Scorebook
Join
Teams / SEC / Arkansas
Index · this season
65
▼ Below its 5-year level -6▼ Down 7 this season
Career73since 1936
Peak901975
Last 571seasons
#66 nationally · 2-4 (0-3 conf)
Résumé #72
Schedule so far #8
Margin ±5 pts (tightens with games)
Why 65? →

Arkansas Razorbacks

SEC · Fayetteville, AR · Razorback Stadium · Head coach Ryan Silverfield
Rival
Ole Miss · also LSU
Heated rivalry
37-32-1 all time (70 meetings since 1908)
Arkansas leads
Last: lost 41-35 (2025) · Ole Miss has won 3 straight
Wants it back
program traits are earned from history
No recognized national titles since 1936. Counted: AP poll champion, a coaches-poll champion, or the BCS / playoff title-game winner; a split year counts for both. The school claims 1.0national titles
Heisman Trophy winners0Heisman
Seasons finishing in the AP top 10 since 193614AP top-10
Consensus All-Americans since 193617All-Americans
NFL draft picks since 1967138NFL picks
Winning percentage since 193656.0%win pct
History since 1936 · football since 1903. Every season →
Chemistry
Chem 52: new staff, still building52
Chem 44: warning zone
44Foundation
Chem 62: typical
62Gel
gel counts 45% so far
at its usual levelTrending up
early · #95 of 138
HC year1
Ret. starters32%
QB yrs w/ OC1
View chemistry →
Team chemistryearly · #95 of 138 FBS teams
Chem 44: warning zoneFoundation44+Chem 62: typicalGel62=Chem 52: typicalChem52Gel counts 45% so far (it grows as games are played, up to half)
Foundationwhat the program has built · moves over seasons
Foundation44Staff stability — Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnoverStaff stability36Roster continuity — Returning starters and the lineup's experienceRoster continuity60Unit cohesion — QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played togetherUnit cohesion56Administration — Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignmentAdministration74Investment — Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruitingInvestment65Fan base — How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matterFan base52
ContinuityClimate
Continuity · who has played and coached togetherlive

Who has played and coached together, and for how long, ranked against every FBS team at the same point of the season.

▸Staff stability
Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnover
36
Staff cohesion38
HC year 1 · OC year 1 · DC year 1
Assistant turnover34
86% of on-field staff new this season (FBS average about 45%)
▸Roster continuity
Returning starters and the lineup's experience
60
Returning core60
32% of last season's starters · FBS median 32%
Experience60
11 career starts per starter · FBS median 12
▸Unit cohesion
QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played together
56
QB & coordinator55
1st season together · same as 76% of FBS teams
QB & receivers70
4.5 games started together on average · FBS median 3.9
Line cohesion58
4.7 games per linemen pair · FBS median 5.2
Defensive cohesion33
3.3 games per defensive pair · FBS median 4.5
Climate · around the programlive

The administration, money and fans around the team: athletic director continuity, willingness to invest, and crowds.

▸Administration
Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignment
74
AD continuity74
Hunter Yurachek · year 9 (Wikipedia, CC BY-SA)
▸Investment
Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruiting
65
Football's share63
30% of department spending goes to football
Investment trend59
+25% over three years
Football investment78
$57.4M on football (2024-25 federal report)
Recruiting spend74
$2.54M men's recruiting
Department resources81
$196M athletic department revenue
▸Fan base
How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matter
52
Sellouts51
sellout crowds (95%+ of capacity) at 2 of 47 home games (last 8 seasons)
Sells out anyway54
sellout crowds at 2 of 38 games that didn't matter: cupcakes, or a team expected to lose or having a losing season

Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures, as reported by each school. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA). Attendance: reported crowds vs stadium capacity.

Gelhow it is working right now · moves week to week
Gel62Playing above its parts — Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by gamePlaying above its parts54Settled & sharp — A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normalSettled & sharp82Alignment — Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one pageAlignmentsoonResilience — Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversityResiliencesoonFan & media mood — Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins laterFan & media mood40Coach security — The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new ADCoach security60
InternalOn-field fitExternal
Internal · how the program talkscoming

How the team talks in press conferences and interviews, each program against its own normal, so a naturally terse coach isn't read as upset. Being built program by program, Big Ten first.

▸Alignment
Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one page
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.
▸Resilience
Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversity
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.

Readings are team-level; we don't publish psychological readings of individual players.

On-field fit · how it is playing togetherlive

How the team is playing together this season: beating or missing its preseason expectation, a settled lineup, clean execution.

▸Playing above its parts
Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by game
54
This season54
-2.7 points a game vs its preseason projection (5 games)
▸Settled & sharp
A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normal
82
This season82
90% of starters kept game to game
External · pressure from outsidelive

Pressure from outside the building: the hard-facts hot seat now; this season's fan and media mood as it is measured.

▸Fan & media mood
Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins later
40
This season40
outside the AP poll: projected #53 preseason -> #66 in our Index now · impatient fan base (reacts more to a miss) · results 2-4 (-5, recent games count more)
▸Coach security
The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new AD
60
This season60
Ryan Silverfield, year 1 · 33% wins so far · -2.7 pts a game vs preseason expectation · impatient fan base

Dashed gold ring = typical (62). 20-50 is the warning zone; under 10 is a collapse. Spokes with no data yet are dashed and left out until they fill in. Chem blends the two halves, then places the blend among this season's teams.

Trend · Foundationeach program year runs Feb 1 to the title game
'1665'1766'1848'1951'2014'2154'2257'2351'2458'2563'262016 wk 1 vs Louisiana Tech: 74 · W2016 wk 2 vs TCU: 84 · W2016 wk 3 vs Texas State: 74 · W2016 wk 4 vs Texas A&M: 76 · L2016 wk 5 vs Alcorn State: 77 · W2016 wk 6 vs Alabama: 70 · L2016 wk 7 vs Ole Miss: 70 · W2016 wk 8 vs Auburn: 71 · L2016 wk 10 vs Florida: 74 · W2016 wk 11 vs LSU: 68 · L2016 wk 12 vs Mississippi State: 67 · W2016 wk 13 vs Missouri: 66 · L2016 wk 1 vs Virginia Tech: 65 · L2017 wk 4 vs Texas A&M: 66 · L2017 wk 5 vs New Mexico State: 69 · W2017 wk 6 vs South Carolina: 68 · L2017 wk 7 vs Alabama: 66 · L2017 wk 8 vs Auburn: 61 · L2017 wk 9 vs Ole Miss: 61 · W2017 wk 10 vs Coastal Carolina: 60 · W2017 wk 11 vs LSU: 61 · L2017 wk 12 vs Mississippi State: 61 · L2017 wk 13 vs Missouri: 66 · L2018 wk 3 vs North Texas: 37 · L2018 wk 4 vs Auburn: 49 · L2018 wk 5 vs Texas A&M: 41 · L2018 wk 6 vs Alabama: 48 · L2018 wk 7 vs Ole Miss: 50 · L2018 wk 8 vs Tulsa: 50 · W2018 wk 9 vs Vanderbilt: 40 · L2018 wk 11 vs LSU: 48 · L2018 wk 12 vs Mississippi State: 48 · L2018 wk 13 vs Missouri: 48 · L2019 wk 3 vs Colorado State: 56 · W2019 wk 4 vs San José State: 52 · L2019 wk 5 vs Texas A&M: 50 · L2019 wk 7 vs Kentucky: 53 · L2019 wk 8 vs Auburn: 52 · L2019 wk 9 vs Alabama: 56 · L2019 wk 10 vs Mississippi State: 52 · L2019 wk 11 vs Western Kentucky: 56 · L2019 wk 13 vs LSU: 52 · L2019 wk 14 vs Missouri: 51 · L2020 wk 5 vs Mississippi State: 22 · W2020 wk 6 vs Auburn: 23 · L2020 wk 7 vs Ole Miss: 20 · W2020 wk 9 vs Texas A&M: 22 · L2020 wk 10 vs Tennessee: 23 · W2020 wk 11 vs Florida: 28 · L2020 wk 12 vs LSU: 27 · L2020 wk 14 vs Missouri: 27 · L2020 wk 15 vs Alabama: 14 · L2021 wk 2 vs Texas: 58 · W2021 wk 3 vs Georgia Southern: 58 · W2021 wk 4 vs Texas A&M: 57 · W2021 wk 5 vs Georgia: 55 · L2021 wk 6 vs Ole Miss: 57 · L2021 wk 7 vs Auburn: 58 · L2021 wk 8 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 57 · W2021 wk 10 vs Mississippi State: 55 · W2021 wk 11 vs LSU: 54 · W2021 wk 12 vs Alabama: 54 · L2021 wk 13 vs Missouri: 57 · W2021 wk 1 vs Penn State: 54 · W2022 wk 2 vs South Carolina: 61 · W2022 wk 3 vs Missouri State: 60 · W2022 wk 4 vs Texas A&M: 60 · L2022 wk 5 vs Alabama: 59 · L2022 wk 6 vs Mississippi State: 59 · L2022 wk 7 vs BYU: 55 · W2022 wk 9 vs Auburn: 54 · W2022 wk 10 vs Liberty: 59 · L2022 wk 11 vs LSU: 61 · L2022 wk 12 vs Ole Miss: 54 · W2022 wk 13 vs Missouri: 61 · L2022 wk 1 vs Kansas: 57 · W2023 wk 3 vs BYU: 47 · L2023 wk 4 vs LSU: 39 · L2023 wk 5 vs Texas A&M: 43 · L2023 wk 6 vs Ole Miss: 43 · L2023 wk 7 vs Alabama: 51 · L2023 wk 8 vs Mississippi State: 51 · L2023 wk 10 vs Florida: 52 · W2023 wk 11 vs Auburn: 52 · L2023 wk 12 vs Florida International: 44 · W2023 wk 13 vs Missouri: 51 · L2024 wk 3 vs UAB: 55 · W2024 wk 4 vs Auburn: 58 · W2024 wk 5 vs Texas A&M: 59 · L2024 wk 6 vs Tennessee: 60 · W2024 wk 8 vs LSU: 61 · L2024 wk 9 vs Mississippi State: 62 · W2024 wk 10 vs Ole Miss: 61 · L2024 wk 12 vs Texas: 60 · L2024 wk 13 vs Louisiana Tech: 61 · W2024 wk 14 vs Missouri: 61 · L2024 wk 1 vs Texas Tech: 58 · W2025 wk 3 vs Ole Miss: 59 · L2025 wk 4 vs Memphis: 61 · L2025 wk 5 vs Notre Dame: 61 · L2025 wk 7 vs Tennessee: 60 · L2025 wk 8 vs Texas A&M: 59 · L2025 wk 9 vs Auburn: 60 · L2025 wk 10 vs Mississippi State: 60 · L2025 wk 12 vs LSU: 58 · L2025 wk 13 vs Texas: 61 · L2025 wk 14 vs Missouri: 63 · L2026 wk 3 vs Georgia: 31 · L2026 wk 4 vs Tulsa: 43 · W2026 wk 5 vs Texas A&M: 44 · L2026 wk 6 vs Tennessee: 44 · L2026 wk 7 vs Vanderbilt: 44 · next gametypical 62

Every game since 2016, one continuous line; thin rules separate seasons and the chip is where each season finished. Navy dot = win, red = loss. Big drops usually mean a new staff, a new quarterback or a rebuilt line.

Trend · Gelthis season, after each game
typical 62wk 2 · on-field 48 · fan mood 36432wk 3 vs Georgia · L · on-field 71 · fan mood 27553wk 4 vs Tulsa · W · on-field 81 · fan mood 53704wk 5 vs Texas A&M · L · on-field 77 · fan mood 44655wk 6 vs Tennessee · L · on-field 76 · fan mood 40636

How the team is working right now, rebuilt after each game from only the games so far: on-field fit (results vs preseason expectation, lineup settling, execution) and that week's fan & media mood. Coach security is part of today's Gel number but isn't rebuilt week by week yet. Navy frame = win, red = loss.

Continuity facts
Head coach
Year 1
new this season
Offensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
Defensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
HC & OC together
1 seasons
working together
QB with his OC
1 seasons
same play-caller
QB & receivers
4.5 games
started together, average
Offensive line pairs
4.7 games
started together, average
Returning starters
32%
from last season
Starter experience
11 starts
career average
Internal facts
Pressers read
soon
this season, coaches and players
Coach tone
soon
vs his own normal
"We" vs "I"
soon
share of team language
Owning mistakes
soon
vs pointing outward
Same story
soon
coaches and players agree
After losses
soon
how fast tone recovers
Leaders named
soon
players teammates point to
Newcomers
soon
transfers talked about as part of it
Openness
soon
forthcoming vs guarded
Measured from press conferences and interviews, program by program.
Climate facts
Athletic director
Hunter Yurachek
year 9
Football spending
$57.4M
2024-25 federal report
Spending trend
+25%
over three years
Department revenue
$196M
all sports
Recruiting spend
$2.54M
men's teams
Home crowds
—
of capacity
Staff turnover
86%
on-field staff new this season
Fan mood
soon
fans and local media
Coach & AD
soon
on the same page
Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Offense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Jackson
Settles
Marshall
Cisse
Brown
Platt
Kitler
Breland
Broussard
Branham
Hawkes
QBKJ Jackson62556265652
RBCam Settles22222122221
WRChris Marshall52555155552
WRIsmael Cisse52555155552
WRCJ Brown62551591356142
TEJaden Platt211191091291
OLCaden Kitler62551391456132
OLMalachi Breland52555155552
OLKavion Broussard62556265652
OLKobe Branham52551491355152
OLAdam Hawkes21222122222

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Defense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Oke
Osborne
Rhodes
Jones
Bell
Bogle
Smith
Lewis
Harrison
Johnson
House
DLDavid Oke55511355555
DLHunter Osborne55511355555
DLQuincy Rhodes Jr.551511355555
DLCarlon Jones11111111111
DLCaleb Bell11111111111
LBBen Bogle33311333333
LBJa'Quavion Smith55511355555
DBShelton Lewis55511355555
DBChristian Harrison55511355555
DBJoker Johnson55511355555
DBKhmori House55511355555

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Chemistry is Scorebook's own rating of how well a program fits together, on the same all-time 0-99 scale as our other ratings (compared with every FBS team since 2016; 62 is typical, 20-50 signals something is wrong, and single digits are reserved for true collapses; each season is compared with its own era). This early version blends continuity (who has played and coached together, and for how long; it counts most) with the climate around the program; how the program talks joins as it is measured. Within continuity, quarterback-centered pairings count most because they held up when we tested them against results. How our ratings work →