Scorebook
Join
Coaches / Head coach / Tre Lamb
Form · last two seasons
63
performing to its level
Rating62recent
Peak63best 5 yrs
Career61whole career
confidence

Tre Lamb

Head Coach · Tulsa

Headline rating: as head coach. Every role he has been rated in is below.

Chemistry
Chem 49: warning zone49
continuity at Tulsa · early
Seasons here2
Programs1
Stints1

Career path

Head-coaching stints since 1936; assistant roles since 2016
2025–2026TulsaHead Coach

Chemistry

vs every head coach since 2016 · 62 = typical
How much continuity and loyalty his programs carryat Tulsa
Tenure here — Seasons as head coach at his current schoolTenure here50Staff continuity — Seasons he and his offensive coordinator have worked togetherStaff continuity48Player retention — Players kept vs. the league norm for similar rosters (fewer transfers out)Player retention54Followers — Players and staff who followed him from his previous jobFollowers60QB & coordinator — How long his quarterbacks have played for the same coordinatorQB & coordinator45Roster continuity — Share of starters returning from one season to the next under himRoster continuity39
Tenure here
Seasons as head coach at his current school
50
Staff continuity
Seasons he and his offensive coordinator have worked together
48
Player retention
Players kept vs. the league norm for similar rosters (fewer transfers out)
54
Followers
Players and staff who followed him from his previous job
60
QB & coordinator
How long his quarterbacks have played for the same coordinator
45
Roster continuity
Share of starters returning from one season to the next under him
39
Dashed gold ring on the radar = average (62). Chemistry scale: 62 is typical, 20-50 is a warning sign, under 10 is a collapse.

As head coach

Rating62Form63≈ as usualPeak63Career61
2020–2026 · 7 seasonsRecord 31-33National titles 0Great seasons 0 (top ~7% of all teams that year)Career: too early to rank all-time (8+ seasons as a head coach)
  • Rating 62: his whole career, recent seasons weighted most, measured as how far his teams stood above their era, crediting him with half of what each program already was when he arrived (about the share that, historically, follows a coach to his next job), fading as the program becomes his own.
  • Peak 63: best five-season stretch, 2022–2026 at Gardner–Webb and East Tennessee State and Tulsa (25-24).
Over expectation · 2016 on55Results against what his rosters' talent predicted (program lift, evaluation, recruiting, staff building, game management).

Rating = who he is: his whole head-coaching career (since 1936), weighted toward recent years — how far his teams stood above their contemporaries, how much he lifted programs, his great seasons and titles. Form = the last two seasons. Career = the all-time ranking number.

Program lift58
Evaluation74
Results55
Recruiting68
Staff building57
Game management53
SeasonTeamRecordSeason rankvs contemporaries
2026Tulsa0-0#67+0.11 SD
2025Tulsa4-8#109-0.97 SD
Season rank = his team among all major-college teams that year; vs contemporaries = how far above the average team (in standard deviations).