Scorebook
Join
Teams / Mid-American / Central Michigan
Index · this season
52
at its 5-year level
Career55since 1936
Peak711979
Last 553seasons
#120 nationally · 3-3 (1-1 conf)
Résumé #96 · record ahead of its play
Schedule so far #84
Margin ±5 pts (tightens with games)
Why 52? →

Central Michigan Chippewas

Mid-American · Mount Pleasant, MI · Kelly/Shorts Stadium · Head coach Matt Drinkall
Rival
Established rivalry
18-31-3 all time (52 meetings since 1973)
Toledo leads
Last: lost 21-3 (2025) · Toledo has won 4 straight
Wants it back
program traits are earned from history
No recognized national titles since 1936. Counted: AP poll champion, a coaches-poll champion, or the BCS / playoff title-game winner; a split year counts for both.0national titles
Heisman Trophy winners0Heisman
Seasons finishing in the AP top 10 since 19360AP top-10
Consensus All-Americans since 19360All-Americans
NFL draft picks since 196721NFL picks
Winning percentage since 193653.7%win pct
History since 1936 · football since 1975. Every season →
Chemistry
Chem 59: typical59
Chem 57: typical
57Foundation
Chem 62: typical
62Gel
gel counts 45% so far
▲ Above its norm +8
early · #63 of 138
HC year2
Ret. starters41%
QB yrs w/ OC1
View chemistry →
Team chemistryearly · #63 of 138 FBS teams
Chem 57: typicalFoundation57+Chem 62: typicalGel62=Chem 59: typicalChem59Gel counts 45% so far (it grows as games are played, up to half)
Foundationwhat the program has built · moves over seasons
Foundation57Staff stability — Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnoverStaff stability66Roster continuity — Returning starters and the lineup's experienceRoster continuity58Unit cohesion — QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played togetherUnit cohesion65Administration — Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignmentAdministration69Investment — Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruitingInvestment46Fan base — How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matterFan base32
ContinuityClimate
Continuity · who has played and coached togetherlive

Who has played and coached together, and for how long, ranked against every FBS team at the same point of the season.

▸Staff stability
Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnover
66
Staff cohesion59
HC year 2 · OC year 2 · DC year 2
Assistant turnover74
23% of on-field staff new this season (FBS average about 45%)
▸Roster continuity
Returning starters and the lineup's experience
58
Returning core69
41% of last season's starters · FBS median 32%
Experience48
9 career starts per starter · FBS median 12
▸Unit cohesion
QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played together
65
QB & coordinator55
1st season together · same as 76% of FBS teams
QB & receivers64
4.0 games started together on average · FBS median 3.9
Line cohesion76
7.7 games per linemen pair · FBS median 5.2
Defensive cohesion71
5.1 games per defensive pair · FBS median 4.5
Climate · around the programlive

The administration, money and fans around the team: athletic director continuity, willingness to invest, and crowds.

▸Administration
Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignment
69
AD continuity69
Amy Folan · year 6 (Wikipedia, CC BY-SA)
▸Investment
Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruiting
46
Football's share62
30% of department spending goes to football
Investment trend40
+10% over three years
Football investment40
$11.6M on football (2024-25 federal report)
Recruiting spend26
$0.40M men's recruiting
Department resources37
$39M athletic department revenue
▸Fan base
How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matter
32
Sellouts30
sellout crowds (95%+ of capacity) at 0 of 37 home games (last 8 seasons)
Sells out anyway34
sellout crowds at 0 of 27 games that didn't matter: cupcakes, or a team expected to lose or having a losing season

Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures, as reported by each school. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA). Attendance: reported crowds vs stadium capacity.

Gelhow it is working right now · moves week to week
Gel62Playing above its parts — Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by gamePlaying above its parts57Settled & sharp — A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normalSettled & sharp65Alignment — Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one pageAlignmentsoonResilience — Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversityResiliencesoonFan & media mood — Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins laterFan & media mood57Coach security — The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new ADCoach security66
InternalOn-field fitExternal
Internal · how the program talkscoming

How the team talks in press conferences and interviews, each program against its own normal, so a naturally terse coach isn't read as upset. Being built program by program, Big Ten first.

▸Alignment
Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one page
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.
▸Resilience
Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversity
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.

Readings are team-level; we don't publish psychological readings of individual players.

On-field fit · how it is playing togetherlive

How the team is playing together this season: beating or missing its preseason expectation, a settled lineup, clean execution.

▸Playing above its parts
Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by game
57
This season57
-1.1 points a game vs its preseason projection (5 games)
▸Settled & sharp
A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normal
65
This season65
84% of starters kept game to game
External · pressure from outsidelive

Pressure from outside the building: the hard-facts hot seat now; this season's fan and media mood as it is measured.

▸Fan & media mood
Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins later
57
This season57
outside the AP poll: projected #117 preseason -> #120 in our Index now · results 3-3 (-0, recent games count more)
▸Coach security
The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new AD
66
This season66
Matt Drinkall, year 2 · 50% wins so far · -1.1 pts a game vs preseason expectation · last two seasons +6% vs the program's norm

Dashed gold ring = typical (62). 20-50 is the warning zone; under 10 is a collapse. Spokes with no data yet are dashed and left out until they fill in. Chem blends the two halves, then places the blend among this season's teams.

Trend · Foundationeach program year runs Feb 1 to the title game
'1661'1751'1844'1928'2056'2157'2254'2359'2456'2540'262016 wk 1 vs Presbyterian: 54 · W2016 wk 2 vs Oklahoma State: 72 · W2016 wk 3 vs UNLV: 68 · W2016 wk 4 vs Virginia: 62 · L2016 wk 5 vs Western Michigan: 63 · L2016 wk 6 vs Ball State: 60 · W2016 wk 7 vs Northern Illinois: 64 · W2016 wk 8 vs Toledo: 62 · L2016 wk 9 vs Kent State: 63 · L2016 wk 10 vs Miami (OH): 64 · L2016 wk 12 vs Ohio: 65 · W2016 wk 13 vs Eastern Michigan: 64 · L2016 wk 1 vs Tulsa: 61 · L2017 wk 2 vs Kansas: 49 · W2017 wk 3 vs Syracuse: 48 · L2017 wk 4 vs Miami (OH): 52 · L2017 wk 5 vs Boston College: 52 · L2017 wk 6 vs Ohio: 54 · W2017 wk 7 vs Toledo: 52 · L2017 wk 8 vs Ball State: 54 · W2017 wk 10 vs Western Michigan: 54 · W2017 wk 11 vs Eastern Michigan: 53 · W2017 wk 12 vs Kent State: 51 · W2017 wk 13 vs Northern Illinois: 52 · W2017 wk 1 vs Wyoming: 51 · L2018 wk 2 vs Kansas: 46 · L2018 wk 3 vs Northern Illinois: 45 · L2018 wk 4 vs Maine: 48 · W2018 wk 5 vs Michigan State: 45 · L2018 wk 6 vs Buffalo: 47 · L2018 wk 7 vs Ball State: 47 · L2018 wk 8 vs Western Michigan: 49 · L2018 wk 9 vs Akron: 46 · L2018 wk 10 vs Eastern Michigan: 42 · L2018 wk 11 vs Bowling Green: 46 · L2018 wk 13 vs Toledo: 44 · L2019 wk 2 vs Wisconsin: 22 · L2019 wk 3 vs Akron: 32 · W2019 wk 4 vs Miami: 21 · L2019 wk 5 vs Western Michigan: 24 · L2019 wk 6 vs Eastern Michigan: 35 · W2019 wk 7 vs New Mexico State: 36 · W2019 wk 8 vs Bowling Green: 25 · W2019 wk 9 vs Buffalo: 36 · L2019 wk 10 vs Northern Illinois: 36 · W2019 wk 12 vs Ball State: 36 · W2019 wk 14 vs Toledo: 36 · W2019 wk 15 vs Miami (OH): 31 · L2019 wk 1 vs San Diego State: 28 · L2020 wk 11 vs Northern Illinois: 57 · W2020 wk 12 vs Western Michigan: 57 · L2020 wk 13 vs Eastern Michigan: 56 · W2020 wk 14 vs Ball State: 58 · L2020 wk 15 vs Toledo: 56 · L2021 wk 2 vs Robert Morris: 58 · W2021 wk 3 vs LSU: 57 · L2021 wk 4 vs Florida International: 59 · W2021 wk 5 vs Miami (OH): 60 · L2021 wk 6 vs Ohio: 59 · W2021 wk 7 vs Toledo: 58 · W2021 wk 8 vs Northern Illinois: 56 · L2021 wk 10 vs Western Michigan: 58 · W2021 wk 11 vs Kent State: 57 · W2021 wk 12 vs Ball State: 58 · W2021 wk 13 vs Eastern Michigan: 60 · W2021 wk 1 vs Washington State: 57 · W2022 wk 2 vs South Alabama: 54 · L2022 wk 3 vs Bucknell: 55 · W2022 wk 4 vs Penn State: 52 · L2022 wk 5 vs Toledo: 52 · L2022 wk 6 vs Ball State: 53 · L2022 wk 7 vs Akron: 54 · W2022 wk 8 vs Bowling Green: 55 · L2022 wk 10 vs Northern Illinois: 55 · W2022 wk 11 vs Buffalo: 56 · W2022 wk 12 vs Western Michigan: 54 · L2022 wk 13 vs Eastern Michigan: 54 · L2023 wk 2 vs New Hampshire: 58 · W2023 wk 3 vs Notre Dame: 58 · L2023 wk 4 vs South Alabama: 56 · W2023 wk 5 vs Eastern Michigan: 59 · W2023 wk 6 vs Buffalo: 54 · L2023 wk 7 vs Akron: 56 · W2023 wk 8 vs Ball State: 55 · L2023 wk 10 vs Northern Illinois: 57 · W2023 wk 11 vs Western Michigan: 56 · L2023 wk 12 vs Ohio: 58 · L2023 wk 13 vs Toledo: 59 · L2024 wk 2 vs Florida International: 58 · L2024 wk 3 vs Illinois: 58 · L2024 wk 4 vs Ball State: 59 · W2024 wk 5 vs San Diego State: 59 · W2024 wk 7 vs Ohio: 58 · L2024 wk 8 vs Eastern Michigan: 61 · L2024 wk 9 vs Miami (OH): 60 · L2024 wk 11 vs Bowling Green: 55 · L2024 wk 12 vs Toledo: 57 · L2024 wk 13 vs Western Michigan: 56 · W2024 wk 14 vs Northern Illinois: 56 · L2025 wk 2 vs Pittsburgh: 39 · L2025 wk 3 vs Michigan: 39 · L2025 wk 4 vs Wagner: 38 · W2025 wk 5 vs Eastern Michigan: 37 · W2025 wk 6 vs Akron: 40 · L2025 wk 8 vs Bowling Green: 40 · W2025 wk 9 vs Massachusetts: 39 · W2025 wk 10 vs Western Michigan: 41 · L2025 wk 12 vs Buffalo: 41 · W2025 wk 13 vs Kent State: 41 · W2025 wk 14 vs Toledo: 42 · L2025 wk 1 vs Northwestern: 40 · L2026 wk 2 vs Colgate: 54 · W2026 wk 3 vs Wyoming: 52 · W2026 wk 4 vs Miami: 55 · L2026 wk 5 vs Akron: 54 · W2026 wk 6 vs Ohio: 54 · L2026 wk 7 vs Western Michigan: 57 · next gametypical 62

Every game since 2016, one continuous line; thin rules separate seasons and the chip is where each season finished. Navy dot = win, red = loss. Big drops usually mean a new staff, a new quarterback or a rebuilt line.

Trend · Gelthis season, after each game
typical 62wk 1 · on-field 40 · fan mood 39391wk 2 vs Colgate · W · on-field 46 · fan mood 44462wk 3 vs Wyoming · W · on-field 63 · fan mood 57613wk 4 vs Miami · L · on-field 59 · fan mood 55584wk 5 vs Akron · W · on-field 64 · fan mood 66655wk 6 vs Ohio · L · on-field 63 · fan mood 61636

How the team is working right now, rebuilt after each game from only the games so far: on-field fit (results vs preseason expectation, lineup settling, execution) and that week's fan & media mood. Coach security is part of today's Gel number but isn't rebuilt week by week yet. Navy frame = win, red = loss.

Continuity facts
Head coach
Year 2
at this school
Offensive coordinator
Year 2
at this school
Defensive coordinator
Year 2
at this school
HC & OC together
2 seasons
working together
QB with his OC
1 seasons
same play-caller
QB & receivers
4.0 games
started together, average
Offensive line pairs
7.7 games
started together, average
Returning starters
41%
from last season
Starter experience
9 starts
career average
Internal facts
Pressers read
soon
this season, coaches and players
Coach tone
soon
vs his own normal
"We" vs "I"
soon
share of team language
Owning mistakes
soon
vs pointing outward
Same story
soon
coaches and players agree
After losses
soon
how fast tone recovers
Leaders named
soon
players teammates point to
Newcomers
soon
transfers talked about as part of it
Openness
soon
forthcoming vs guarded
Measured from press conferences and interviews, program by program.
Climate facts
Athletic director
Amy Folan
year 6
Football spending
$11.6M
2024-25 federal report
Spending trend
+10%
over three years
Department revenue
$39M
all sports
Recruiting spend
$0.40M
men's teams
Home crowds
—
of capacity
Staff turnover
23%
on-field staff new this season
Fan mood
soon
fans and local media
Coach & AD
soon
on the same page
Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Offense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Flores
Blue
Clerveaux
Lewis
Naves
Peters
Koivisto
Iannuzzi
Maka
Booth
Russell
QBAngel Flores62663366666
RBVaughn Blue22222122222
RBJayden Clerveaux62663366666
WRLangston Lewis62619331976719
WRBraylen Naves32333233333
TEMyles Peters31332333333
OLMartin Koivisto62619332276719
OLJohn Iannuzzi62673377667
OLLosini Maka62663366666
OLJacob Booth62673376677
OLJacob Russell62619331976719

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Defense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Fleet
Douglas
Demma
Cherry
McCalla
White
Taylor
Philord
Jackson
Bryant
Jones
DLMax Van Fleet66666665562
DLJJ Douglas66666665562
DLKorver Demma6619666651662
DLJaxon Cherry66666665562
LBBrett McCalla66666665562
LBXavier White66666665562
DBJustin Taylor66666665562
DBDonavan Philord55555555452
DBJaion Jackson5516555542451
DBDarrell Bryant Jr.66666665562
DBJajuan Jones22222222122

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Chemistry is Scorebook's own rating of how well a program fits together, on the same all-time 0-99 scale as our other ratings (compared with every FBS team since 2016; 62 is typical, 20-50 signals something is wrong, and single digits are reserved for true collapses; each season is compared with its own era). This early version blends continuity (who has played and coached together, and for how long; it counts most) with the climate around the program; how the program talks joins as it is measured. Within continuity, quarterback-centered pairings count most because they held up when we tested them against results. How our ratings work →