Rice: 64 · W2016 wk 11 vs UTEP: 55 · W2016 wk 12 vs Old Dominion: 64 · L2016 wk 13 vs Middle Tennessee: 67 · L2017 wk 2 vs Wisconsin: 38 · L2017 wk 3 vs Bethune-Cookman: 50 · W2017 wk 4 vs Buffalo: 51 · L2017 wk 5 vs Middle Tennessee: 50 · W2017 wk 6 vs Old Dominion: 50 · W2017 wk 8 vs North Texas: 51 · W2017 wk 9 vs Western Kentucky: 50 · W2017 wk 10 vs Marshall: 52 · W2017 wk 11 vs Louisiana Tech: 52 · W2017 wk 12 vs Florida International: 53 · W2017 wk 13 vs Charlotte: 53 · W2017 wk 14 vs North Texas: 51 · W2017 wk 1 vs Akron: 43 · W2018 wk 2 vs Air Force: 43 · W2018 wk 3 vs Bethune-Cookman: 46 · W2018 wk 4 vs UCF: 52 · L2018 wk 5 vs Middle Tennessee: 52 · L2018 wk 6 vs Old Dominion: 51 · W2018 wk 8 vs Marshall: 54 · L2018 wk 9 vs Louisiana Tech: 52 · L2018 wk 10 vs Florida International: 43 · W2018 wk 11 vs Western Kentucky: 53 · W2018 wk 12 vs North Texas: 54 · L2018 wk 13 vs Charlotte: 54 · L2019 wk 2 vs UCF: 62 · L2019 wk 3 vs Ball State: 62 · W2019 wk 4 vs Wagner: 62 · W2019 wk 5 vs Charlotte: 63 · W2019 wk 7 vs Middle Tennessee: 61 · W2019 wk 8 vs Marshall: 62 · L2019 wk 9 vs Old Dominion: 61 · W2019 wk 10 vs Western Kentucky: 63 · W2019 wk 11 vs Florida International: 63 · W2019 wk 13 vs UTSA: 63 · W2019 wk 14 vs Southern Miss: 63 · W2019 wk 15 vs UAB: 62 · W2019 wk 1 vs SMU: 59 · W2020 wk 8 vs Marshall: 19 · L2020 wk 9 vs UTSA: 17 · W2020 wk 10 vs Western Kentucky: 33 · W2020 wk 11 vs Florida International: 33 · W2020 wk 12 vs Massachusetts: 20 · W2020 wk 14 vs Georgia Southern: 23 · L2020 wk 15 vs Southern Miss: 33 · L2020 wk 1 vs Memphis: 31 · L2021 wk 2 vs Georgia Southern: 57 · W2021 wk 3 vs Fordham: 57 · W2021 wk 4 vs Air Force: 57 · L2021 wk 5 vs Florida International: 58 · W2021 wk 6 vs UAB: 58 · L2021 wk 8 vs Charlotte: 59 · W2021 wk 9 vs UTEP: 58 · W2021 wk 10 vs Marshall: 59 · L2021 wk 11 vs Old Dominion: 59 · L2021 wk 12 vs Western Kentucky: 59 · L2021 wk 13 vs Middle Tennessee: 57 · L2022 wk 1 vs Ohio: 53 · L2022 wk 2 vs SE Louisiana: 49 · W2022 wk 3 vs UCF: 48 · L2022 wk 4 vs Purdue: 49 · L2022 wk 5 vs North Texas: 51 · L2022 wk 7 vs Rice: 52 · W2022 wk 8 vs UTEP: 52 · L2022 wk 9 vs UAB: 53 · W2022 wk 11 vs Florida International: 51 · W2022 wk 12 vs Middle Tennessee: 53 · L2022 wk 13 vs Western Kentucky: 52 · L2023 wk 2 vs Ohio: 50 · L2023 wk 3 vs Clemson: 50 · L2023 wk 4 vs Illinois: 51 · L2023 wk 6 vs Tulsa: 48 · W2023 wk 7 vs South Florida: 49 · W2023 wk 8 vs UTSA: 48 · L2023 wk 9 vs Charlotte: 49 · W2023 wk 10 vs UAB: 50 · L2023 wk 11 vs East Carolina: 51 · L2023 wk 12 vs Tulane: 50 · L2023 wk 13 vs Rice: 51 · L2024 wk 2 vs Army: 60 · L2024 wk 3 vs Florida International: 61 · W2024 wk 4 vs UConn: 60 · L2024 wk 5 vs Wagner: 58 · W2024 wk 7 vs North Texas: 59 · L2024 wk 8 vs UTSA: 61 · L2024 wk 10 vs South Florida: 62 · L2024 wk 11 vs East Carolina: 61 · L2024 wk 12 vs Temple: 58 · L2024 wk 13 vs Charlotte: 54 · L2024 wk 14 vs Tulsa: 56 · W2025 wk 2 vs Florida A&M: 32 · W2025 wk 3 vs Florida International: 32 · L2025 wk 5 vs Memphis: 32 · L2025 wk 6 vs Rice: 33 · W2025 wk 7 vs UAB: 35 · W2025 wk 8 vs South Florida: 31 · L2025 wk 9 vs Navy: 28 · L2025 wk 11 vs Tulsa: 32 · W2025 wk 12 vs Tulane: 32 · L2025 wk 13 vs UConn: 34 · L2025 wk 14 vs East Carolina: 35 · L2026 wk 2 vs Navy: 65 · W2026 wk 3 vs Florida International: 66 · W2026 wk 4 vs UL Monroe: 65 · W2026 wk 5 vs Texas Southern: 66 · W2026 wk 7 vs Army: 67 · next gametypical 62

Every game since 2016, one continuous line; thin rules separate seasons and the chip is where each season finished. Navy dot = win, red = loss. Big drops usually mean a new staff, a new quarterback or a rebuilt line.

Trend · Gelthis season, after each game
typical 62wk 1 · on-field 30 · fan mood 32311wk 2 vs Navy · W · on-field 46 · fan mood 51482wk 3 vs Florida International · W · on-field 45 · fan mood 66533wk 4 vs UL Monroe · W · on-field 62 · fan mood 76674wk 5 vs Texas Southern · W · on-field 69 · fan mood 79735

How the team is working right now, rebuilt after each game from only the games so far: on-field fit (results vs preseason expectation, lineup settling, execution) and that week's fan & media mood. Coach security is part of today's Gel number but isn't rebuilt week by week yet. Navy frame = win, red = loss.

Continuity facts
Head coach
Year 2
at this school
Offensive coordinator
Year —
at this school
Defensive coordinator
Year 2
at this school
HC & OC together
— seasons
working together
QB with his OC
— seasons
same play-caller
QB & receivers
10.3 games
started together, average
Offensive line pairs
5.6 games
started together, average
Returning starters
45%
from last season
Starter experience
13 starts
career average
Internal facts
Pressers read
soon
this season, coaches and players
Coach tone
soon
vs his own normal
"We" vs "I"
soon
share of team language
Owning mistakes
soon
vs pointing outward
Same story
soon
coaches and players agree
After losses
soon
how fast tone recovers
Leaders named
soon
players teammates point to
Newcomers
soon
transfers talked about as part of it
Openness
soon
forthcoming vs guarded
Measured from press conferences and interviews, program by program.
Climate facts
Athletic director
Josh McCowan
year 1
Football spending
$19.3M
2024-25 federal report
Spending trend
+48%
over three years
Department revenue
$49M
all sports
Recruiting spend
$0.60M
men's teams
Home crowds
—
of capacity
Staff turnover
22%
on-field staff new this season
Fan mood
soon
fans and local media
Coach & AD
soon
on the same page
Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Offense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Veltkamp
Ervin
Messer
Henry
Valsin
Johnson
Fiacable
Nonar
Galloway
Cunningham
Jones
QBCaden Veltkamp1621615551615554
RBEthan Ervin22222222221
WREaston Messer1621615551615554
WRDominique Henry1521520441514443
WRKelby Valsin52545555554
TEAJ Johnson52545555554
OLVincent Fiacable1621615551615554
OLJa'Kavion Nonar1521514551515554
OLBen Galloway52545555554
OLBraden Cunningham52545555554
OLAiden Jones41434444444

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Defense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Doggette
Burris
Hart
Sipp
Tooley
McGhee
Sweeney
Bax
Simpson-Nealy
Roberts
Jackson
DLCJ Doggette Jr.16415511975344
DLBlake Burris44443424313
LBLeon Hart Jr.15415511975334
LBJoseph Sipp Jr.54554435324
DBChris Tooley III11311441754334
DBDamarius McGhee94947964313
DBJayden Sweeney72735673122
DBJonathan Bax54554435324
DBBo Simpson-Nealy33333313313
DBJosh Roberts41323122142
DBTravis Jackson43444324324

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Chemistry is Scorebook's own rating of how well a program fits together, on the same all-time 0-99 scale as our other ratings (compared with every FBS team since 2016; 62 is typical, 20-50 signals something is wrong, and single digits are reserved for true collapses; each season is compared with its own era). This early version blends continuity (who has played and coached together, and for how long; it counts most) with the climate around the program; how the program talks joins as it is measured. Within continuity, quarterback-centered pairings count most because they held up when we tested them against results. How our ratings work →