Scorebook
Join
Teams / Sun Belt / App State
Index · this season
53
▼ Below its 5-year level -9
Career60since 1936
Peak762019
Last 562seasons
#116 nationally · 3-2 (0-1 conf)
Résumé #88 · record ahead of its play
Schedule so far #135
Margin ±5 pts (tightens with games)
Why 53? →

App State Mountaineers

Sun Belt · Boone, NC · Kidd Brewer Stadium · Head coach Dowell Loggains
Rival
Building rivalry
14-9 all time (23 meetings since 2003)
App State leads
Last: lost 25-23 (2025) · Georgia Southern has won 2 straight
Wants it back
program traits are earned from history
No recognized national titles since 1936. Counted: AP poll champion, a coaches-poll champion, or the BCS / playoff title-game winner; a split year counts for both.0national titles
Heisman Trophy winners0Heisman
Seasons finishing in the AP top 10 since 19360AP top-10
Consensus All-Americans since 19360All-Americans
NFL draft picks since 19678NFL picks
Winning percentage since 193658.9%win pct
History since 1936 · football since 1972. Every season →
Chemistry
Chem 63: typical63
Chem 59: typical
59Foundation
Chem 68: typical
68Gel
gel counts 40% so far
at its usual levelTrending up
early · #44 of 138
HC year2
Ret. starters18%
QB yrs w/ OC1
View chemistry →
Team chemistryearly · #44 of 138 FBS teams
Chem 59: typicalFoundation59+Chem 68: typicalGel68=Chem 63: typicalChem63Gel counts 40% so far (it grows as games are played, up to half)
Foundationwhat the program has built · moves over seasons
Foundation59Staff stability — Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnoverStaff stability54Roster continuity — Returning starters and the lineup's experienceRoster continuity32Unit cohesion — QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played togetherUnit cohesion59Administration — Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignmentAdministration99Investment — Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruitingInvestment58Fan base — How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matterFan base74
ContinuityClimate
Continuity · who has played and coached togetherlive

Who has played and coached together, and for how long, ranked against every FBS team at the same point of the season.

▸Staff stability
Coach and coordinator tenure, staff who came along, assistant turnover
54
Staff cohesion39
HC year 2 · OC year 1 · DC year 2
Assistant turnover69
30% of on-field staff new this season (FBS average about 45%)
▸Roster continuity
Returning starters and the lineup's experience
32
Returning core37
18% of last season's starters · FBS median 32%
Experience28
7 career starts per starter · FBS median 12
▸Unit cohesion
QB & coordinator, QB & receivers, offensive line, defense: how long each unit has played together
59
QB & coordinator55
1st season together · same as 76% of FBS teams
QB & receivers67
4.2 games started together on average · FBS median 3.9
Line cohesion55
4.5 games per linemen pair · FBS median 5.2
Defensive cohesion55
4.2 games per defensive pair · FBS median 4.5
Climate · around the programlive

The administration, money and fans around the team: athletic director continuity, willingness to invest, and crowds.

▸Administration
Athletic director continuity and coach-AD alignment
99
AD continuity99
Doug Gillin · year 11 (Wikipedia, CC BY-SA)
▸Investment
Commitment to football: its share of the department's spending and whether that is growing, plus spending and recruiting
58
Football's share61
30% of department spending goes to football
Investment trend61
+28% over three years
Football investment47
$13.3M on football (2024-25 federal report)
Recruiting spend53
$0.79M men's recruiting
Department resources47
$45M athletic department revenue
▸Fan base
How passionate and loyal the fan base is: how often it sells out, and whether it sells out games that don't matter
74
Sellouts74
sellout crowds (95%+ of capacity) at 25 of 41 home games (last 8 seasons)
Sells out anyway74
sellout crowds at 19 of 32 games that didn't matter: cupcakes, or a team expected to lose or having a losing season

Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures, as reported by each school. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA). Attendance: reported crowds vs stadium capacity.

Gelhow it is working right now · moves week to week
Gel68Playing above its parts — Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by gamePlaying above its parts76Settled & sharp — A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normalSettled & sharp71Alignment — Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one pageAlignmentsoonResilience — Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversityResiliencesoonFan & media mood — Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins laterFan & media mood61Coach security — The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new ADCoach security69
InternalOn-field fitExternal
Internal · how the program talkscoming

How the team talks in press conferences and interviews, each program against its own normal, so a naturally terse coach isn't read as upset. Being built program by program, Big Ten first.

▸Alignment
Coaches and players telling the same story; the staff on one page
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.
▸Resilience
Confidence, and how the team sounds after adversity
soon
Coming: measured from press conferences and interviews.

Readings are team-level; we don't publish psychological readings of individual players.

On-field fit · how it is playing togetherlive

How the team is playing together this season: beating or missing its preseason expectation, a settled lineup, clean execution.

▸Playing above its parts
Results vs what its preseason projection expected, game by game
76
This season76
+5.3 points a game vs its preseason projection (4 games)
▸Settled & sharp
A settled starting lineup and clean execution (penalties, turnovers) vs its own normal
71
This season71
86% of starters kept game to game
External · pressure from outsidelive

Pressure from outside the building: the hard-facts hot seat now; this season's fan and media mood as it is measured.

▸Fan & media mood
Expectations met or missed this season (preseason rank vs now), stronger for fan bases that react hard; fan and media sentiment joins later
61
This season61
outside the AP poll: projected #119 preseason -> #116 in our Index now · results 3-2 (-1, recent games count more)
▸Coach security
The hard-facts hot seat, inverted: results vs expectation, recent seasons vs the program's norm, stakes, a new AD
69
This season69
Dowell Loggains, year 2 · 60% wins so far · +5.3 pts a game vs preseason expectation · last two seasons -35% vs the program's norm

Dashed gold ring = typical (62). 20-50 is the warning zone; under 10 is a collapse. Spokes with no data yet are dashed and left out until they fill in. Chem blends the two halves, then places the blend among this season's teams.

Trend · Foundationeach program year runs Feb 1 to the title game
'1670'1774'1858'1959'2064'2168'2260'2354'242016 wk 1 vs Tennessee: 64 · L2016 wk 2 vs Old Dominion: 77 · W2016 wk 3 vs Miami: 65 · L2016 wk 4 vs Akron: 75 · W2016 wk 5 vs Georgia State: 69 · W2016 wk 7 vs Louisiana: 74 · W2016 wk 8 vs Idaho: 71 · W2016 wk 9 vs Georgia Southern: 72 · W2016 wk 10 vs Texas State: 76 · W2016 wk 11 vs Troy: 76 · L2016 wk 12 vs UL Monroe: 76 · W2016 wk 13 vs New Mexico State: 71 · W2016 wk 1 vs Toledo: 70 · W2017 wk 2 vs Savannah State: 74 · W2017 wk 3 vs Texas State: 74 · W2017 wk 4 vs Wake Forest: 75 · L2017 wk 6 vs New Mexico State: 75 · W2017 wk 7 vs Idaho: 76 · W2017 wk 8 vs Coastal Carolina: 76 · W2017 wk 9 vs Massachusetts: 75 · L2017 wk 10 vs UL Monroe: 75 · L2017 wk 11 vs Georgia Southern: 75 · W2017 wk 13 vs Georgia State: 76 · W2017 wk 14 vs Louisiana: 74 · W2017 wk 1 vs Toledo: 74 · W2018 wk 2 vs Charlotte: 59 · W2018 wk 4 vs Gardner-Webb: 60 · W2018 wk 5 vs South Alabama: 61 · W2018 wk 7 vs Arkansas State: 60 · W2018 wk 8 vs Louisiana: 62 · W2018 wk 9 vs Georgia Southern: 62 · L2018 wk 10 vs Coastal Carolina: 62 · W2018 wk 11 vs Texas State: 59 · W2018 wk 12 vs Georgia State: 60 · W2018 wk 13 vs Troy: 62 · W2018 wk 14 vs Louisiana: 62 · W2018 wk 1 vs Middle Tennessee: 58 · W2019 wk 2 vs Charlotte: 64 · W2019 wk 4 vs North Carolina: 62 · W2019 wk 5 vs Coastal Carolina: 64 · W2019 wk 7 vs Louisiana: 64 · W2019 wk 8 vs UL Monroe: 63 · W2019 wk 9 vs South Alabama: 65 · W2019 wk 10 vs Georgia Southern: 66 · L2019 wk 11 vs South Carolina: 67 · W2019 wk 12 vs Georgia State: 68 · W2019 wk 13 vs Texas State: 66 · W2019 wk 14 vs Troy: 68 · W2019 wk 15 vs Louisiana: 56 · W2019 wk 1 vs UAB: 59 · W2020 wk 3 vs Marshall: 67 · L2020 wk 4 vs Campbell: 67 · W2020 wk 8 vs Arkansas State: 67 · W2020 wk 9 vs UL Monroe: 66 · W2020 wk 10 vs Texas State: 68 · W2020 wk 11 vs Georgia State: 67 · W2020 wk 12 vs Coastal Carolina: 66 · L2020 wk 13 vs Troy: 68 · W2020 wk 14 vs Louisiana: 67 · L2020 wk 15 vs Georgia Southern: 67 · W2020 wk 1 vs North Texas: 64 · W2021 wk 2 vs Miami: 68 · L2021 wk 3 vs Elon: 71 · W2021 wk 4 vs Marshall: 68 · W2021 wk 5 vs Georgia State: 68 · W2021 wk 7 vs Louisiana: 70 · L2021 wk 8 vs Coastal Carolina: 69 · W2021 wk 9 vs UL Monroe: 70 · W2021 wk 10 vs Arkansas State: 69 · W2021 wk 11 vs South Alabama: 68 · W2021 wk 12 vs Troy: 68 · W2021 wk 13 vs Georgia Southern: 67 · W2021 wk 14 vs Louisiana: 67 · L2021 wk 1 vs Western Kentucky: 68 · L2022 wk 2 vs Texas A&M: 62 · W2022 wk 3 vs Troy: 59 · W2022 wk 4 vs James Madison: 62 · L2022 wk 5 vs The Citadel: 63 · W2022 wk 6 vs Texas State: 64 · L2022 wk 8 vs Georgia State: 63 · W2022 wk 9 vs Robert Morris: 62 · W2022 wk 10 vs Coastal Carolina: 60 · L2022 wk 11 vs Marshall: 64 · L2022 wk 12 vs Old Dominion: 63 · W2022 wk 13 vs Georgia Southern: 60 · L2023 wk 2 vs North Carolina: 53 · L2023 wk 3 vs East Carolina: 52 · W2023 wk 4 vs Wyoming: 52 · L2023 wk 5 vs UL Monroe: 57 · W2023 wk 7 vs Coastal Carolina: 59 · L2023 wk 8 vs Old Dominion: 59 · L2023 wk 9 vs Southern Miss: 58 · W2023 wk 10 vs Marshall: 59 · W2023 wk 11 vs Georgia State: 58 · W2023 wk 12 vs James Madison: 59 · W2023 wk 13 vs Georgia Southern: 59 · W2023 wk 14 vs Troy: 55 · L2023 wk 1 vs Miami (OH): 54 · W2024 wk 2 vs Clemson: 69 · L2024 wk 3 vs East Carolina: 71 · W2024 wk 4 vs South Alabama: 71 · L2024 wk 5 vs Liberty: 70 · next gametypical 62

Every game since 2016, one continuous line; thin rules separate seasons and the chip is where each season finished. Navy dot = win, red = loss. Big drops usually mean a new staff, a new quarterback or a rebuilt line.

Trend · Gelthis season, after each game
typical 62wk 2 vs East Carolina · W · on-field 74 · fan mood 99842wk 3 vs Charlotte · W · on-field 66 · fan mood 91763wk 4 vs NC State · L · on-field 74 · fan mood 87794wk 6 vs Old Dominion · L · on-field 72 · fan mood 71726

How the team is working right now, rebuilt after each game from only the games so far: on-field fit (results vs preseason expectation, lineup settling, execution) and that week's fan & media mood. Coach security is part of today's Gel number but isn't rebuilt week by week yet. Navy frame = win, red = loss.

Continuity facts
Head coach
Year 2
at this school
Offensive coordinator
Year 1
new this season
Defensive coordinator
Year 2
at this school
HC & OC together
1 seasons
working together
QB with his OC
1 seasons
same play-caller
QB & receivers
4.3 games
started together, average
Offensive line pairs
4.5 games
started together, average
Returning starters
18%
from last season
Starter experience
7 starts
career average
Internal facts
Pressers read
soon
this season, coaches and players
Coach tone
soon
vs his own normal
"We" vs "I"
soon
share of team language
Owning mistakes
soon
vs pointing outward
Same story
soon
coaches and players agree
After losses
soon
how fast tone recovers
Leaders named
soon
players teammates point to
Newcomers
soon
transfers talked about as part of it
Openness
soon
forthcoming vs guarded
Measured from press conferences and interviews, program by program.
Climate facts
Athletic director
Doug Gillin
year 11
Football spending
$13.3M
2024-25 federal report
Spending trend
+28%
over three years
Department revenue
$45M
all sports
Recruiting spend
$0.79M
men's teams
Home crowds
—
of capacity
Staff turnover
30%
on-field staff new this season
Fan mood
soon
fans and local media
Coach & AD
soon
on the same page
Finances: U.S. Department of Education athletics disclosures. Athletic directors: Wikipedia (CC BY-SA).
Offense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Singleton
Lewis
Lofton
Pickett
Fugitt
Howse
Manuel
Ramsey
Poindexter
Sweatt
Thomas
QBMalachi Singleton55555255534
RBJaquari Lewis56555255544
WRChris Lofton55555255534
WRSam Pickett III55555255534
TEDarrin Fugitt55555255534
TEJamel Howse22222222221
OLDevon Manuel55555255534
OLTrent Ramsey555552512694
OLTyriq Poindexter55555256634
OLCayden Sweatt343332393152
OLJayden Thomas44444144424

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Defense · games started togetherlatest lineup · 11 starters
Brown
Sandstrom
Clark
Benton
Phares
Mitchell
McBurrows
Henderson
Purdy
Conley
Henderson
DLJehchys Brown55555531555
DLCaleb Sandstrom58558531555
DLAaron Clark55555531555
DLAiden Benton5551212531555
LBColton Phares5851218561555
LBAlex Mitchell55555531555
DBJa'Den McBurrows33336361333
DBJa'Cari Henderson11111111111
DBKaleb Purdy55555531555
DBKhalil Conley55555531555
DBDevin Henderson55555531555

Each square: games the two players have started together at this school (darker = more). Gray diagonal: the player's own starts here.

Chemistry is Scorebook's own rating of how well a program fits together, on the same all-time 0-99 scale as our other ratings (compared with every FBS team since 2016; 62 is typical, 20-50 signals something is wrong, and single digits are reserved for true collapses; each season is compared with its own era). This early version blends continuity (who has played and coached together, and for how long; it counts most) with the climate around the program; how the program talks joins as it is measured. Within continuity, quarterback-centered pairings count most because they held up when we tested them against results. How our ratings work →