Scorebook
Join
Teams / ACC / Boston College
Index · this season
60
at its 5-year level
Career65since 1936
Peak841984
Last 562seasons
#81 nationally · 2-3 (0-2 conf)
Résumé #88
Schedule so far #76
Margin ±5 pts (tightens with games)
Why 60? →

Boston College Eagles

ACC · Chestnut Hill, MA · Alumni Stadium (Chestnut Hill, MA) · Head coach Bill O'Brien
Rival
Established rivalry
25-34 all time (59 meetings since 1924)
Syracuse leads
Last: won 34-12 (2025) · Boston College has won 3 straight
Holds it
program traits are earned from history
No recognized national titles since 1936. Counted: AP poll champion, a coaches-poll champion, or the BCS / playoff title-game winner; a split year counts for both. The school claims 1.0national titles
Heisman Trophy winners1Heisman
Seasons finishing in the AP top 10 since 19364AP top-10
Consensus All-Americans since 193610All-Americans
NFL draft picks since 1967115NFL picks
Winning percentage since 193655.7%win pct
History since 1936 · football since 1893. Every season →
Chemistry
Chem 50: typical50
Chem 51: typical
51Foundation
Chem 49: warning zone
49Gel
gel counts 40% so far
▼ Below its norm -4
early · #104 of 138
HC year3
Ret. starters32%
QB yrs w/ OC1
View chemistry →
Team chemistryearly · #104 of 138 FBS teams
Chem 51: typicalFoundation51+Chem 49: warning zoneGel49=Chem 50: typicalChem50Gel counts 40% so far (it grows as games are played, up to half)
Foundationwhat the program has built · moves over seasons
Foundation51Staff stability — Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnoverStaff stability51Roster continuity — Returning starters and the lineup's experienceRoster continuity51Unit cohesion — QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played togetherUnit cohesion44Administration — Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignmentAdministration65Investment — Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruitingInvestment66Fan base — How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matterFan base64
ContinuityClimate
Continuity · who has played and coached togetherlive

Who has played and coached together, and for how long, ranked against every FBS team at the same point of the season.

▸Staff stability
Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnover
51
Staff cohesion51
HC year 3 · OC year 1 · DC year 1
▸Roster continuity
Returning starters and the lineup's experience
51
Returning core60
32% of last season's starters · FBS median 32%
Experience42
9 career starts per starter · FBS median 12
▸Unit cohesion
QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played together
44
QB & coordinator55
1st season together · same as 76% of FBS teams
QB & receivers51
3.2 games started together on average · FBS median 3.9
Line cohesion43
3.5 games per linemen pair · FBS median 5.2
Defensive cohesion16
2.7 games per defensive pair · FBS median 4.5
Climate · around the programlive

The administration, money and fans around the team: athletic director continuity, willingness to invest, and crowds.

▸Administration
Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignment
65
AD continuity65
Blake James · year 5 (Wikipedia, CC BY-SA)
▸Investment
Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruiting
66
Football's share60
29% of department spending goes to football
Investment trend70
+45% over three years
Football investment69
$41.2M on football (2024-25 federal report)
Recruiting spend69
$2.02M men's recruiting
Department resources67
$142M athletic department revenue
▸Fan base
How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matter
64
Sellouts64
sellout crowds (95%+ of capacity) at 9 of 45 home games (last 8 seasons)
Sells out anyway65
sellout crowds at 6 of 30 games that didn't matter: cupcakes, or a team expected to lose or having a losing season

Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures, as reported by each school. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA). Attendance: reported crowds vs stadium capacity.

Gelhow it is working right now · moves week to week
Gel49Playing above its parts — Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by gamePlaying above its parts70Settled & sharp — A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normalSettled & sharp42Alignment — Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one pageAlignmentsoonResilience — Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversityResiliencesoonFan & media mood — Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins laterFan & media mood53Coach security — The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new ADCoach security44
InternalOn-field fitExternal
Internal · how the program talkscoming

How the team talks in press conferences and interviews, each program against its own normal, so a naturally terse coach isn't read as upset. Being built program by program, Big Ten first.

▸Alignment
Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one page
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.
▸Resilience
Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversity
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.

Readings are team-level; we don't publish psychological readings of individual players.

On-field fit · how it is playing togetherlive

How the team is playing together this season: beating or missing its preseason expectation, a settled lineup, clean execution.

▸Playing above its parts
Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by game
70
This season70
+2.5 points a game vs its preseason projection (4 games)
▸Settled & sharp
A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normal
42
This season42
78% of starters kept game to game
External · pressure from outsidelive

Pressure from outside the building: the hard-facts hot seat now; this season's fan and media mood as it is measured.

▸Fan & media mood
Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins later
53
This season53
outside the AP poll: projected #84 preseason -> #81 in our Index now · lost to rival Virginia Tech 21-14 (-6) · results 2-3 (-3, recent games count more)
▸Coach security
The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new AD
44
This season44
Bill O'Brien, year 3 · 40% wins so far · +2.5 pts a game vs preseason expectation · last two seasons -12% vs the program's norm

Dashed gold ring = typical (62). 20-50 is the warning zone; under 10 is a collapse. Spokes with no data yet are dashed and left out until they fill in. Chem blends the two halves, then places the blend among this season's teams.

Trend · Foundationeach program year runs Feb 1 to the title game
'1664'1759'1870'1949'2029'2162'2254'2355'2441'2560'262016 wk 1 vs Georgia Tech: 60 · L2016 wk 2 vs Massachusetts: 74 · W2016 wk 3 vs Virginia Tech: 59 · L2016 wk 4 vs Wagner: 64 · W2016 wk 5 vs Buffalo: 63 · W2016 wk 6 vs Clemson: 62 · L2016 wk 8 vs Syracuse: 69 · L2016 wk 9 vs NC State: 63 · W2016 wk 10 vs Louisville: 63 · L2016 wk 11 vs Florida State: 68 · L2016 wk 12 vs UConn: 65 · W2016 wk 13 vs Wake Forest: 71 · W2016 wk 1 vs Maryland: 64 · W2017 wk 2 vs Wake Forest: 64 · L2017 wk 3 vs Notre Dame: 64 · L2017 wk 4 vs Clemson: 64 · L2017 wk 5 vs Central Michigan: 64 · W2017 wk 6 vs Virginia Tech: 65 · L2017 wk 7 vs Louisville: 65 · W2017 wk 8 vs Virginia: 65 · W2017 wk 9 vs Florida State: 65 · W2017 wk 11 vs NC State: 64 · L2017 wk 12 vs UConn: 64 · W2017 wk 13 vs Syracuse: 60 · W2017 wk 1 vs Iowa: 59 · L2018 wk 2 vs Holy Cross: 69 · W2018 wk 3 vs Wake Forest: 68 · W2018 wk 4 vs Purdue: 69 · L2018 wk 5 vs Temple: 69 · W2018 wk 6 vs NC State: 70 · L2018 wk 7 vs Louisville: 69 · W2018 wk 9 vs Miami: 69 · W2018 wk 10 vs Virginia Tech: 69 · W2018 wk 11 vs Clemson: 70 · L2018 wk 12 vs Florida State: 69 · L2018 wk 13 vs Syracuse: 70 · L2019 wk 2 vs Richmond: 54 · W2019 wk 3 vs Kansas: 53 · L2019 wk 4 vs Rutgers: 56 · W2019 wk 5 vs Wake Forest: 56 · L2019 wk 6 vs Louisville: 58 · L2019 wk 8 vs NC State: 58 · W2019 wk 9 vs Clemson: 46 · L2019 wk 10 vs Syracuse: 49 · W2019 wk 11 vs Florida State: 51 · L2019 wk 13 vs Notre Dame: 53 · L2019 wk 14 vs Pittsburgh: 52 · W2019 wk 1 vs Cincinnati: 49 · L2020 wk 4 vs Texas State: 15 · W2020 wk 5 vs North Carolina: 15 · L2020 wk 6 vs Pittsburgh: 28 · W2020 wk 7 vs Virginia Tech: 29 · L2020 wk 8 vs Georgia Tech: 28 · W2020 wk 9 vs Clemson: 28 · L2020 wk 10 vs Syracuse: 29 · W2020 wk 11 vs Notre Dame: 29 · L2020 wk 13 vs Louisville: 18 · W2020 wk 14 vs Virginia: 29 · L2021 wk 2 vs Massachusetts: 62 · W2021 wk 3 vs Temple: 62 · W2021 wk 4 vs Missouri: 63 · W2021 wk 5 vs Clemson: 61 · L2021 wk 7 vs NC State: 63 · L2021 wk 8 vs Louisville: 62 · L2021 wk 9 vs Syracuse: 62 · L2021 wk 10 vs Virginia Tech: 62 · W2021 wk 11 vs Georgia Tech: 61 · W2021 wk 12 vs Florida State: 62 · L2021 wk 13 vs Wake Forest: 62 · L2022 wk 2 vs Virginia Tech: 56 · L2022 wk 3 vs Maine: 55 · W2022 wk 4 vs Florida State: 57 · L2022 wk 5 vs Louisville: 56 · W2022 wk 6 vs Clemson: 56 · L2022 wk 8 vs Wake Forest: 56 · L2022 wk 9 vs UConn: 56 · L2022 wk 10 vs Duke: 56 · L2022 wk 11 vs NC State: 49 · W2022 wk 12 vs Notre Dame: 50 · L2022 wk 13 vs Syracuse: 54 · L2023 wk 2 vs Holy Cross: 60 · W2023 wk 3 vs Florida State: 58 · L2023 wk 4 vs Louisville: 59 · L2023 wk 5 vs Virginia: 60 · W2023 wk 6 vs Army: 61 · W2023 wk 8 vs Georgia Tech: 59 · W2023 wk 9 vs UConn: 61 · W2023 wk 10 vs Syracuse: 60 · W2023 wk 11 vs Virginia Tech: 58 · L2023 wk 12 vs Pittsburgh: 57 · L2023 wk 13 vs Miami: 58 · L2023 wk 1 vs SMU: 55 · W2024 wk 2 vs Duquesne: 47 · W2024 wk 3 vs Missouri: 47 · L2024 wk 4 vs Michigan State: 47 · W2024 wk 5 vs Western Kentucky: 41 · W2024 wk 6 vs Virginia: 44 · L2024 wk 8 vs Virginia Tech: 47 · L2024 wk 9 vs Louisville: 45 · L2024 wk 11 vs Syracuse: 42 · W2024 wk 12 vs SMU: 45 · L2024 wk 13 vs North Carolina: 42 · W2024 wk 14 vs Pittsburgh: 38 · W2024 wk 1 vs Nebraska: 41 · L2025 wk 2 vs Michigan State: 61 · L2025 wk 3 vs Stanford: 62 · L2025 wk 5 vs California: 61 · L2025 wk 6 vs Pittsburgh: 58 · L2025 wk 7 vs Clemson: 60 · L2025 wk 8 vs UConn: 59 · L2025 wk 9 vs Louisville: 59 · L2025 wk 10 vs Notre Dame: 60 · L2025 wk 11 vs SMU: 58 · L2025 wk 12 vs Georgia Tech: 61 · L2025 wk 14 vs Syracuse: 60 · W2026 wk 2 vs Rutgers: 48 · W2026 wk 3 vs Maine: 47 · W2026 wk 4 vs Virginia Tech: 53 · L2026 wk 5 vs SMU: 49 · L2026 wk 7 vs Pittsburgh: 52 · next gametypical 62

Every game since 2016, one continuous line; thin rules separate seasons and the chip is where each season finished. Navy dot = win, red = loss. Big drops usually mean a new staff, a new quarterback or a rebuilt line.

Trend · Gelthis season, after each game
typical 62wk 1 · on-field 50 · fan mood 48491wk 2 vs Rutgers · W · on-field 56 · fan mood 53552wk 3 vs Maine · W · on-field 57 · fan mood 56573wk 4 vs Virginia Tech · L · on-field 54 · fan mood 48524wk 5 vs SMU · L · on-field 47 · fan mood 47475

How the team is working right now, rebuilt after each game from only the games so far: on-field fit (results vs preseason expectation, lineup settling, execution) and that week's fan & media mood. Coach security is part of today's Gel number but isn't rebuilt week by week yet. Navy frame = win, red = loss.

Continuity facts
Head coach
Year 3
at this school
Offensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
Defensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
HC & OC together
1 seasons
working together
QB with his OC
1 seasons
same play-caller
QB & receivers
3.3 games
started together, average
Offensive line pairs
3.5 games
started together, average
Returning starters
32%
from last season
Starter experience
9 starts
career average
Internal facts
Pressers read
soon
this season, coaches and players
Coach tone
soon
vs his own normal
"We" vs "I"
soon
share of team language
Owning mistakes
soon
vs pointing outward
Same story
soon
coaches and players agree
After losses
soon
how fast tone recovers
Leaders named
soon
players teammates point to
Newcomers
soon
transfers talked about as part of it
Openness
soon
forthcoming vs guarded
Measured from press conferences and interviews, program by program.
Climate facts
Athletic director
Blake James
year 5
Football spending
$41.2M
2024-25 federal report
Spending trend
+45%
over three years
Department revenue
$142M
all sports
Recruiting spend
$2.02M
men's teams
Home crowds
—
of capacity
Staff turnover
—
on-field staff new this season
Fan mood
soon
fans and local media
Coach & AD
soon
on the same page
Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Offense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
McKenzie
Dickens
Skeete
Pough
Moore
Kossmann
Phillips
Humphrey
Pruitt
Smith
Williams
QBMason McKenzie55345152554
RBEvan Dickens55345152554
WRJaedn Skeete331323132332
WRDawson Pough44294141483
TEZeke Moore55348152554
TECameron Kossmann11111111111
OLKristian Phillips55345152554
OLTrevon Humphrey22212122222
OLJudah Pruitt55345152554
OLRobert Smith IV553851525104
OLDJ Williams44234142444

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Defense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Jones
Nwosisi
McGee
Neil
Dixon
Palano
Price
Tucker
Comella
Upton
Green
DLKris Jones31211333131
DLOnye Nwosisi14312342331
DLCameron McGee23412442341
DLGavin Neil11111111111
LBKemori Dixon12215252223
LBAnthony Palano33412553351
DBKP Price3441553020454
DBMax Tucker3221232022132
DBCharlie Comella13312341431
DBMarcus Upton33412553351
DBTJ Green11113142114

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Chemistry is Scorebook's own rating of how well a program fits together, on the same all-time 0-99 scale as our other ratings (compared with every FBS team since 2016; 62 is typical, 20-50 signals something is wrong, and single digits are reserved for true collapses; each season is compared with its own era). This early version blends continuity (who has played and coached together, and for how long; it counts most) with the climate around the program; how the program talks joins as it is measured. Within continuity, quarterback-centered pairings count most because they held up when we tested them against results. How our ratings work →